Assessment of skeletal age is important in children’s
orthopaedics. We compared two simplified methods used in the assessment
of skeletal age. Both methods have been described previously with
one based on the appearance of the epiphysis at the olecranon and
the other on the digital epiphyses. We also investigated the influence
of assessor experience on applying these two methods. Our investigation was based on the anteroposterior left hand
and lateral elbow radiographs of 44 boys (mean: 14.4; 12.4 to 16.1
) and 78 girls (mean: 13.0; 11.1 to14.9) obtained during the pubertal
growth spurt. A total of nine observers examined the radiographs
with the observers assigned to three groups based on their experience (experienced,
intermediate and novice). These raters were required to determined
skeletal ages twice at six-week intervals. The correlation between
the two methods was determined per assessment and per observer groups. Interclass
correlation coefficients (ICC) evaluated the reproducibility of
the two methods. The overall correlation between the two methods was r = 0.83
for boys and r = 0.84 for girls. The correlation was equal between
first and second assessment, and between the observer groups (r ≥ 0.82).
There was an equally strong ICC for the assessment effect (ICC ≤ 0.4%)
and observer effect (ICC ≤ 3%) for each method. There was no significant
(p <
0.05) difference between the levels of experience. The two methods are equally reliable in assessing skeletal maturity.
The olecranon method offers detailed information during the pubertal
growth spurt, while the digital method is as accurate but less detailed,
making it more useful after the pubertal growth spurt once the olecranon
has ossified. Cite this article:
We describe the technique and results of medial
submuscular plating of the femur in paediatric patients and discuss its
indications and limitations. Specifically, the technique is used
as part of a plate-after-lengthening strategy, where the period
of external fixation is reduced and the plate introduced by avoiding
direct contact with the lateral entry wounds of the external fixator
pins. The technique emphasises that vastus medialis is interposed
between the plate and the vascular structures. A total of 16 patients (11 male and five female, mean age 9.6
years (5 to 17)), had medial submuscular plating of the femur. All
underwent distraction osteogenesis of the femur with a mean lengthening
of 4.99 cm (3.2 to 12) prior to plating. All patients achieved consolidation
of the regenerate without deformity. The mean follow-up was 10.5 months
(7 to 15) after plating for those with plates still Placing the plate on the medial side is advantageous when the
external fixator is present on the lateral side, and is biomechanically
optimal in the presence of a femoral defect. We conclude that medial
femoral submuscular plating is a useful technique for specific indications
and can be performed safely with a prior understanding of the regional
anatomy. Cite this article:
Percutaneous epiphysiodesis using transphyseal
screws (PETS) has been developed for the treatment of lower limb discrepancies
with the aim of replacing traditional open procedures. The goal
of this study was to evaluate its efficacy and safety at skeletal
maturity. A total of 45 consecutive patients with a mean skeletal
age of 12.7 years (8.5 to 15) were included and followed until maturity.
The mean efficacy of the femoral epiphysiodesis was 35% (14% to 87%)
at six months and 66% (21% to 100%) at maturity. The mean efficacy
of the tibial epiphysiodesis was 46% (18% to 73%) at six months
and 66% (25% to 100%) at maturity. In both groups of patients the
under-correction was significantly reduced between six months post-operatively
and skeletal maturity. The overall rate of revision was 18% (eight
patients), and seven of these revisions (87.5%) involved the tibia.
This series showed that use of the PETS technique in the femur was
safe, but that its use in the tibia was associated with a significant
rate of complications, including a valgus deformity in nine patients
(20%), leading us to abandon it in the tibia. The arrest of growth
was delayed and the final loss of growth at maturity was only 66%
of that predicted pre-operatively. This should be taken into account
in the pre-operative planning.
