Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 721 - 740 of 8513
Results per page:
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 88-B, Issue 1 | Pages 95 - 99
1 Jan 2006
Ramseier LE Malinin TI Temple HT Mnaymneh WA Exner GU

The outcome of tibial allograft reconstruction after resection of a tumour is inconsistent and has a high rate of failure. There are few reports on the use of tibial allografts in children with open growth plates. We performed 21 allograft reconstructions (16 osteoarticular, five intercalary) in 19 consecutive patients between seven and 17 years of age. Two had Ewing’s sarcoma, one an adamantinoma and 16 osteosarcoma, one with multifocal disease.

Five patients have died; the other 14 were free from disease at the time of follow-up. Six surviving patients (eight allograft reconstructions) continue to have good or excellent function at a mean of 59 months (14 to 132). One patient has poor function at 31 months. The other seven patients have a good or excellent function after additional procedures including exchange of the allograft and resurfacing or revision to an endoprosthesis at a mean of 101 months (43 to 198). The additional operations were performed at a mean of 47 months (20 to 84) after the first reconstruction.

With the use of allograft reconstruction in growing children, joints and growth plates may be preserved, at least partially. Although our results remain inconsistent, tibial allograft reconstruction in selected patients may restore complete and durable function of the limb.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 79-B, Issue 2 | Pages 178 - 180
1 Mar 1997
Norman-Taylor FH Villar RN


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 78-B, Issue 6 | Pages 861 - 862
1 Nov 1996
Fulford P Lidgren L


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 78-B, Issue 2 | Pages 258 - 263
1 Mar 1996
Kreicbergs A Bauer HCF Brosjö O Lindholm J Skoog L Söderlund V

We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration biopsy in a prospective study of 300 patients with previously undiagnosed bone lesions. Patients with suspected local recurrence of a primary bone tumour or a metastatic lesion of a previously diagnosed malignancy were excluded. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy was performed under radiological control as an outpatient procedure.

The series was grouped into three major categories: 1) benign bone lesions including infections; 2) primary malignant bone tumours; and 3) metastases including lymphomas and myelomas. We compared the cytological diagnosis with the final diagnosis as assessed by histological examination and/or the clinical and radiological features.

Material considered conclusive for cytological diagnosis was obtained from 251 of the 300 patients. Of the 49 failures, there were 24 aspirates with insufficient cellular yield and 25 in which a diagnosis could not be made although the cytological material was adequate in quantity. Most of the inconclusive aspirates (36/49) were obtained from benign bone lesions.

The diagnosis was correct in 239 (95%) of the 251 cases providing adequate cytological material. There were eight (3%) falsely benign diagnoses, one (0.3%) falsely malignant, and three cases in which we were unable to differentiate between sarcoma and a metastasis. Chondrosarcoma (2/12) gave the greatest diagnostic difficulty and Ewing’s sarcoma the least (0/9). There were no decisive errors of treatment. All falsely benign or malignant diagnoses were questioned, and led to open biopsy since they did not correlate with the clinical and radiological features.

Our study suggests that fine-needle aspiration biopsy is a valid option for the diagnosis of bone tumours. It is a simple outpatient procedure which gives sufficient cytological material for the correct diagnosis in 80% of cases. As with histological analysis of material from open biopsy, the cytological assessment must agree with the clinical and radiological findings.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 78-B, Issue 1 | Pages 166 - 166
1 Jan 1996
PLANES A VOCHELLE N


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 77-B, Issue 5 | Pages 673 - 674
1 Sep 1995
Smith R


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 76-B, Issue 1 | Pages 163 - 163
1 Jan 1994
Scapinelli R


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 70-B, Issue 1 | Pages 85 - 88
1 Jan 1988
Barbos M

Three madreporic prostheses in two patients were examined to evaluate resorption and formation of the surrounding bone tissue. All three prostheses were firmly fixed and had no clinical or radiographic signs of loosening. Transverse sections were examined by scanning electron microscopy at 40 days, 11 months and 2.5 years after implantation. The findings suggest that adaptive bone remodelling varies along the length of the stem; that bone resorption and formation are related to the time after implant; and that new bone formation (woven bone) can be found very close to the madreporic surface.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 63-B, Issue 2 | Pages 254 - 256
1 May 1981
Van den Bout A Dreyer L


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 60-B, Issue 2 | Pages 150 - 162
1 May 1978
McKibbin B


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 56-B, Issue 3 | Pages 594 - 595
1 Aug 1974
Murray RO


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 55-B, Issue 4 | Pages 891 - 892
1 Nov 1973
Duthie RB


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 55-B, Issue 4 | Pages 891 - 891
1 Nov 1973
Zilva JF


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 55-B, Issue 2 | Pages 350 - 356
1 May 1973
Sybrandy S de la Fuente AA

1. A case is described of three giant-cell tumours, the first in 1966 in the lower left femur, the second in 1968 in the upper right femur, the third later in 1968 in the upper left femur.

2. None of the tumours could be described as frankly malignant.

3. Despite a lapse of four years it is still not possible to decide whether the first tumour had metastasised or whether all three arose independently by multifocal origin.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 55-B, Issue 1 | Pages 240 - 240
1 Feb 1973
Ball J


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 52-B, Issue 2 | Pages 400 - 401
1 May 1970
Sweetnam R


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 52-B, Issue 1 | Pages 197 - 197
1 Feb 1970
Fairbank TJ


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 50-B, Issue 4 | Pages 698 - 700
1 Nov 1968
Scales JT


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 50-B, Issue 3 | Pages 687 - 687
1 Aug 1968
Golding C


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 50-B, Issue 1 | Pages 242 - 243
1 Feb 1968
Freeman MAR