After intercalary resection of a bone tumour from the femur,
reconstruction with a vascularized fibular graft (VFG) and massive
allograft is considered a reliable method of treatment. However,
little is known about the long-term outcome of this procedure. The
aims of this study were to determine whether the morbidity of this
procedure was comparable to that of other reconstructive techniques,
if it was possible to achieve a satisfactory functional result, and
whether biological reconstruction with a VFG and massive allograft
could achieve a durable, long-lasting reconstruction. A total of 23 patients with a mean age of 16 years (five to 40)
who had undergone resection of an intercalary bone tumour of the
femur and reconstruction with a VFG and allograft were reviewed
clinically and radiologically. The mean follow-up was 141 months
(24 to 313). The mean length of the fibular graft was 18 cm (12 to
29). Full weight-bearing without a brace was allowed after a mean
of 13 months (seven to 26).Aims
Patients and Methods
To date, all surgical techniques used for reconstruction
of the pelvic ring following supra-acetabular tumour resection produce
high complication rates. We evaluated the clinical, oncological
and functional outcomes of a cohort of 35 patients (15 men and 20
women), including 21 Ewing’s sarcomas, six chondrosarcomas, three sarcomas
not otherwise specified, one osteosarcoma, two osseous malignant
fibrous histiocytomas, one synovial cell sarcoma and one metastasis.
The mean age of the patients was 31 years (8 to 79) and the latest
follow-up was carried out at a mean of 46 months (1.9 to 139.5)
post-operatively. We undertook a functional reconstruction of the pelvic ring using
polyaxial screws and titanium rods. In 31 patients (89%) the construct
was encased in antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate. Preservation
of the extremities was possible for all patients. The survival rate
at three years was 93.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 77.9 to 98.4),
at five years it was 82.4% (95% CI 57.6 to 93.4). For the 21 patients
with Ewing’s sarcoma it was 95.2% (95% CI 70.7 to 99.3) and 81.5%
(95% CI 52.0 to 93.8), respectively. Wound healing problems were
observed in eight patients, deep infection in five and clinically
asymptomatic breakage of the screws in six. The five-year implant survival
was 93.3% (95% CI 57.8 to 95.7). Patients were mobilised at a mean
of 3.5 weeks (1 to 7) post-operatively. A post-operative neurological
defect occurred in 12 patients. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society
score at last available follow-up was 21.2 (10 to 27). This reconstruction technique is characterised by simple and
oncologically appropriate applicability, achieving high primary
stability that allows early mobilisation, good functional results
and relatively low complication rates. Cite this article:
Endoprosthetic reconstruction following resection of 31 tumours of the proximal femur in 30 patients was performed using a Wagner SL femoral revision stem. The mean follow-up was 25.6 months (0.6 to 130.0). Of the 28 patients with a metastasis, 27 died within a mean follow-up period of 18.1 months (0.6 to 56.3) after the operation, and the remaining patient was excluded from the study 44.4 months post-operatively when the stem was removed. The two patients with primary bone tumours were still alive at the latest follow-up of 81.0 and 130.0 months, respectively. One stem only was removed for suspected low-grade infection 44.4 months post-operatively. The worst-case survival rate with removal of the stem for any cause and/or loss to follow-up was 80.0% (95% confidence interval 44.9 to 100) at 130.0 months. The mean Karnofsky index increased from 44.2% (20% to 70%) pre-operatively to 59.7% (0% to 100%) post-operatively, and the mean Merle d’Aubigné score improved from 4.5 (0 to 15) to 12.0 (0 to 18). The mean post-operative Musculoskeletal Tumour Society score was 62.4% (3.3% to 100%). The Wagner SL femoral revision stem offers an alternative to special tumour prostheses for the treatment of primary and secondary tumours of the proximal femur. The mid-term results are very promising, but long-term experience is necessary.
We reviewed 25 patients who had undergone resection of a primary bone sarcoma which extended to within 5 cm of the knee with reconstruction by a combination of a free vascularised fibular graft and a massive allograft bone shell. The distal femur was affected in four patients and the proximal tibia in 21. Their mean age at the time of operation was 19.7 years (5 to 52) and the mean follow-up period 140 months (28 to 213). Three vascularised transfers failed. The mean time to union of the fibula was 5.6 months (3 to 10) and of the allograft 19.6 months (10 to 34). Full weight-bearing was allowed at a mean of 21.4 months (14 to 36). The mean functional score at final follow-up was 27.4 (18 to 30) using a modfied 30-point Musculoskeletal Tumour Society rating system. The overall limb-salvage rate was 88%. The results of our study suggest that the combined use of a vascularised fibular graft and allograft is of value as a limb-salvage procedure for intercalary reconstruction after resection of bone tumours around the knee, especially in skeletally immature patients.
