The β-angle is a radiological tool for measuring the distance between the pathological head-neck junction and the acetabular rim with the hip in 90° of flexion in patients with
Open reduction of the prominence at the femoral head-neck junction in
There is a known association between
Conventional treatment of mild slipped capital femoral epiphysis consists of fixation in situ with wires or screws. Recent contributions to the literature suggest that even a mild slip may lead to early damage of the acetabular labrum and adjacent cartilage by abutment of a prominent femoral metaphysis. It has been suggested that the appropriate treatment in mild slipped capital femoral epiphysis should not only prevent further slipping of the epiphysis, but also address potential
Labral tears are commonly associated with
Objectives. The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on measurement of muscle strength in patients with
Aims. The purpose of this study was to evaluate spinopelvic mechanics from standing and sitting positions in subjects with and without
There have been considerable recent advances in the understanding and management of
Although the association between
Slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) is one
of the known causes of cam-type
We retrospectively examined the long-term outcome of 96 asymptomatic hips in 96 patients with a mean age of 49.3 years (16 to 65) who had radiological evidence of
We reviewed the clinical outcome of arthroscopic femoral osteochondroplasty for cam
Over an eight-month period we prospectively enrolled 122 patients who underwent arthroscopic surgery of the hip for
The radiological evaluation of the anterolateral femoral head is an essential tool for the assessment of the cam type of
Deformity after slipped upper femoral epiphysis
(SUFE) can cause cam-type
Aims.
There is an increased risk of fracture following
osteoplasty of the femoral neck for cam-type femoroacetabular impingement
(FAI). Resection of up to 30% of the anterolateral head–neck junction
has previously been considered to be safe, however, iatrogenic fractures
have been reported with resections within these limits. We re-evaluated
the amount of safe resection at the anterolateral femoral head–neck
junction using a biomechanically consistent model. In total, 28 composite bones were studied in four groups: control,
10% resection, 20% resection and 30% resection. An axial load was
applied to the adducted and flexed femur. Peak load, deflection
at time of fracture and energy to fracture were assessed using comparison
groups. There was a marked difference in the mean peak load to fracture
between the control group and the 10% resection group (p <
0.001).
The control group also tolerated significantly more deflection before
failure (p <
0.04). The mean peak load (p = 0.172), deflection
(p = 0.547), and energy to fracture (p = 0.306) did not differ significantly between
the 10%, 20%, and 30% resection groups. Any resection of the anterolateral quadrant of the femoral head–neck
junction for FAI significantly reduces the load-bearing capacity
of the proximal femur. After initial resection of cortical bone,
there is no further relevant loss of stability regardless of the
amount of trabecular bone resected. Based on our findings we recommend any patients who undergo anterolateral
femoral head–neck junction osteoplasty should be advised to modify
their post-operative routine until cortical remodelling occurs to
minimise the subsequent fracture risk. Cite this article: