The April 2014 Spine Roundup360 looks at: medical treatment for ankylosing spondylitis; unilateral TLIF effective; peg fractures akin to neck of femur fractures; sleep apnoea and spinal surgery; scoliosis in osteogenesis imperfect; paediatric atlanto-occipital dislocation; back pain and obesity: chicken or egg?; BMP associated with lumbar plexus deficit; and just how common is back pain?
Controversy remains whether the contralateral
hip should be fixed in patients presenting with unilateral slipped capital
femoral epiphysis (SCFE). This retrospective study compares the
outcomes and cost of those patients who had prophylactic fixation
with those who did not. Between January 2000 and December 2010 a total of 50 patients
underwent unilateral fixation and 36 had prophylactic fixation of
the contralateral hip. There were 54 males and 32 females with a
mean age of 12.3 years (9 to 16). The rate of a subsequent slip
without prophylactic fixation was 46%. The risk of complications
was greater, the generic health measures (Short Form-12 physical
(p <
0.001) and mental (p = 0.004) summary scores) were worse.
Radiographic cam lesions in patients presenting with unilateral
SCFE were only seen in patients who did not have prophylactic fixation.
Furthermore, prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip was
found to be a cost-effective procedure, with a cost per quality
adjusted life year gained of £1431 at the time of last follow-up. Prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip is a cost-effective
operation that limits the morbidity from the complications of a
further slip, and the diminished functional outcome associated with
unilateral fixation. Cite this article:
The June 2015 Spine Roundup360 looks at: Less is more in pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis; Paracetamol out of favour in spinal pain but effective for osteoarthritis; Local wound irrigation to reduce infection?; Lumbar facet joint effusion: a reliable prognostic sign?; SPORT for the octogenarian; Neurological deterioration following traumatic spinal cord injury; PROMS in spinal surgery
Hip fracture is a common injury associated with
high mortality, long-term disability and huge socio-economic burden.
Yet there has been relatively little research into best treatment,
and evidence that has been generated has often been criticised for
its poor quality. Here, we discuss the advances made towards overcoming
these criticisms and the future directions for hip fracture research:
how co-ordinating existing national infrastructures and use of now
established clinical research networks will likely go some way towards
overcoming the practical and financial challenges of conducting
large trials. We highlight the importance of large collaborative
pragmatic trials to inform decision/policy makers and the progress
made towards reaching a consensus on a core outcome set to facilitate data
pooling for evidence synthesis and meta-analysis. These advances and future directions are a priority in order
to establish the high-quality evidence base required for this important
group of patients. Cite this article:
The June 2015 Foot &
Ankle Roundup360 looks at: Syndesmosis and outcomes in ankle fracture; Ankle arthrodesis or arthroplasty: a complications-based analysis; Crosslinked polyethylene and ankle arthroplasty; Reducing screw removal in calcaneal osteotomies; Revisiting infection control policies; Chevron osteotomy: proximal or distal?; Ankle distraction for osteoarthritis
Clinical studies evaluating the effects of vitamin D alone or in combination with calcium on physical function, falls and fractures have been inconsistent. Vitamin D has, however, been the focus of much orthopaedic, trauma and endocrine research. Playing a central role in muscle and bone metabolism, some studies on Vitamin D therapies offer the tantalising suggestion of a reduction in falls and fractures simply with vitamin D supplementation. We review the background and evidence behind vitamin D.
This article presents an overview of mycetoma
and offers guidelines for orthopaedic surgeons who may be involved in
the care of patients with this condition. Cite this article:
The February 2014 Shoulder &
Elbow Roundup360 looks at: whether arthroscopic acromioplasty is a cost-effective intervention; shockwave therapy in cuff tear; whether microfracture relieves short-term pain in cuff repair; the promising early results from L-PRF augmented cuff repairs; rehabilitation following cuff repair; supination strength following biceps tendon rupture; whether longer is better in humeral components; fatty degeneration in a rodent model; and the controversial acromioclavicular joint dislocation.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs ) are small non-coding RNAs
that regulate gene expression. We hypothesised that the functions
of certain miRNAs and changes to their patterns of expression may
be crucial in the pathogenesis of nonunion. Healing fractures and
atrophic nonunions produced by periosteal cauterisation were created
in the femora of 94 rats, with 1:1 group allocation. At post-fracture
days three, seven, ten, 14, 21 and 28, miRNAs were extracted from
the newly generated tissue at the fracture site. Microarray and
real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analyses of day 14 samples
revealed that five miRNAs, miR-31a-3p, miR-31a-5p, miR-146a-5p,
miR-146b-5p and miR-223-3p, were highly upregulated in nonunion.
Real-time PCR analysis further revealed that, in nonunion, the expression
levels of all five of these miRNAs peaked on day 14 and declined
thereafter. Our results suggest that miR-31a-3p, miR-31a-5p, miR-146a-5p,
miR-146b-5p and miR-223-3p may play an important role in the development
of nonunion. These findings add to the understanding of the molecular mechanism
for nonunion formation and may lead to the development of novel
therapeutic strategies for its treatment. Cite this article:
This is the second of a series of reviews of registries. This review looks specifically at worldwide registry data that have been collected on knee arthroplasty, what we have learned from their reports, and what the limitations are as to what we currently know.
The April 2015 Foot &
Ankle Roundup360 looks at: Plantar pressures linked to radiographs; Strength training for ankle instability?; Is weight loss good for your feet?; Diabetes and foot surgery complications; Tantalum for failed ankle arthroplasty?; Steroids, costs and Morton’s neuroma; Ankle arthritis and subtalar joint
Fractures of the proximal femur are one of the
greatest challenges facing the medical community, constituting a
heavy socioeconomic burden worldwide. Controversy exists regarding
the optimal treatment for independent patients with displaced intracapsular fractures
of the proximal femur. The recognised alternatives are hemiarthroplasty
and total hip replacement. At present there is no established standard
of care, with both types of arthroplasty being used in many centres.
The principal advantages of total hip replacement are a functional
benefit over hemiarthroplasty and a reduced risk of revision surgery.
The principal criticism is the increased risk of dislocation. We
believe that an alternative acetabular component may reduce the
risk of dislocation but still provide the functional benefit of
total hip replacement in these patients. We therefore propose to
investigate the dislocation risk of a dual-mobility acetabular component
compared with standard polyethylene component in total hip replacement
for independent patients with displaced intracapsular fractures
of the proximal femur within the framework of the larger WHiTE (Warwick
Hip Trauma Evaluation) Comprehensive Cohort Study. Cite this article:
The April 2015 Knee Roundup360 looks at: Genetic determinants of ACL strength; TKA outcomes influenced by prosthesis; Single- or two-stage revision for infected TKA?; Arthroscopic meniscectomy: a problem that just won’t go away!; Failure in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction; ACL reconstruction in the over 50s?; Knee arthroplasty for early osteoarthritis; All inside meniscal repair; Steroids, thrombogenic markers and TKA
The aim of this study was to evaluate the ten-year
clinical and functional outcome of hip resurfacing and to compare it
with that of cementless hip arthroplasty in patients under the age
of 55 years. Between 1999 and 2002, 80 patients were enrolled into the study:
24 were randomised (11 to hip resurfacing, 13 to total hip arthroplasty),
18 refused hip resurfacing and chose cementless total hip arthroplasty
with a 32 mm bearing, and 38 insisted on resurfacing. The mean follow-up
for all patients was 12.1 years (10 to 14). Patients were assessed clinically and radiologically at one year,
five years and ten years. Outcome measures included EuroQol EQ5D,
Oxford, Harris hip, University of California Los Angeles and University
College Hospital functional scores. No differences were seen between the two groups in the Oxford
or Harris hip scores or in the quality of life scores. Despite a
similar aspiration to activity pre-operatively, a higher proportion
of patients with a hip resurfacing were running and involved in
sport and heavy manual labour after ten years. We found significantly higher function scores in patients who
had undergone hip resurfacing than in those with a cementless hip
arthroplasty at ten years. This suggests a functional advantage
for hip resurfacing. There were no other attendant problems. Cite this article:
The February 2015 Spine Roundup360 looks at: Paracetamol use for lower back pain; En-bloc resection of vertebra reported for the first time; Spinopelvic disassociation under the spotlight; Hope for back pain; Disc replacement and ACDF equivalent in randomised study; Interspinous process devices ineffective
The February 2015 Foot &
Ankle Roundup360 looks at: Syndesmosis screw removal in randomised controlled trial; Diagnostic value of Hawkins sign; Chevron rules supreme?; Diabetes and ankle replacement; Fixed-bearing ankle replacement; Fusion for osteomyelitis of the ankle; ‘Reformed’ fallers.
We assessed the frequency and causes of neurological
deterioration in 59 patients with spinal cord injury on whom reports
were prepared for clinical negligence litigation. In those who deteriorated
neurologically we assessed the causes of the change in neurology
and whether that neurological deterioration was potentially preventable.
In all 27 patients (46%) changed neurologically, 20 patients (74%
of those who deteriorated) had no primary neurological deficit.
Of those who deteriorated, 13 (48%) became Frankel A. Neurological
deterioration occurred in 23 of 38 patients (61%) with unstable
fractures and/or dislocations; all 23 patients probably deteriorated
either because of failures to immobilise the spine or because of
inappropriate removal of spinal immobilisation. Of the 27 patients who
altered neurologically, neurological deterioration was, probably,
avoidable in 25 (excess movement in 23 patients with unstable injuries,
failure to evacuate an epidural haematoma in one patient and over-distraction following
manipulation of the cervical spine in one patient). If existing
guidelines and standards for the management of actual or potential
spinal cord injury had been followed, neurological deterioration
would have been prevented in 25 of the 27 patients (93%) who experienced
a deterioration in their neurological status. Cite this article:
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed
the efficacy of bracing for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis have suffered
from small sample sizes, low compliance and lack of willingness
to participate. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility
of a comprehensive cohort study for evaluating both the efficacy
and the effectiveness of bracing in patients with adolescent idiopathic
scoliosis. Patients with curves at greater risk of progression were invited
to join a randomised controlled trial. Those who declined were given
the option to remain in the study and to choose whether they wished
to be braced or observed. Of 87 eligible patients (5 boys and 63
girls) identified over one year, 68 (78%) with mean age of 12.5
years (10 to 15) consented to participate, with a mean follow-up
of 168 weeks (0 to 290). Of these, 19 (28%) accepted randomisation.
Of those who declined randomisation, 18 (37%) chose a brace. Patients
who were more satisfied with their image were more likely to choose
bracing (Odds Ratio 4.1; 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 15.0; p = 0.035).
This comprehensive cohort study design facilitates the assessment
of both efficacy and effectiveness of bracing in patients with adolescent
idiopathic scoliosis, which is not feasible in a conventional randomised
controlled trial. Cite this article:
