The June 2012 Shoulder &
Elbow Roundup360 looks at: reverse shoulder replacement; torn rotator cuffs and platelet-rich fibrin; rotator cuff repair; frozen shoulder; whether an arthroscopic rotator cuff repair actually heals; the torn rotator cuff’s effect on activities of daily living; subacromial impingement; how to improve the reliability of the Constant-Murley score; and failure of the Neer modification of an open Bankart procedure.
The aim of this study was to assess hypertrophy of the extra-articular
tendon of the long head of biceps (LHB) in patients with a rotator
cuff tear. The study involved 638 shoulders in 334 patients (175 men, 159
women, mean age 62.6 years; 25 to 81) with unilateral symptomatic
rotator cuff tears. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the LHB tendon
in the bicipital groove was measured pre-operatively in both shoulders
using ultrasound. There were 154 asymptomatic rotator cuff tears
in the contralateral shoulder. Comparisons were made between those
with a symptomatic tear, an asymptomatic tear and those with no
rotator cuff tear. In the affected shoulders, the CSAs were compared
in relation to the location and size of the rotator cuff tear. Aims
Patients and Methods
The April 2014 Shoulder &
Elbow Roundup360 looks at: arthroscopic capsular release successful after six months; MCIC in cuff surgery; analgesia following arthroscopic cuff repair; platelet-rich fibrin; and cuff tear and suprascapular nerve neuropathy?
This study compared the clinical outcomes following
mini-open rotator cuff repair (MORCR) between early mobilisation
and usual care, involving initial immobilisation. In total, 189
patients with radiologically-confirmed full-thickness rotator cuff
tears underwent MORCR and were randomised to either early mobilisation
(n = 97) or standard rehabilitation (n = 92) groups. Patients were
assessed at six weeks and three, six, 12 and 24 months post-operatively.
Six-week range of movement comparisons demonstrated significantly
increased abduction (p = 0.002) and scapular plane elevation (p
= 0.006) in the early mobilisation group, an effect which was not
detectable at three months (p >
0.51) or afterwards. At 24 months
post-operatively, patients who performed pain-free, early active mobilisation
for activities of daily living showed no difference in clinical
outcomes from patients immobilised for six weeks following MORCR.
We suggest that the choice of rehabilitation regime following MORCR
may be left to the discretion of the patient and the treating surgeon. Cite this article:
We assessed the clinical results, radiographic
outcomes and complications of patients undergoing total shoulder replacement
(TSR) for osteoarthritis with concurrent repair of a full-thickness
rotator cuff tear. Between 1996 and 2010, 45 of 932 patients (4.8%)
undergoing TSR for osteoarthritis underwent rotator cuff repair.
The final study group comprised 33 patients with a mean follow-up
of 4.7 years (3 months to 13 years). Tears were classified into small
(10), medium (14), large (9) or massive (0). On a scale of 1 to
5, pain decreased from a mean of 4.7 to 1.7 (p = <
0.0001), the
mean forward elevation improved from 99° to 139° (p = <
0.0001),
and the mean external rotation improved from 20° (0° to 75°) to
49° (20° to 80°) (p = <
0.0001). The improvement in elevation
was greater in those with a small tear (p = 0.03). Radiographic
evidence of instability developed in six patients with medium or
large tears, indicating lack of rotator cuff healing. In all, six
glenoid components, including one with instability, were radiologically
at risk of loosening. Complications were noted in five patients,
all with medium or large tears; four of these had symptomatic instability
and one sustained a late peri-prosthetic fracture. Four patients
(12%) required further surgery, three with instability and one with
a peri-prosthetic humeral fracture. Consideration should be given to performing rotator cuff repair
for stable shoulders during anatomical TSR, but reverse replacement
should be considered for older, less active patients with larger
tears. Cite this article:
This study evaluates the position of the long
head of biceps tendon using ultrasound following simple tenotomy,
in patients with arthroscopically repaired rotator cuff tears. In total, 52 patients with a mean age of 60.7 years (45 to 75)
underwent arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff and simple tenotomy
of the long head of biceps tendon. At two years post-operatively,
ultrasound revealed that the tendon was inside the bicipital groove
in 43 patients (82.7%) and outside in nine (17.3%); in six of these
it was lying just outside the groove and in the remaining three
(5.8%) it was in a remote position with a positive Popeye Sign.
A dynamic ultrasound scan revealed that the tenotomised tendons
had adhered to the surrounding tissues (autotenodesis).The initial
condition of the tendon influenced its final position (p <
0.0005).
The presence of a Popeye sign was statistically influenced by the
pre-operative co-existence of supraspinatus and subscapularis tears (p
<
0.0001). It appears that the natural history of the tenotomised long head
of biceps tendon is to tenodese itself inside or just outside the
bicipital groove, while its pre-operative condition and coexistent
subscapularis tears play a significant role in the occurrence of
a Popeye sign.
Rotator cuff tears are among the most common and debilitating
upper extremity injuries. Chronic cuff tears result in atrophy and
an infiltration of fat into the muscle, a condition commonly referred
to as ‘fatty degeneration’. While stem cell therapies hold promise
for the treatment of cuff tears, a suitable immunodeficient animal
model that could be used to study human or other xenograft-based
therapies for the treatment of rotator cuff injuries had not previously
been identified. A full-thickness, massive supraspinatus and infraspinatus tear
was induced in adult T-cell deficient rats. We hypothesised that,
compared with controls, 28 days after inducing a tear we would observe
a decrease in muscle force production, an accumulation of type IIB
fibres, and an upregulation in the expression of genes involved
with muscle atrophy, fibrosis and inflammation.Objectives
Methods
The August 2012 Shoulder &
Elbow Roundup360 looks at: platelet-rich fibrin matrix and the torn rotator cuff; ultrasound, trainees, and ducks out of water; the torn rotator cuff and conservative treatment; Bankart repair and subsequent degenerative change; proprioception after shoulder replacement; surgery for a terrible triad, with reasonable short-term results; and the WORC Index.
Impingement syndrome in the shoulder has generally been considered to be a clinical condition of mechanical origin. However, anomalies exist between the pathology in the subacromial space and the degree of pain experienced. These may be explained by variations in the processing of nociceptive inputs between different patients. We investigated the evidence for augmented pain transmission (central sensitisation) in patients with impingement, and the relationship between pre-operative central sensitisation and the outcomes following arthroscopic subacromial decompression. We recruited 17 patients with unilateral impingement of the shoulder and 17 age- and gender-matched controls, all of whom underwent quantitative sensory testing to detect thresholds for mechanical stimuli, distinctions between sharp and blunt punctate stimuli, and heat pain. Additionally Oxford shoulder scores to assess pain and function, and PainDETECT questionnaires to identify ‘neuropathic’ and referred symptoms were completed. Patients completed these questionnaires pre-operatively and three months post-operatively. A significant proportion of patients awaiting subacromial decompression had referred pain radiating down the arm and had significant hyperalgesia to punctate stimulus of the skin compared with controls (unpaired The presence of either hyperalgesia or referred pain pre-operatively resulted in a significantly worse outcome from decompression three months after surgery (unpaired These observations confirm the presence of central sensitisation in a proportion of patients with shoulder pain associated with impingement. Also, if patients had relatively high levels of central sensitisation pre-operatively, as indicated by higher levels of punctate hyperalgesia and/or referred pain, the outcome three months after subacromial decompression was significantly worse.
This study was performed to review the safety and outcome of total shoulder replacements in patients who are ≥ 80 years of age. A total of 50 total shoulder replacements in 44 patients at a mean age of 82 years (80 to 89) were studied. Their health and shoulder status, the operation and post-operative course were analysed, including pain, movement, patient satisfaction, medical and surgical complications, radiographs, the need for revision surgery, and implant and patient survival. A total of 27 patients had an ASA classification of III or IV and medical abnormalities were common. Of the 13 shoulders with bony deficiency of the glenoid, nine required grafting. The duration of hospital stay was prolonged and blood transfusions were common. There were no peri-operative deaths. The mean follow-up was for 5.5 years (2 to 12). Pain was significantly reduced (p <
0.001) and movement improved in active elevation and both external and internal rotation (p <
0.001). Using the Neer scale for assessing outcome, 40 (80%) shoulders had an excellent or satisfactory result. There were medical or surgical complications in 17 cases. Four shoulders developed radiological evidence of loosened glenoid components, and three of these had a poor outcome. Three other shoulders required revision, two for instability. By the time of this review 39 of the patients had died from unrelated causes at a mean of 7.5 years (0.8 to 16.4) after surgery. Total shoulder replacement is a relatively effective treatment in this elderly group of patients. However, there is a requirement for more intense patient care in the peri-operative period, and non-fatal medical or surgical complications are common. Most of these elderly patients will have a comfortable functional shoulder for the rest of their lives.
We compared the outcome of arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff in 32 diabetic patients with the outcome in 32 non-diabetic patients matched for age, gender, size of tear and comorbidities. The Constant-Murley score improved from a mean of 49.2 (24 to 80) pre-operatively to 60.8 (34 to 95) post-operatively (p = 0.0006) in the diabetic patients, and from 46.4 (23 to 90) pre-operatively to 65.2 (25 to 100) post-operatively (p = 0.0003) in the non-diabetic patients at six months. This was significantly greater (p = 0.0002) in non-diabetic patients (18.8) than in diabetics (11.6). There was no significant change in the mean mental component of the Short-Form 12, but the mean physical component increased from 35 to 41 in non-diabetics (p = 0.0001), and from 37 to 39 (p = 0.15) in diabetics. These trends were observed at one year. Patients with diabetes showed improvement of pain and function following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in the short term, but less than their non-diabetic counterparts.
We identified ten patients who underwent arthroscopic revision of anterior shoulder stabilisation between 1999 and 2005. Their results were compared with 15 patients, matched for age and gender, who had a primary arthroscopic stabilisation during the same period. At a mean follow-up of 37 and 36 months, respectively, the scores for pain and shoulder function improved significantly between the pre-operative and follow-up visits in both groups (p = 0.002), with no significant difference between them (p = 0.4). The UCLA and Rowe shoulder scores improved significantly (p = 0.004 and p = 0.002, respectively), with no statistically significant differences between groups (p = 0.6). Kaplan-Meier analysis for time to recurrent instability showed no differences between the groups (p = 0.2). These results suggest that arthroscopic revision anterior shoulder stabilisation is as reliable as primary arthroscopic stabilisation for patients who have had previous open surgery for recurrent anterior instability.