We present the clinical and radiological results at a minimum
follow-up of five years for patients who have undergone multiple
cement-in-cement revisions of their femoral component at revision
total hip arthroplasty (THA). We reviewed the outcome on a consecutive series of 24 patients
(10 men, 14 women) (51 procedures) who underwent more than one cement-in-cement
revision of the same femoral component. The mean age of the patients was
67.5 years (36 to 92) at final follow-up. Function was assessed using the original Harris hip score (HHS),
Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and the Merle D’Aubigné Postel score (MDP).Aims
Patients and Methods
In 2005, we demonstrated that the polished triple-tapered
C-stem at two years had migrated distally and rotated internally.
From that series, 33 patients have now been followed radiologically,
clinically and by radiostereometric analysis (RSA) for up to ten
years. The distal migration within the cement mantle had continued
and reached a mean of 2 mm (0.5 to 4.0) at ten years. Internal rotation,
also within the cement mantle, was a mean 3.8° (external 1.6° to
internal 6.6°) The cement mantle did not show any sign of migration
or loosening in relation to the femoral bone. There were no clinical
or radiological signs indicating that the migration or rotation
within the cement mantle had had any adverse effects for the patients. Cite this article:
Studies reporting specifically on squeaking in total hip arthroplasty have focused on cementless, and not on hybrid, fixation. We hypothesised that the cement mantle of the femur might have a damping effect on the sound transmitted through the metal stem. The objective of this study was to test the effect of cement on sound propagation along different stem designs and under different fixation conditions. An Objectives
Methods
Approximately half of all hip fractures are displaced intracapsular fractures. The standard treatment for these fractures is either hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty. The recent National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance on hip fracture management recommends the use of ‘proven’ cemented stem arthroplasty with an Orthopaedic Device Evaluation Panel (ODEP) rating of at least 3B (97% survival at three years). The Thompsons prosthesis is currently lacking an ODEP rating despite over 50 years of clinical use, likely due to the paucity of implant survival data. Nationally, adherence to these guidelines is varied as there is debate as to which prosthesis optimises patient outcomes. This study design is a multi-centre, multi-surgeon, parallel, two arm, standard-of-care pragmatic randomised controlled trial. It will be embedded within the WHiTE Comprehensive Cohort Study (ISRCTN63982700). The main analysis is a two-way equivalence comparison between Hemi-Thompson and Hemi-Exeter polished taper with Unitrax head. Secondary outcomes will include radiological leg length discrepancy measured as per Bidwai and Willett, mortality, re-operation rate and indication for re-operation, length of index hospital stay and revision at four months. This study will be supplemented by the NHFD (National Hip Fracture Database) dataset.Background
Design
Many different lengths of stem are available
for use in primary total hip replacement, and the morphology of
the proximal femur varies greatly. The more recently developed shortened
stems provide a distribution of stress which closely mimics that
of the native femur. Shortening the femoral component potentially
comes at the cost of decreased initial stability. Clinical studies
on the performance of shortened cemented and cementless stems are promising,
although long-term follow-up studies are lacking. We provide an
overview of the current literature on the anatomical features of
the proximal femur and the biomechanical aspects and clinical outcomes
associated with the length of the femoral component in primary hip
replacement, and suggest a classification system for the length
of femoral stems. Cite this article:
The outcome of 219 revision total hip arthroplasties
(THAs) in 98 male and 121 female patients, using 137 long length
and 82 standard length cemented collarless double-taper femoral
stems in 211 patients, with a mean age of 72 years (30 to 90) and
mean follow-up of six years (two to 18) have been described previously.
We have extended the follow-up to a mean of 13 years (8 to 20) in
this cohort of patients in which the pre-operative bone deficiency Paprosky
grading was IIIA or worse in 79% and 73% of femurs with long and
standard stems, respectively. For the long stem revision group, survival to re-revision for
aseptic loosening at 14 years was 97% (95% confidence interval (CI)
91 to 100) and in patients aged >
70 years, survival was 100%. Two
patients (two revisions) were lost to follow-up and 86 patients
with 88 revisions had died. Worst-case analysis for survival to
re-revision for aseptic loosening at 14 years was 95% (95% CI 89
to 100) and 99% (95% CI 96 to 100) for patients aged >
70 years. One
additional long stem was classified as loose radiographically but
not revised. For the standard stem revision group, survival to re-revision
for aseptic loosening at 14 years was 91% (95% CI 83 to 99). No
patients were lost to follow-up and 49 patients with 51 hips had
died. No additional stems were classified as loose radiographically. Femoral revision using a cemented collarless double-taper stem,
particularly with a long length stem, and in patients aged >
70
years, continues to yield excellent results up to 20 years post-operatively,
including in hips with considerable femoral metaphyseal bone loss. Cite this article:
There is a North Atlantic divide, with cementless
femoral stems being used more frequently in the USA and cemented
stems being used more frequently in many countries in Europe. This
is primarily because different cemented stems have been used on
different sides of the Atlantic and the results of the cemented
stems in the US have often been poor, whereas the results of the
stems used in Europe have been good. In the National registers in
Europe, cemented stems have tended to achieve better results than
cementless. Cite this article:
To evaluate the outcomes of cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA)
following a fracture of the acetabulum, with evaluation of risk
factors and comparison with a patient group with no history of fracture. Between 1992 and 2016, 49 patients (33 male) with mean age of
57 years (25 to 87) underwent cemented THA at a mean of 6.5 years
(0.1 to 25) following acetabular fracture. A total of 38 had undergone
surgical fixation and 11 had been treated non-operatively; 13 patients
died at a mean of 10.2 years after THA (0.6 to 19). Patients were
assessed pre-operatively, at one year and at final follow-up (mean
9.1 years, 0.5 to 23) using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Implant
survivorship was assessed. An age and gender-matched cohort of THAs
performed for non-traumatic osteoarthritis (OA) or avascular necrosis
(AVN) (n = 98) were used to compare complications and patient-reported outcome
measures (PROMs).Aims
Patients and Methods
We prospectively followed 191 consecutive collarless
polished tapered (CPT) femoral stems, implanted in 175 patients
who had a mean age at operation of 64.5 years (21 to 85). At a mean
follow-up of 15.9 years (14 to 17.5), 86 patients (95 hips) were
still alive. The fate of all original stems is known. The 16-year
survivorship with re-operation for any reason was 80.7% (95% confidence
interval 72 to 89.4). There was no loss to follow-up, with clinical
data available on all 95 hips and radiological assessment performed
on 90 hips (95%). At latest follow-up, the mean Harris hip score
was 78 (28 to 100) and the mean Oxford hip score was 36 (15 to 48).
Stems subsided within the cement mantle, with a mean subsidence
of 2.1 mm (0.4 to 19.2). Among the original cohort, only one stem
(0.5%) has been revised due to aseptic loosening. In total seven
stems were revised for any cause, of which four revisions were required
for infection following revision of the acetabular component. A
total of 21 patients (11%) required some sort of revision procedure;
all except three of these resulted from failure of the acetabular
component. Cemented acetabular components had a significantly lower
revision burden (three hips, 2.7%) than Harris Galante uncemented
components (17 hips, 21.8%) (p <
0.001). The CPT stem continues to provide excellent radiological and
clinical outcomes at 15 years following implantation. Its results
are consistent with other polished tapered stem designs.
The aims of this study were to determine the clinical and radiographic
outcomes, implant survivorship, and complications of patients with
a history of poliomyelitis undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA)
in affected limbs and unaffected limbs of this same population. A retrospective review identified 51 patients (27 male and 24
female, 59 hips) with a mean age of 66 years (38 to 88) and with
the history of poliomyelitis who underwent THA for degenerative
arthritis between 1970 and 2012. Immigrant status, clinical outcomes,
radiographic results, implant survival, and complications were recorded.Aims
Patients and Methods
We report the results of 79 patients (81 hips)
who underwent impaction grafting at revision hip replacement using the
Exeter femoral stem. Their mean age was 64 years (31 to 83). According
to the Endoklinik classification, 20 hips had a type 2 bone defect,
40 had type 3, and 21 had type 4. The mean follow-up for unrevised
stems was 10.4 years (5 to 17). There were 12 re-operations due to intra- and post-operative
fractures, infection (one hip) and aseptic loosening (one hip).
All re-operations affected type 3 (6 hips) and 4 (6 hips) bone defects.
The survival rate for re-operation for any cause was 100% for type
2, 81.2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 67.1 to 95.3) for type 3,
and 70.8% (95% CI 51.1 to 90.5) for type 4 defects at 14 years.
The survival rate with further revision for aseptic loosening as
the end point was 98.6% (95% CI 95.8 to 100). The final clinical
score was higher for patients with type 2 bone defects than type
4 regarding pain, function and range of movement. Limp was most
frequent in the type 4 group (p <
0.001). The mean subsidence
of the stem was 2.3 mm ( The impacted bone grafting technique has good clinical results
in femoral revision. However, major bone defects affect clinical
outcome and also result in more operative complications.
We retrospectively reviewed 175 patients (191 hips) who had undergone primary cemented total hip replacement between November 1992 and November 1995 using a collarless polished double-tapered femoral component after a minimum of ten years (mean 11.08; 10 to 12.8). All stems were implanted using contemporary cementing techniques with a distal cement restrictor, pressurised lavage, retrograde cementing with a gun and proximal pressurisation. Clinical outcome was assessed using the Harris Hip score. Radiological analysis was performed on calibrated plain radiographs taken in two planes. Complete radiological data on 110 patients (120 hips) and clinical follow-up on all the surviving 111 patients (122 hips) was available. The fate of all the hips was known. At final follow-up, the mean Harris Hip score was 86 (47 to 100), and 87 of 116 patients (75%) had good or excellent scores. Survival with revision of the stem for aseptic loosening as the endpoint was 100%; and survival with revision of the stem for any reason was 95.9% (95% confidence interval 87.8 to 96.8) at ten years. All the stems subsided vertically at the stem-cement interface in a predictable pattern, at an overall mean rate of 0.18 mm per year (0.02 to 2.16), but with a mean rate of 0.80 mm (0.02 to 2.5) during the first year. The mean total subsidence was 1.95 mm (0.21 to 24). Only three stems loosened at the cement-bone interface. There was excellent preservation of proximal femoral bone stock. There was a high incidence of Brooker III and IV heterotopic ossification affecting 25 patients (22%). The collarless polished tapered stem has an excellent clinical and radiological outcome at a minimum of ten years’ follow-up. The pattern and magnitude of subsidence of the stem within the cement mantle occurred in a predictable pattern, consistent with the design philosophy.
Joint replacement of the hip and knee remain
very satisfactory operations. They are, however, expensive. The
actual manufacturing of the implant represents only 30% of the final
cost, while sales and marketing represent 40%. Recently, the patents
on many well established and successful implants have expired. Companies
have started producing and distributing implants that purport to
replicate existing implants with good long-term results. The aims of this paper are to assess the legality, the monitoring
and cost saving implications of such generic implants. We also assess
how this might affect the traditional orthopaedic implant companies. Cite this article:
Hip hemiarthroplasty is a standard treatment for intracapsular
proximal femoral fractures in the frail elderly. In this study we
have explored the implications of early return to theatre, within
30 days, on patient outcome following hip hemiarthroplasty. We retrospectively reviewed the hospital records of all hip hemiarthroplasties
performed in our unit between January 2010 and January 2015. Demographic
details, medical backround, details of the primary procedure, complications,
subsequent procedures requiring return to theatre, re-admissions,
discharge destination and death were collected.Aims
Patients and Methods
The purpose of this prospective study was to
evaluate the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of revision of
the femoral component of a total hip replacement using impaction
bone grafting. Femoral revision with an impacted allograft was performed
on 29 patients (31 hips). In all, 21 hips (68%) had grade III or
IV femoral defects according to the Endo-Klinik classification.
A total of 11 patients (12 hips) died before the ten-year follow-up
period. Of the remaining patients, 18 patients (19 hips) were followed
for 10 to 15 years; three further patients died during this time.
None of the 31 stems underwent further revision of their stem. However,
four stems showed extensive subsidence (>
15 mm). One of these patients
had a femoral fracture that required fixation. Three other patients
had a femoral fracture, two of which required fixation and the other
was treated conservatively. Patients with a femoral fracture and/or
severe subsidence had significantly more grade IV defects (six of
seven hips; p = 0.004). One patient needed a closed reduction for
dislocation. Impaction allografting in revision hip surgery gives good long-term
results for femora with grades I, II and III Endo-Klinik-classified
defects. Extensive subsidence and femoral fractures were seen mainly
in patients with grade IV damaged femora.
We performed a clinical and radiological study to determine the rate of failure of the Charnley Elite-Plus femoral component. Our aim was to confirm or refute the predictions of a previous roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis study in which 20% of the Charnley Elite-Plus stems had shown rapid posterior head migration. It was predicted that this device would have a high early rate of failure. We examined 118 patients at a mean of nine years after hip replacement, including the 19 patients from the original roentgen stereophotogrammetric study. The number of revision procedures was recorded and clinical and radiological examinations were performed. The rate of survival of the femoral stems at ten years was 83% when revision alone was considered to be a failure. It decreased to 59% when a radiologically loose stem was also considered to be a failure. All the patients previously shown in the roentgen stereophotogrammetric study to have high posterior head migration went on to failure. There was a highly significant difference (p = 0.002) in posterior head migration measured at two years after operation between failed and non-failed femoral stems, but there was no significant difference in subsidence between these two groups. Our study has shown that the Charnley Elite-Plus femoral component has an unacceptably high rate of failure. It confirms that early evaluation of new components is important and that roentgen stereophotogrammetric is a good tool for this. Our findings have also shown that rapid posterior head migration is predictive of premature loosening and a better predictor than subsidence.
Advocates of debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR)
in hip periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) argue that a procedure
not disturbing a sound prosthesis-bone interface is likely to lead
to better survival and functional outcome compared with revision.
This case-control study aims were to compare outcome of DAIRs for
infected primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) with outcomes following
primary THA and two-stage revision of infected primary THAs. We retrospectively reviewed all DAIRs, performed for confirmed
infected primary hip arthropasty (n = 82) at out institution, between
1997 and 2013. Data recorded included full patient information and
type of surgery. Outcome measures included complications, mortality,
implant survivorship and functional outcome. Outcome was compared with
two control groups matched for gender and age; a cohort of primary
THAs (n = 120) and a cohort of two-stage revisions for infection
(n = 66).Aims
Patients and Methods
We used roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis to follow 33 C-stem femoral components for two years after primary total hip arthroplasty. All components migrated distally and posteriorly within the cement mantle. The mean distal migration was 1.35 mm (
We describe two cases of fracture of Corin Taper-Fit stems used for cement-in-cement revision of congenital dysplasia of the hip. Both prostheses were implanted in patients in their 50s, with high offsets (+7.5 mm and +3.5 mm), one with a large diameter (48 mm) head and one with a constrained acetabular component. Fracture of the stems took place at nine months and three years post-operatively following low-demand activity. Both fractures occurred at the most medial of the two stem introducer holes in the neck of the prosthesis, a design feature that is unique to the Taper-Fit stem. We would urge caution in the use of these particular stems for cement-in-cement revisions.