Scoliosis is a lateral curvature of the spine with associated rotation, often causing distress due to appearance. For some curves, there is good evidence to support the use of a spinal brace, worn for 20 to 24 hours a day to minimize the curve, making it as straight as possible during growth, preventing progression. Compliance can be poor due to appearance and comfort. A night-time brace, worn for eight to 12 hours, can achieve higher levels of curve correction while patients are supine, and could be preferable for patients, but evidence of efficacy is limited. This is the protocol for a randomized controlled trial of ‘full-time bracing’ versus ‘night-time bracing’ in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). UK paediatric spine clinics will recruit 780 participants aged ten to 15 years-old with AIS, Risser stage 0, 1, or 2, and curve size (Cobb angle) 20° to 40° with apex at or below T7. Patients are randomly allocated 1:1, to either full-time or night-time bracing. A qualitative sub-study will explore communication and experiences of families in terms of bracing and research. Patient and Public Involvement & Engagement informed study design and will assist with aspects of trial delivery and dissemination.Aims
Methods
To provide normative data that can assess spinal-related disability and the prevalence of back or leg pain among adults with no spinal conditions in the UK using validated questionnaires. A total of 1,000 participants with equal sex distribution were included and categorized in five age groups: 20 to 29, 30 to 39, 40 to 49, 50 to 59, and 60 to 69 years. Individuals with spinal pathologies were excluded. Participants completed the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22r), visual analogue scale (VAS) for back/leg pain, and the EuroQol five-dimension index (EQ-5D/VAS) questionnaires, and disclosed their age, sex, and occupation. They were also categorized in five professional groups: doctors, nurses, allied health professionals, office workers, and manual workers.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS), who had undergone spinal fusion after distraction-based spinal growth modulation using either traditional growing rods (TGRs) or magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs). We undertook a retrospective review of skeletally mature patients who had undergone fusion for an EOS, which had been previously treated using either TGRs or MCGRs. Measured outcomes included sequential coronal T1 to S1 height and major curve (Cobb) angle on plain radiographs and any complications requiring unplanned surgery before final fusion.Aims
Methods
The aim of this study was to determine if positive Waddell signs
were related to patients’ demographics or to perception of their
quality of life. This prospective cross-sectional study included 479 adult patients
with back pain from a university spine centre. Each completed SF-12
and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) questionnaires and underwent
standard spinal examinations to elicit Waddell signs. The relationship
between Waddell signs and age, gender, ODI, Mental Component Score
(MCS), and Physical Component Score (PCS) scores was determined.Aims
Patients and Methods
Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) allow non-invasive
correction of the spinal deformity in the treatment of early-onset
scoliosis. Conventional growing rod systems (CGRS) need repeated
surgical distractions: these are associated with the effect of the
‘law of diminishing returns’. The primary aim of this study was to quantify this effect in
MCGRs over sequential distractions. A total of 35 patients with a maximum follow-up of 57 months
were included in the study. There were 17 boys and 18 girls with
a mean age of 7.4 years (2 to 14). True Distraction (TD) was determined
by measuring the expansion gap on fluoroscopy. This was compared
with Intended Distraction (ID) and expressed as the ‘T/I’ ratio.
The T/I ratio and the Cobb angle were calculated at several time
points during follow-up.Aims
Patients and Methods
Dysphagia is a common complication of anterior
surgery of the cervical spine. The incidence of post-operative dysphagia
may be as high as 71% within the first two weeks after surgery,
but gradually decreases during the following months. However, 12%
to 14% of patients may have some persistent dysphagia one year after
the procedure. It has been shown that female gender, advanced age,
multilevel surgery, longer operating time and severe pre-operative
neck pain may be risk factors. Although the aetiology remains unclear
and is probably multifactorial, proposed causes include oesophageal
retraction, prominence of the cervical plate and prevertebral swelling.
Recently, pre-operative tracheal traction exercises and the use
of retropharyngeal steroids have been proposed as methods of reducing
post-operative dysphagia. We performed a systematic review to assess the incidence, aetiology,
risk factors, methods of assessment and management of dysphagia
following anterior cervical spinal surgery. Cite this article:
