Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip (MoMHR)
has enjoyed a resurgence in the last decade, but is now again in question
as a routine option for osteoarthritis of the hip. Proponents of
hip resurfacing suggest that its survival is superior to that of
conventional hip replacement (THR), and that hip resurfacing is
less invasive, is easier to revise than THR, and provides superior
functional outcomes. Our argument serves to illustrate that none
of these proposed advantages have been realised and new and unanticipated
serious complications, such as pseudotumors, have been associated
with the procedure. As such, we feel that the routine use of MoMHR
is not justified. Cite this article:
Mechanical alignment has been a fundamental tenet of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) since modern knee replacement surgery was developed in the 1970s. The objective of mechanical alignment was to infer the greatest biomechanical advantage to the implant to prevent early loosening and failure. Over the last 40 years a great deal of innovation in TKA technology has been focusing on how to more accurately achieve mechanical alignment. Recently the concept of mechanical alignment has been challenged, and other alignment philosophies are being explored with the intention of trying to improve patient outcomes following TKA. This article examines the evolution of the mechanical alignment concept and whether there are any viable alternatives.
We systematically reviewed the peer-reviewed literature to relate the survival of hybrid metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty devices to a National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) benchmark for choosing a primary total hip replacement, which is a survival rate of 90% at a follow-up of ten years. A total of 29 articles (10 621 resurfaced hips) met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up ranged from 0.6 to 10.5 years and the survival of the implant ranged from 84% to 100%. Of the 10 621 hips, 370 were revised (3.5%), with aseptic loosening as the most frequent mode of failure. None of the hip resurfacing arthroplasty implants used to date met the full ten-year NICE benchmark of survival. A total of 13 studies showed satisfactory survival compared with the three-year NICE benchmark.
