Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia (CPT)
is a rare but well recognised condition. Obtaining union of the pseudarthrosis
in these children is often difficult and may require several surgical
procedures. The treatment has changed significantly since the review
by Hardinge in 1972, but controversies continue as to the best form
of surgical treatment. This paper reviews these controversies. Cite this article:
1. Three cases of
In a retrospective review of 302 clinically suspected cases of
A total of 38 relapsed
Comparisons were made between 54 children with resolving
1. The problem of instability of reduction in
We have reviewed the results in 37 patients with unilateral
A long-term review of 131 children fitted with upper limb prostheses at the Ontario Crippled Children's Centre between 1965 and 1975 is reported. There were 116 children with
Van Nes rotationplasty may be used for patients
with
We report a prospective study of the feasibility of employing specially trained physiotherapists to screen neonates for
The hips of twenty full-term African neonates have been examined in detail to determine any anatomical factors which might explain the difference in the incidence of
The term "congenital scoliosis" contributes little to our understanding of aetiology, for "congenital" simply means "to be born with" and is applicable to deformities present at birth whether these are genetically determined or acquired in utero. The presentation of monozygotic twins, one of whom has
Thirteen patients with
We reviewed the serial radiographs of 54 hips in 47 children treated by closed reduction for
Operative correction of
We report on a radiographic screening programme at four months of age for infants who were clinically normal at neonatal examination but were considered to be 'at risk' for
We reviewed 33 patients (35 hips) after open reduction of
1. A case of
A review of seventy-one children with sacral anomalies is presented. The aetiology is discussed and a classification of sacral anomalies is suggested, with three groups of patients: agenetic, dysgenetic and dysraphic. The clinical presentation of each group is discussed and the high incidence of
Seventy patients with 91