The objective of this study was to assess all evidence comparing the Thompson monoblock hemiarthroplasty with modular unipolar implants for patients requiring hemiarthroplasty of the hip with respect to mortality and complications. A literature search was performed to identify all relevant literature. The population consisted of patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty of the hip for fracture. The intervention was hemiarthroplasty of the hip with a comparison between Thompson and modular unipolar prostheses. Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PROSPERO and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The study designs included were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), well designed case control studies and retrospective or prospective cohort studies. Studies available in any language, published at any time until September 2015 were considered. Studies were included if they contained mortality or complications.Objectives
Methods
We present the clinical and radiographic outcome of 81 children
with Gartland type I to III supracondylar humeral fractures at a
minimum follow-up of ten years (mean 12.1 years; 10.3 to 16.1) following
injury. The clinical and functional outcomes are compared with normal
age- and gender-matched individuals. The population-based study
setting was first identified from the institutional registries;
the rate of participation was 76%. Controls were randomly selected
from Finnish National Population Registry.Aims
Patients and Methods
Fractures of the distal femur are an important cause of morbidity.
Their optimal management remains controversial. Contemporary implants
include angular-stable anatomical locking plates and locked intramedullary
nails (IMNs). We compared the long-term patient-reported functional
outcome of fixation of fractures of the distal femur using these
two methods of treatment. A total of 297 patients were retrospectively identified from
a State-wide trauma registry in Australia: 195 had been treated
with a locking plate and 102 with an IMN. Baseline characteristics
of the patients and their fractures were recorded. Health-related
quality-of-life, functional and radiographic outcomes were compared
using mixed effects regression models at six months and one year.Aims
Patients and Methods
Injuries to the foot in athletes are often subtle
and can lead to a substantial loss of function if not diagnosed
and treated appropriately. For these injuries in general, even after
a diagnosis is made, treatment options are controversial and become
even more so in high level athletes where limiting the time away
from training and competition is a significant consideration. In this review, we cover some of the common and important sporting
injuries affecting the foot including updates on their management
and outcomes. Cite this article:
This study describes the epidemiology and outcome
of 637 proximal humeral fractures in 629 elderly (≥ 65 years old) patients.
Most were either minimally displaced (n = 278, 44%) or two-part
fractures (n = 250, 39%) that predominantly occurred in women (n
= 525, 82%) after a simple fall (n = 604, 95%), who lived independently
in their own home (n = 560, 88%), and one in ten sustained a concomitant
fracture (n = 76, 11.9%). The rate of mortality at one year was
10%, with the only independent predictor of survival being whether
the patient lived in their own home (p = 0.025). Many factors associated
with the patient’s social independence significantly influenced
the age and gender adjusted Constant score one year after the fracture.
More than a quarter of the patients had a poor functional outcome,
with those patients not living in their own home (p = 0.04), participating
in recreational activities (p = 0.01), able to perform their own
shopping (p <
0.001), or able to dress themselves (p = 0.02)
being at a significantly increased risk of a poor outcome, which
was independent of the severity of the fracture (p = 0.001). A poor functional outcome after a proximal humeral fracture is
not independently influenced by age in the elderly, and factors
associated with social independence are more predictive of outcome. Cite this article:
Failed internal fixation of a fracture of the
proximal humerus produces many challenges with limited surgical options.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes after
the use of a reverse shoulder arthroplasty under these circumstances.
Between 2007 and 2012, 19 patients (15 women and four men, mean
age 66 years; 52 to 82) with failed internal fixation after a proximal
humeral fracture, underwent implant removal and reverse shoulder arthroplasty
(RSA). The mean follow-up was 36 months (25 to 60). The mean American
Shoulder and Elbow Score improved from 27.8 to 50.1 (p = 0.019).
The mean Simple Shoulder Test score improved from 0.7 to 3.2 (p
= 0.020), and the mean visual analogue scale for pain improved from
6.8 to 4.3 (p = 0.012). Mean forward flexion improved from 58.7°
to 101.1° (p <
0.001), mean abduction from 58.7° to 89.1° (p
= 0.012), mean external rotation from 10.7° to 23.1° (p = 0.043)
and mean internal rotation from buttocks to L4 (p = 0.034). A major
complication was recorded in five patients (26%) (one intra-operative
fracture, loosening of the humeral component in two and two peri-prosthetic
fractures). A total of 15 patients (79%) rated their outcome as
excellent or good, one (5%) as satisfactory, and three (16%) as
unsatisfactory. An improvement in outcomes and pain can be expected when performing
a RSA as a salvage procedure after failed internal fixation of a
fracture of the proximal humerus. Patients should be cautioned about
the possibility for major complications following this technically
demanding procedure. Cite this article:
We compared a new fixation system, the Targon
Femoral Neck (TFN) hip screw, with the current standard treatment of
cannulated screw fixation. This was a single-centre, participant-blinded,
randomised controlled trial. Patients aged 65 years and over with
either a displaced or undisplaced intracapsular fracture of the
hip were eligible. The primary outcome was the risk of revision
surgery within one year of fixation. A total of 174 participants were included in the trial. The absolute
reduction in risk of revision was of 4.7% (95% CI 14.2 to 22.5)
in favour of the TFN hip screw (chi-squared test, p = 0.741), which
was less than the pre-specified level of minimum clinically important
difference. There were no significant differences in any of the
secondary outcome measures. We found no evidence of a clinical difference in the risk of
revision surgery between the TFN hip screw and cannulated screw
fixation for patients with an intracapsular fracture of the hip. Cite this article:
We welcome letters to the Editor concerning articles
that have recently been published. Such letters will be subject
to the usual stages of selection and editing; where appropriate the
authors of the original article will be offered the opportunity
to reply.
The December 2015 Shoulder &
Elbow Roundup360 looks at:
Only a few randomised, controlled studies have
compared different non-operative methods of treatment of mid-shaft
fractures of the clavicle. In this prospective, randomised controlled study of 60 participants
(mean age 31.6 years; 15 to 75) we compared the broad arm sling
with the figure of eight bandage for the treatment of mid-shaft
clavicle fractures. Our outcome measures were pain, Constant and
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores and radiological union. The mean visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score on the first
day after treatment was significantly higher (VAS 1 6.8; 4 to 9)
in the figure of eight bandage group than the broad arm sling group
(VAS 1 5.6; 3 to 8, p = 0.034). A mean shortening of 9 mm (3 to
17) was measured in the figure of eight bandage group, The application of the figure of eight bandage is more difficult
than of the broad arm sling, and patients experience more pain during
the first day when treated with this option. We suggest the broad
arm sling is preferable because of the reduction of early pain and
ease of application. Cite this article:
We reviewed 101 patients with injuries of the
terminal branches of the infraclavicular brachial plexus sustained between
1997 and 2009. Four patterns of injury were identified: 1) anterior
glenohumeral dislocation (n = 55), in which the axillary and ulnar
nerves were most commonly injured, but the axillary nerve was ruptured
in only two patients (3.6%); 2) axillary nerve injury, with or without
injury to other nerves, in the absence of dislocation of the shoulder
(n = 20): these had a similar pattern of nerve involvement to those
with a known dislocation, but the axillary nerve was ruptured in
14 patients (70%); 3) displaced proximal humeral fracture (n = 15),
in which nerve injury resulted from medial displacement of the humeral
shaft: the fracture was surgically reduced in 13 patients; and 4) hyperextension
of the arm (n = 11): these were characterised by disruption of the
musculocutaneous nerve. There was variable involvement of the median
and radial nerves with the ulnar nerve being least affected. Surgical intervention is not needed in most cases of infraclavicular
injury associated with dislocation of the shoulder. Early exploration
of the nerves should be considered in patients with an axillary
nerve palsy without dislocation of the shoulder and for musculocutaneous
nerve palsy with median and/or radial nerve palsy. Urgent operation
is needed in cases of nerve injury resulting from fracture of the
humeral neck to relieve pressure on nerves.