Accurate, reproducible outcome measures are essential
for the evaluation of any orthopaedic procedure, in both clinical
practice and research. Commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have
drawbacks such as ‘floor’ and ‘ceiling’ effects, limitations of
worldwide adaptability and an inability to distinguish pain from
function. They are also unable to measure the true outcome of an
intervention rather than a patient’s perception of that outcome. Performance-based functional outcome tools may address these
problems. It is important that both clinicians and researchers are
aware of these measures when dealing with high-demand patients,
using a new intervention or implant, or testing a new rehabilitation
protocol. This article provides an overview of some of the clinically-validated
performance-based functional outcome tools used in the assessment
of patients undergoing hip and knee surgery. Cite this article:
We report the five year outcomes of a two-stage
approach for infected total hip replacement. This is a single-surgeon
experience at a tertiary centre where the more straightforward cases
are treated using single-stage exchange. This study highlights the
vital role of the multidisciplinary team in managing these cases. A total of 125 patients (51 male, 74 female) with a mean age
of 68 years (42 to 78) were reviewed prospectively. Functional status
was assessed using the Harris hip score (HHS). The mean HHS improved
from 38 (6 to 78.5) pre-operatively to 81.2 (33 to 98) post-operatively.
Staphylococcus species were isolated in 85 patients (68%). The rate of control of infection was 96% at five years. In all,
19 patients died during the period of the study. This represented
a one year mortality of 0.8% and an overall mortality of 15.2% at
five years. No patients were lost to follow-up. We report excellent control of infection in a series of complex
patients and infections using a two-stage revision protocol supported
by a multidisciplinary approach. The reason for the high rate of
mortality in these patients is not known. Cite this article:
There has been an in increase in the availability
of effective biological agents for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
as well as a shift towards early diagnosis and management of the
inflammatory process. This article explores the impact this may
have on the place of orthopaedic surgery in the management of patients
with rheumatoid arthritis. Cite this article:
Intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown
to be effective in reducing blood loss and the need for transfusion
after joint replacement. Recently, there has been interest in applying
it topically before the closure of surgical wounds. This has the
advantages of ease of application, maximum concentration at the
site of bleeding, minimising its systemic absorption and, consequently,
concerns about possible side-effects. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis which included
14 randomised controlled trials (11 in knee replacement, two in
hip replacement and one in both) which investigated the effect of
topical TXA on blood loss and rates of transfusion. Topical TXA
significantly reduced the rate of blood transfusion (total knee
replacement: risk ratio (RR) 4.51; 95% confidence interval (CI):
3.02 to 6.72; p <
0.001 (nine trials, I2 = 0%); total
hip replacement: RR 2.56; 95% CI: 1.32 to 4.97, p = 0.004 (one trial)).
The rate of thromboembolic events with topical TXA were similar
to those found with a placebo. Indirect comparison of placebo-controlled
trials of topical and intravenous TXA indicates that topical administration
is superior to the intravenous route. In conclusion, topical TXA is an effective and safe method of
reducing the need for blood transfusion after total knee and hip
replacement. Further research is required to find its optimum dose
for topical use. Cite this article:
In this systematic review, our aim was to explore
whether or not patients are able to return to athletic activity
following lower limb joint replacement. We also investigated any evidence
as to whether participation in athletic activity post-joint replacement
increases complications and reduces implant survival. A PubMed, Embase and Sports Discus search was performed using
the MeSH terms ‘Sport’, ‘Athletic’, ‘Athlete’, ‘Physical’, ‘Activity’,
‘Arthroplasty’, ‘Total Hip Replacement’, ‘Hip Resurfacing’, ‘Total
Knee Replacement’, ‘Unicompartmental Knee Replacement’ and ‘Unicondylar
Knee Replacement’. From this search, duplications were excluded,
the remaining abstracts were reviewed and any unrelated to the search
terms were excluded. The remaining abstracts had their full papers
reviewed. Following joint replacement, participation in sporting activity
is common principally determined by pre-operative patient activity
levels, BMI and patient age. The type of joint replaced is of less
significance. Total time spent performing activity does not change
but tends to be at a lower intensity. There is little evidence in
the literature of an association between high activity levels and
early implant failure. Cite this article:
Substantial healthcare resources have been devoted
to computer navigation and patient-specific instrumentation systems
that improve the reproducibility with which neutral mechanical alignment
can be achieved following total knee replacement (TKR). This choice of
alignment is based on the long-held tenet that the alignment of
the limb post-operatively should be within 3° of a neutral mechanical
axis. Several recent studies have demonstrated no significant difference
in survivorship when comparing well aligned Review of the literature suggests that a neutral mechanical axis
remains the optimal guide to alignment. Cite this article:
Periprosthetic fractures are an increasingly
common complication following joint replacement. The principles
which underpin their evaluation and treatment are common across
the musculoskeletal system. The Unified Classification System proposes
a rational approach to treatment, regardless of the bone that is
broken or the joint involved. Cite this article:
