The December 2014 Knee Roundup360 looks at: national guidance on arthroplasty thromboprophylaxis is effective; unicompartmental knee replacement has the edge in terms of short-term complications; stiff knees, timing and manipulation; neuropathic pain and total knee replacement; synovial fluid α-defensin and CRP: a new gold standard in joint infection diagnosis?; how to assess anterior knee pain?; where is the evidence? Five new implants under the spotlight; and a fresh look at ACL reconstruction
While medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is indicated
for patients with full-thickness cartilage loss, it is occasionally
used to treat those with partial-thickness loss. The aim of this
study was to investigate the five-year outcomes in a consecutive
series of UKAs used in patients with partial thickness cartilage
loss in the medial compartment of the knee. Between 2002 and 2014, 94 consecutive UKAs were undertaken in
90 patients with partial thickness cartilage loss and followed up
independently for a mean of six years (1 to 13). These patients
had partial thickness cartilage loss either on both femur and tibia
(13 knees), or on either the femur or the tibia, with full thickness
loss on the other surface of the joint (18 and 63 knees respectively).
Using propensity score analysis, these patients were matched 1:2 based
on age, gender and pre-operative Oxford Knee Score (OKS) with knees
with full thickness loss on both the femur and tibia. The functional
outcomes, implant survival and incidence of re-operations were assessed
at one, two and five years post-operatively. A subgroup of 36 knees
in 36 patients with partial thickness cartilage loss, who had pre-operative
MRI scans, was assessed to identify whether there were any factors
identified on MRI that predicted the outcome.Aims
Patients and Methods
The August 2014 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: Anaesthesic modality does not affect outcomes in tumour surgery; infection predictors in orthopaedic oncology; sarcoma depth unimportant in survival; photon/proton radiotherapy surprisingly effective in chondrosarcoma control; total humerus replacement a success!; LDH simple predictor of survival in sarcoma; Denosumab again! and Oops procedures in triplicate.
The October 2014 Trauma Roundup360 looks at: proximal humeral fractures in children; quadrilateral surface plates in transverse acetabular fractures; sleep deprivation and poor outcomes in trauma; bipolar hemiarthroplasty; skeletal traction; forefoot fractures; telemedicine in trauma; ketamine infusion for orthopaedic injuries; and improved functional outcomes seen with trauma networks.
We performed a case–control study to compare
the rates of further surgery, revision and complications, operating time
and survival in patients who were treated with either an uncemented
hydroxyapatite-coated Corail bipolar femoral stem or a cemented
Exeter stem for a displaced intracapsular fracture of the hip. The
mean age of the patients in the uncemented group was 82.5 years
(53 to 97) and in the cemented group was 82.7 years (51 to 99) We used
propensity score matching, adjusting for age, gender and the presence
or absence of dementia and comorbidities, to produce a matched cohort
receiving an Exeter stem (n = 69) with which to compare the outcome of
patients receiving a Corail stem (n = 69). The Corail had a significantly
lower all-cause rate of further surgery (p = 0.016; odds ratio (OR)
0.18, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.84) and number of hips undergoing major further
surgery (p = 0.029; OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.09). The mean operating
time was significantly less for the Corail group than for the cemented Exeter
group (59 min [12 to 136] Cite this article:
