The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the outcomes
of coccygectomy for patients with chronic coccydynia. Between 2007 and 2011, 98 patients underwent coccygectomy for
chronic coccydynia. The patients were aged >
18 years, had coccygeal
pain, local tenderness and a radiological abnormality, and had failed
conservative management. Outcome measures were the Short Form 36
(SF-36), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and a visual analogue
scale (VAS) for pain. Secondary analysis compared the pre-operative
features and the outcomes of patients with successful and failed
treatment, two years post-operatively. The threshold for success
was based on a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) on
the ODI of 20 points. All other patients, including those lost to
follow-up, were classified as failures.Aims
Patients and Methods
The December 2015 Spine Roundup360 looks at: Ketamine in scoliosis surgery; Teriparatide in osteoporotic spinal fractures; Trabecular metal in the spine?; Revision surgery a SPORTing chance?; The course of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis; Hip or lumbar spine: a common conundrum
We describe 13 patients with cerebral palsy and
lordoscoliosis/hyperlordosis of the lumbar spine who underwent a posterior
spinal fusion at a mean age of 14.5 years (10.8 to 17.4) to improve
sitting posture and relieve pain. The mean follow-up was 3.3 years
(2.2 to 6.2). The mean pre-operative lumbar lordosis was 108° (80
to 150°) and was corrected to 62° (43° to
85°); the mean thoracic kyphosis from 17° (-23° to
35°) to 47° (25° to 65°);
the mean scoliosis from 82° (0° to 125°)
to 22° (0° to 40°); the mean pelvic
obliquity from 21° (0° to 38°)
to 3° (0° to 15°); the mean sacral
slope from 79° (54° to 90°) to
50° (31° to 66°). The mean pre-operative
coronal imbalance was 5 cm (0 cm to 8.9 cm) and was corrected to
0.6 cm (0 to 3.2). The mean sagittal imbalance of -8 cm (-16 cm
to 7.8 cm) was corrected to -1.6 cm
(-4 cm to 2.5 cm). The mean operating time was 250 minutes (180
to 360 minutes) and intra-operative blood loss 0.8 of estimated
blood volume (0.3 to 2 estimated blood volume). The mean intensive
care and hospital stay were 3.5 days (2 to 8) and 14.5 days (10
to 27), respectively. Three patients lost a significant amount of
blood intra-operatively and subsequently developed chest or urinary
infections and superior mesenteric artery syndrome. An increased pre-operative lumbar lordosis and sacral slope were
associated with increased peri-operative morbidity: scoliosis and
pelvic obliquity were not. A reduced lumbar lordosis and increased
thoracic kyphosis correlated with better global sagittal balance
at follow-up. All patients and their parents reported excellent
surgical outcomes. Lordoscoliosis and hyperlordosis are associated with significant
morbidity in quadriplegic patients. They are rare deformities and
their treatment is challenging. Sagittal imbalance is the major
component: it can be corrected by posterior fusion of the spine
with excellent functional results. Cite this article:
Whether to combine spinal decompression with
fusion in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis remains
controversial. We performed a cohort study to determine the effect
of the addition of fusion in terms of patient satisfaction after
decompressive spinal surgery in patients with and without a degenerative spondylolisthesis. The National Swedish Register for Spine Surgery (Swespine) was
used for the study. Data were obtained for all patients in the register
who underwent surgery for stenosis on one or two adjacent lumbar
levels. A total of 5390 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria
and completed a two-year follow-up. Using multivariable models the
results of 4259 patients who underwent decompression alone were
compared with those of 1131 who underwent decompression and fusion.
The consequence of having an associated spondylolisthesis in the
operated segments pre-operatively was also considered. At two years there was no significant difference in patient satisfaction
between the two treatment groups for any of the outcome measures,
regardless of the presence of a pre-operative spondylolisthesis.
Moreover, the proportion of patients who required subsequent further
lumbar surgery was also similar in the two groups. In this large cohort the addition of fusion to decompression
was not associated with an improved outcome. Cite this article:
There have been a few reports of patients with
a combination of lumbar and thoracic spinal stenosis. We describe six
patients who suffered unexpected acute neurological deterioration
at a mean of 7.8 days (6 to 10) after lumbar decompressive surgery.
Five had progressive weakness and one had recurrent pain in the
lower limbs. There was incomplete recovery following subsequent
thoracic decompressive surgery. The neurological presentation can be confusing. Patients with
compressive myelopathy due to lower thoracic lesions, especially
epiconus lesions (T10 to T12/L1 disc level), present with similar
symptoms to those with lumbar radiculopathy or cauda equina lesions.
Despite the rarity of this condition we advise that patients who
undergo lumbar decompressive surgery for stenosis should have sagittal
whole spine MRI studies pre-operatively to exclude proximal neurological
compression. Cite this article:
The April 2013 Spine Roundup360 looks at: smuggling spinal implants; local bone graft and PLIF; predicting disability with slipped discs; mortality and spinal surgery; spondyloarthropathy; brachytherapy; and fibrin mesh and BMP.
The June 2015 Spine Roundup360 looks at: Less is more in pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis; Paracetamol out of favour in spinal pain but effective for osteoarthritis; Local wound irrigation to reduce infection?; Lumbar facet joint effusion: a reliable prognostic sign?; SPORT for the octogenarian; Neurological deterioration following traumatic spinal cord injury; PROMS in spinal surgery
Studies which consider the molecular mechanisms of degeneration and regeneration of cartilaginous tissues are seriously hampered by problematic ribonucleic acid (RNA) isolations due to low cell density and the dense, proteoglycan-rich extracellular matrix of cartilage. Proteoglycans tend to co-purify with RNA, they can absorb the full spectrum of UV light and they are potent inhibitors of polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Therefore, the objective of the present study is to compare and optimise different homogenisation methods and RNA isolation kits for an array of cartilaginous tissues. Tissue samples such as the nucleus pulposus (NP), annulus fibrosus (AF), articular cartilage (AC) and meniscus, were collected from goats and homogenised by either the MagNA Lyser or Freezer Mill. RNA of duplicate samples was subsequently isolated by either TRIzol (benchmark), or the RNeasy Lipid Tissue, RNeasy Fibrous Tissue, or Aurum Total RNA Fatty and Fibrous Tissue kits. RNA yield, purity, and integrity were determined and gene expression levels of type II collagen and aggrecan were measured by real-time PCR.Objectives
Materials and Methods
The outcome of surgery for recurrent lumbar disc
herniation is debatable. Some studies show results that are comparable
with those of primary discectomy, whereas others report worse outcomes.
The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of revision
lumbar discectomy with that of primary discectomy in the same cohort
of patients who had both the primary and the recurrent herniation
at the same level and side. A retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered data was undertaken
in 30 patients who had undergone both primary and revision surgery
for late recurrent lumbar disc herniation. The outcome measures
used were visual analogue scales for lower limb (VAL) and back (VAB)
pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). There was a significant improvement in the mean VAL and ODI scores
(both p <
0.001) after primary discectomy. Revision surgery also
resulted in improvements in the mean VAL (p <
0.001), VAB (p
= 0.030) and ODI scores (p <
0.001). The changes were similar
in the two groups (all p >
0.05). Revision discectomy can give results that are as good as those
seen after primary surgery. Cite this article:
The Oxford Hip and Knee Scores (OHS, OKS) have been demonstrated
to vary according to age and gender, making it difficult to compare
results in cohorts with different demographics. The aim of this
paper was to calculate reference values for different patient groups
and highlight the concept of normative reference data to contextualise an
individual’s outcome. We accessed prospectively collected OHS and OKS data for patients
undergoing lower limb joint arthroplasty at a single orthopaedic
teaching hospital during a five-year period.
T-scores were calculated based on the OHS and OKS distributions. Objectives
Methods
The aims of our study were to provide long-term information on
the behaviour of the thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curve after thoracic
anterior correction and fusion (ASF) and to determine the impact
of ASF on pulmonary function. A total of 41 patients (four males, 37 females) with main thoracic
(MT) adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) treated with ASF were
included. Mean age at surgery was 15.2 years (11 to 27). Mean follow-up
period was 13.5 years (10 to 18).Aims
Patients and Methods
Pedicle-lengthening osteotomy is a novel surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), which achieves substantial enlargement of the spinal canal by expansion of the bilateral pedicle osteotomy sites. Few studies have evaluated the impact of this new surgery on spinal canal volume (SCV) and neural foramen dimension (NFD) in three different types of LSS patients. CT scans were performed on 36 LSS patients (12 central canal stenosis (CCS), 12 lateral recess stenosis (LRS), and 12 foraminal stenosis (FS)) at L4-L5, and on 12 normal (control) subjects. Mimics 14.01 workstation was used to reconstruct 3D models of the L4-L5 vertebrae and discs. SCV and NFD were measured after 1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm, 4 mm, or 5 mm pedicle-lengthening osteotomies at L4 and/or L5. One-way analysis of variance was used to examine between-group differences.Objectives
Methods
Drug therapy forms an integral part of the management
of many orthopaedic conditions. However, many medicines can produce
serious adverse reactions if prescribed inappropriately, either
alone or in combination with other drugs. Often these hazards are
not appreciated. In response to this, the European Union recently
issued legislation regarding safety measures which member states
must adopt to minimise the risk of errors of medication. In March 2014 the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory
Agency and NHS England released a Patient Safety Alert initiative
focussed on errors of medication. There have been similar initiatives
in the United States under the auspices of The National Coordinating
Council for Medication Error and The Joint Commission on the Accreditation
of Healthcare Organizations. These initiatives have highlighted
the importance of informing and educating clinicians. Here, we discuss common drug interactions and contra-indications
in orthopaedic practice. This is germane to safe and effective clinical
care. Cite this article:
