The Vantage Total Ankle System is a fourth-generation low-profile fixed-bearing implant that has been available since 2016. We aimed to describe our early experience with this implant. This is a single-centre retrospective review of patients who underwent primary total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) with a Vantage implant between November 2017 and February 2020, with a minimum of two years’ follow-up. Four surgeons contributed patients. The primary outcome was reoperation and revision rate of the Vantage implant at two years. Secondary outcomes included radiological alignment, peri-implant complications, and pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcomes.Aims
Methods
Arthroplasty for end-stage hallux rigidus (HR) is controversial. Arthrodesis remains the gold standard for surgical treatment, although is not without its complications, with rates of up to 10% for nonunion, 14% for reoperation and 10% for metatarsalgia. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome of a double-stemmed silastic implant (Wright-Medical, Memphis, Tennessee, USA) for patients with end-stage HR. We conducted a retrospective review of 108 consecutive implants in 76 patients, between January 2005 and December 2016, with a minimum follow-up of two years. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was 61.6 years (42 to 84). There were 104 females and four males. Clinical, radiological, patient reported outcome measures (PROMS) data, a visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, and satisfaction scores were collected.Aims
Methods
The last decade has seen a considerable increase
in the use of in total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) to treat patients
with end-stage arthritis of the ankle. However, the longevity of
the implants is still far from that of total knee and hip arthroplasties. The aim of this review is to outline a diagnostic and treatment
algorithm for the painful TAA to be used when considering revision
surgery. Cite this article:
We compared the clinical and radiographic results
of total ankle replacement (TAR) performed in non-diabetic and diabetic
patients. We identified 173 patients who underwent unilateral TAR
between 2004 and 2011 with a minimum of two years’ follow-up. There
were 88 male (50.9%) and 85 female (49.1%) patients with a mean
age of 66 years ( The mean AOS and AOFAS scores were significantly better in the
non-diabetic group (p = 0.018 and p = 0.038, respectively). In all,
nine TARs (21%) in the diabetic group had clinical failure at a
mean follow-up of five years (24 to 109), which was significantly
higher than the rate of failure of 15 (11.6%) in the non-diabetic
group (p = 0.004). The uncontrolled diabetic subgroup had a significantly
poorer outcome than the non-diabetic group (p = 0.02), and a higher
rate of delayed wound healing. The incidence of early-onset osteolysis was higher in the diabetic
group than in the non-diabetic group (p = 0.02). These results suggest
that diabetes mellitus, especially with poor glycaemic control,
negatively affects the short- to mid-term outcome after TAR. Cite this article:
The Bologna–Oxford (BOX) total ankle replacement
(TAR) was developed with the aim of achieving satisfactory pain-free
movement of the ankle. To date, only one single multicentre study
has reported its clinical results. The aim of this study was to
conduct an independent review of its mid-term results. We retrospectively reviewed a total of 60 prospectively followed
patients in whom 62 BOX TARs had been implanted between 2004 and
2008. We used the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS)
score to assess the clinical results. Standardised radiographs taken
at the time of final follow-up were analysed by two observers. The
overall survival was 91.9% at a mean follow-up of 42.5 months (24
to 71). The mean AOFAS score had improved from 35.1 points (
