To investigate the risk factors for progression of articular
cartilage damage after anatomical anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)
reconstruction. A total of 174 patients who underwent second-look arthroscopic
evaluation after anatomical ACL reconstruction were enrolled in
this study. The graded condition of the articular cartilage at the
time of ACL reconstruction was compared with that at second-look
arthroscopy. Age, gender, body mass index (BMI), ACL reconstruction
technique, meniscal conditions, and other variables were assessed
by regression analysis as risk factors for progression of damage
to the articular cartilage.Aims
Patients and Methods
Total knee replacement (TKR) smart tibial trials
have load-bearing sensors which will show quantitative compartment
pressure values and femoral-tibial tracking patterns. Without smart
trials, surgeons rely on feel and visual estimation of imbalance
to determine if the knee is optimally balanced. Corrective soft-tissue
releases are performed with minimal feedback as to what and how
much should be released. The smart tibial trials demonstrate graphically
where and how much imbalance is present, so that incremental releases
can be performed. The smart tibial trials now also incorporate accelerometers
which demonstrate the axial alignment. This now allows the surgeon
the option to perform a slight recut of the tibia or femur to provide
soft-tissue balance without performing soft-tissue releases. Using
a smart tibial trial to assist with soft-tissue releases or bone
re-cuts, improved patient outcomes have been demonstrated at one
year in a multicentre study of 135 patients (135 knees). Cite this article:
We used immediate post-operative in vivo three-dimensional
computed tomography to compare graft bending angles and femoral
tunnel lengths in 155 patients who had undergone single-bundle reconstruction
of the anterior cruciate ligament using the transtibial (n = 37),
anteromedial portal (n = 72) and
The lateral compartment is predominantly affected
in approximately 10% of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. The
anatomy, kinematics and loading during movement differ considerably
between medial and lateral compartments of the knee. This in the
main explains the relative protection of the lateral compartment
compared with the medial compartment in the development of osteoarthritis.
The aetiology of lateral compartment osteoarthritis can be idiopathic,
usually affecting the femur, or secondary to trauma commonly affecting
the tibia. Surgical management of lateral compartment osteoarthritis
can include osteotomy, unicompartmental knee replacement and total
knee replacement. This review discusses the biomechanics, pathogenesis
and development of lateral compartment osteoarthritis and its management. Cite this article:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the
long-term functional and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic removal
of unstable osteochondral lesions with subchondral drilling in the
lateral femoral condyle. We reviewed the outcome of 23 patients
(28 knees) with stage III or IV osteochondritis dissecans lesions
of the lateral femoral condyle at a mean follow-up of 14 years (10
to 19). The functional clinical outcomes were assessed using the Lysholm
score, which improved from a mean of 38.1 ( We found radiological evidence of degenerative changes in the
third or fourth decade of life at a mean of 14 years after arthroscopic
excision of the loose body and subchondral drilling for an unstable
osteochondral lesion of the lateral femoral condyle. Clinical and
functional results were more satisfactory.