The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of a salvage procedure using a 95° angled blade plate for failed osteosynthesis of atypical subtrochanteric femoral fractures associated with the long-term use of bisphosphonates. These were compared with those for failed osteosynthesis of subtrochanteric fractures not associated with bisphosphonate treatment. Between October 2008 and July 2016, 14 patients with failed osteosynthesis of an atypical subtrochanteric femoral fracture were treated with a blade plate (atypical group). Their mean age was 67.8 years (60 to 74); all were female. During the same period, 21 patients with failed osteosynthesis of a typical subtrochanteric fracture underwent restabilization using a blade plate (typical group). Outcome variables included the time of union, postoperative complications, Harris Hip Score, and Sanders functional rating scale.Aims
Patients and Methods
The June 2015 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: Infection in megaprosthesis; Impressive results for mid femoral reconstruction; Revered teaching or old myth? Femoral neck protection in metastatic disease; Megaprosthesis about the knee; Malignant transformation in multiple hereditary exostoses; Fracture of intercalary bone allograft; Comorbidity and outcomes in sarcoma; A worrying turn? Use of denosumab for giant cell tumour of bone
Elective surgery has been severely curtailed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. There is little evidence to guide surgeons in assessing what processes should be put in place to restart elective surgery safely in a time of endemic COVID-19 in the community. We used data from a stand-alone hospital admitting and operating on 91 trauma patients. All patients were screened on admission and 100% of patients have been followed-up after discharge to assess outcome.Aims
Methods
We wished to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled
trial of parathyroid hormone (PTH) supplements to aid healing of
trochanteric fractures of the hip, by an open label prospective
feasibility and pilot study with a nested qualitative sub study.
This aimed to inform the design of a future powered study comparing
the functional recovery after trochanteric hip fracture in patients
undergoing standard care, We undertook a pilot study comparing the functional recovery
after trochanteric hip fracture in patients 60 years or older, admitted
with a trochanteric hip fracture, and potentially eligible to be
randomised to either standard care or the administration of subcutaneous
PTH for six weeks. Our desired outcomes were functional testing
and measures to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the
study.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aims of this study were to evaluate the incidence of postoperatively restricted weight-bearing and its association with outcome in patients who undergo surgery for a fracture of the hip. Patient aged > 60 years undergoing surgery for a hip fracture were identified in the 2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Hip Fracture Targeted Procedure Dataset. Analysis of the effect of restricted weight-bearing on adverse events, delirium, infection, transfusion, length of stay, return to the operating theatre, readmission and mortality within 30 days postoperatively were assessed. Multivariate regression analysis was used to adjust for confounding demographic, comorbid and procedural characteristics.Aims
Patients and Methods
Fractures of the distal femur can be challenging to manage and
are on the increase in the elderly osteoporotic population. Management
with casting or bracing can unacceptably limit a patient’s ability
to bear weight, but historically, operative fixation has been associated
with a high rate of re-operation. In this study, we describe the outcomes
of fixation using modern implants within a strategy of early return
to function. All patients treated at our centre with lateral distal femoral
locking plates (LDFLP) between 2009 and 2014 were identified. Fracture
classification and operative information including weight-bearing
status, rates of union, re-operation, failure of implants and mortality
rate, were recorded.Aims
Patients and Methods
Fractures of the proximal femur are a common clinical problem, and a number of orthopaedic devices are available for the treatment of such fractures. The objective of this study was to assess the rotational stability, a common failure predictor, of three different rotational control design philosophies: a screw, a helical blade and a deployable crucifix. Devices were compared in terms of the mechanical work (W) required to rotate the implant by 6° in a bone substitute material. The substitute material used was Sawbones polyurethane foam of three different densities (0.08 g/cm3, 0.16 g/cm3 and 0.24 g/cm3). Each torsion test comprised a steady ramp of 1°/minute up to an angular displacement of 10°.Objectives
Methods
We performed a retrospective review of all patients
admitted to two large University Hospitals in the United Kingdom
over a 24-month period from January 2008 to January 2010 to identify
the incidence of atypical subtrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures
and their relationship to bisphosphonate treatment. Of the 3515 patients
with a fracture of the proximal femur, 156 fractures were in the
subtrochanteric region. There were 251 femoral shaft fractures.
The atypical fracture pattern was seen in 27 patients (7%) with
29 femoral shaft or subtrochanteric fractures. A total of 22 patients
with 24 atypical fractures were receiving bisphosphonate treatment at
the time of fracture. Prodromal pain was present in nine patients
(11 fractures); 11 (50%) of the patients on bisphosphonates suffered
12 spontaneous fractures, and healing of these fractures was delayed
in a number of patients. This large dual-centre review has established
the incidence of atypical femoral fractures at 7% of the study population,
81% of whom had been on bisphosphonate treatment for a mean of 4.6
years (0.04 to 12.1). This study does not advocate any change in the use of bisphosphonates
to prevent fragility fractures but attempts to raise awareness of
this possible problem so symptomatic patients will be appropriately
investigated. However, more work is required to identify the true
extent of this new and possibly increasing problem.
The December 2014 Trauma Roundup360 looks at: infection and temporising external fixation; Vitamin C in distal radial fractures; DRAFFT: Cheap and cheerful Kirschner wires win out; femoral neck fractures not as stable as they might be; displaced sacral fractures give high morbidity and mortality; sanders and calcaneal fractures: a 20-year experience; bleeding and pelvic fractures; optimising timing for acetabular fractures; and tibial plateau fractures.
Most hip fractures treated with modern internal
fixation techniques will heal. However, failures occasionally occur and
require revision procedures. Salvage strategies employed during
revision are based on whether the fixation failure occurs in the
femoral neck, or in the intertrochanteric region. Patient age and
remaining bone stock also influence decision making. For fractures
in young patients, efforts are generally focused on preserving the
native femoral head via osteotomies and repeat internal fixation.
For failures in older patients, some kind of hip replacement is
usually selected. Disuse osteopenia, deformity, bone loss, and stress-risers
from previous internal fixation devices all pose technical challenges
to successful reconstruction. Attention to detail is important in
order to minimise complications. In the majority of cases, good
outcomes have been reported for the various salvage strategies. Cite this article:
Many tumors metastasise to bone, therefore, pathologic
fracture and impending pathologic fractures are common reasons for
orthopedic consultation. Having effective treatment strategies is
important to avoid complications, and relieve pain and preserve
function. Thorough pre-operative evaluation is recommended for medical
optimization and to ensure that the lesion is in fact a metastasis
and not a primary bone malignancy. For impending fractures, various scoring
systems have been proposed to determine the risk of fracture, and
therefore the need for prophylactic stabilisation. Lower score lesions
can often be treated with radiation, while more problematic lesions
may require internal fixation. Intramedullary fixation is generally
preferred due to favorable biomechanics. Arthroplasty may be required
for lesions with massive bony destruction where internal fixation
attempts are likely to fail. Radiation may also be useful postoperatively
to minimise construct failure due to tumor progression.
The August 2013 Trauma Roundup360 looks at: reverse oblique fractures do better with a cephalomedullary device; locking screws confer no advantage in tibial plateau fractures; it’s all about the radius of curvature; radius of curvature revisited; radial head replacement in complex elbow reconstruction; stem cells in early fracture haematoma; heterotrophic ossification in forearms; and Boston in perspective.
