Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 81 - 100 of 217
Results per page:
Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 10, Issue 2 | Pages 37 - 40
1 Apr 2021


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 9, Issue 4 | Pages 17 - 20
1 Aug 2020


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 6 | Pages 26 - 29
1 Dec 2019


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 5 | Pages 606 - 610
1 May 2020
Nicholson JA Slader B Martindale A Mckie S Robinson CM

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of distension arthrography in the treatment of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. The secondary aim was to assess which patient and procedural factors predicted the recurrence of symptoms after the procedure.

Methods

All patients referred to our shoulder clinic over a ten-year period, between 2008 and 2018, with a clinical diagnosis of capsulitis and symptoms persisting for more than six months, were offered treatment with a distension arthrogram. All procedures were performed by one of five musculoskeletal radiologists, with a combination of steroid, local anaesthetic, and a distention volume of 10 ml, 30 ml, or 50 ml. Patient demographics, procedural details, recurrence of symptoms, and the need for further intervention were evaluated.


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 2, Issue 1 | Pages 58 - 65
22 Jan 2021
Karssiens TJ Gill JR Sunil Kumar KH Sjolin SU

Aims

The Mathys Affinis Short is the most frequently used stemless total shoulder prosthesis in the UK. The purpose of this prospective cohort study is to report the survivorship, clinical, and radiological outcomes of the first independent series of the Affinis Short prosthesis.

Methods

From January 2011 to January 2019, a total of 141 Affinis Short prostheses were implanted in 127 patients by a single surgeon. Mean age at time of surgery was 68 (44 to 89). Minimum one year and maximum eight year follow-up (mean 3.7 years) was analyzed using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) at latest follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed with implant revision as the endpoint. Most recently performed radiographs were reviewed for component radiolucent lines (RLLs) and proximal humeral migration.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 9, Issue 6 | Pages 31 - 33
1 Dec 2020


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 4 | Pages 29 - 32
1 Aug 2019


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 9, Issue 6 | Pages 27 - 30
1 Dec 2020


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 5 | Pages 21 - 24
1 Oct 2019


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1542 - 1548
2 Nov 2020
Stirling PHC Oliver WM Ling Tan H Brown IDM Oliver CW McQueen MM Molyneux SG Duckworth AD

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to describe patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following corrective osteotomy for a symptomatic malunion of the distal radius.

Methods

We retrospectively identified 122 adult patients from a single centre over an eight-year period who had undergone corrective osteotomy for a symptomatic malunion of the distal radius. The primary long-term outcome was the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score. Secondary outcomes included the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score, the EQ-5D-5L score, complications, and the Net Promoter Score (NPS). Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with the PRWE score.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 9, Issue 9 | Pages 613 - 622
1 Sep 2020
Perucca Orfei C Lovati AB Lugano G Viganò M Bottagisio M D’Arrigo D Sansone V Setti S de Girolamo L

Aims

In the context of tendon degenerative disorders, the need for innovative conservative treatments that can improve the intrinsic healing potential of tendon tissue is progressively increasing. In this study, the role of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) in improving the tendon healing process was evaluated in a rat model of collagenase-induced Achilles tendinopathy.

Methods

A total of 68 Sprague Dawley rats received a single injection of type I collagenase in Achilles tendons to induce the tendinopathy and then were daily exposed to PEMFs (1.5 mT and 75 Hz) for up to 14 days - starting 1, 7, or 15 days after the injection - to identify the best treatment option with respect to the phase of the disease. Then, 7 and 14 days of PEMF exposure were compared to identify the most effective protocol.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 9, Issue 3 | Pages 44 - 45
1 Jun 2020
Das MA


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 9, Issue 4 | Pages 23 - 26
1 Aug 2020


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 9, Issue 4 | Pages 30 - 33
1 Aug 2020


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 9, Issue 4 | Pages 26 - 30
1 Aug 2020


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 1, Issue 6 | Pages 281 - 286
19 Jun 2020
Zahra W Karia M Rolton D

Aims

The aim of this paper is to describe the impact of COVID-19 on spine surgery services in a district general hospital in England in order to understand the spinal service provisions that may be required during a pandemic.

Methods

A prospective cohort study was undertaken between 17 March 2020 and 30 April 2020 and compared with retrospective data from same time period in 2019. We compared the number of patients requiring acute hospital admission or orthopaedic referrals and indications of referrals from our admission sheets and obtained operative data from our theatre software.


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 1, Issue 6 | Pages 222 - 228
9 Jun 2020
Liow MHL Tay KXK Yeo NEM Tay DKJ Goh SK Koh JSB Howe TS Tan AHC

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems worldwide. Orthopaedic departments have adopted business continuity models and guidelines for essential and non-essential surgeries to preserve hospital resources as well as protect patients and staff. These guidelines broadly encompass reduction of ambulatory care with a move towards telemedicine, redeployment of orthopaedic surgeons/residents to the frontline battle against COVID-19, continuation of education and research through web-based means, and cancellation of non-essential elective procedures. However, if containment of COVID-19 community spread is achieved, resumption of elective orthopaedic procedures and transition plans to return to normalcy must be considered for orthopaedic departments. The COVID-19 pandemic also presents a moral dilemma to the orthopaedic surgeon considering elective procedures. What is the best treatment for our patients and how does the fear of COVID-19 influence the risk-benefit discussion during a pandemic? Surgeons must deliberate the fine balance between elective surgery for a patient’s wellbeing versus risks to the operating team and utilization of precious hospital resources. Attrition of healthcare workers or Orthopaedic surgeons from restarting elective procedures prematurely or in an unsafe manner may render us ill-equipped to handle the second wave of infections. This highlights the need to develop effective screening protocols or preoperative COVID-19 testing before elective procedures in high-risk, elderly individuals with comorbidities. Alternatively, high-risk individuals should be postponed until the risk of nosocomial COVID-19 infection is minimal. In addition, given the higher mortality and perioperative morbidity of patients with COVID-19 undergoing surgery, the decision to operate must be carefully deliberated. As we ramp-up elective services and get “back to business” as orthopaedic surgeons, we have to be constantly mindful to proceed in a cautious and calibrated fashion, delivering the best care, while maintaining utmost vigilance to prevent the resurgence of COVID-19 during this critical transition period.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:222–228.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 1 | Pages 21 - 24
1 Feb 2019


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 9, Issue 2 | Pages 30 - 33
1 Apr 2020


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 3 | Pages 11 - 13
1 Jun 2019