A small proportion of patients have persistent
pain after total knee replacement (TKR). The primary aim of this study
was to record the prevalence of pain after TKR at specific intervals
post-operatively and to ascertain the impact of neuropathic pain.
The secondary aim was to establish any predictive factors that could
be used to identify patients who were likely to have high levels
of pain or neuropathic pain after TKR. A total of 96 patients were included in the study. Their mean
age was 71 years (48 to 89); 54 (56%) were female. The mean follow-up
was 46 months (39 to 51). Pre-operative demographic details were
recorded including a Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain, the Hospital
Anxiety and Depression score as well as the painDETECT score for neuropathic
pain. Functional outcome was assessed using the Oxford Knee score. The mean pre-operative VAS was 5.8 (1 to 10); and it improved
significantly at all time periods post-operatively (p <
0.001):
(from 4.5 at day three to five (1 to 10), 3.2 at six weeks (0 to
9), 2.4 at three months (0 to 7), 2.0 at six months (0 to 9), 1.7
at nine months (0 to 9), 1.5 at one year (0 to 8) and 2.0 at mean
46 months (0 to 10)). There was a high correlation (r >
0.7; p <
0.001) between the mean VAS scores for pain and the mean painDETECT
scores at three months, one year and three years post-operatively.
There was no correlation between the pre-operative scores and any
post-operative scores at any time point. We report the prevalence of pain and neuropathic pain at various
intervals up to three years after TKR. Neuropathic pain is an underestimated
problem in patients with pain after TKR. It peaks at between six
weeks and three-months post-operatively. However, from these data
we were unable to predict which patients are most likely to be affected. Cite this article:
This single-blinded randomised controlled trial
investigated whether one design of mobile-bearing (MB) total knee replacement
(TKR) has any advantage over a fixed-bearing (FB) design on long-term
fixation as measured by radiostereometry. The amount of wear underneath
the mobile bearing was also evaluated. A series of 42 knees was randomised
to MB or FB tibial components with appropriate polyethylene inserts
and followed for between ten and 12 years, or until the death of
the patient. The polyethylene in the MB group was superior in that
it was gamma-irradiated in inert gas and was calcium-stearate free;
the polyethylene in the FB group was gamma-irradiated in air and
contained calcium stearate. In theory this should be advantageous
to the wear rate of the MB group. At final follow-up the overall
mean migration was 0.75 mm ( For the MB group, the mean linear wear rate on the under-surface
was 0.026 mm/year (
Structural allografts may be used to manage uncontained
bone defects in revision total knee replacement (TKR). However,
the availability of cadaver grafts is limited in some areas of Asia.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid-term outcome of the
use of femoral head allografts for the reconstruction of uncontained
defects in revision TKR, focusing on complications related to the
graft. We retrospectively reviewed 28 patients (30 TKRs) with Anderson
Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) type 3 bone defects, who underwent
revision using femoral head allografts and stemmed components. The
mean number of femoral heads used was 1.7 (1 to 3). The allograft–host
junctions were packed with cancellous autograft. At a mean follow-up of 76 months (38 to 136) the mean American
Knee Society knee score improved from 37.2 (17 to 60) pre-operatively
to 90 (83 to 100) (p <
0.001). The mean function score improved
from 26.5 (0 to 50) pre-operatively to 81 (60 to 100) (p <
0.001).
All the grafts healed to the host bone. The mean time to healing
of the graft was 6.6 months
(4 to 16). There have been no complications of collapse of the graft,
nonunion, infection or implant loosening. No revision surgery was
required. The use of femoral head allografts in conjunction with a stemmed
component and autogenous bone graft in revision TKR in patients
with uncontained bone defects resulted in a high rate of healing
of the graft with minimal complications and a satisfactory outcome.
Longer follow-up is needed to observe the evolution of the graft. Cite this article:
There are several methods for evaluating stability
of the joint during total knee replacement (TKR). Activities of daily
living demand mechanical loading to the knee joint, not only in
full extension, but also in mid-flexion. The purpose of this study
was to compare the varus-valgus stability throughout flexion in
knees treated with either cruciate-retaining or posterior-stabilised
TKR, using an intra-operative navigation technique. A total of 34
knees underwent TKR with computer navigation, during which the investigator
applied a maximum varus-valgus stress to the knee while steadily
moving the leg from full extension to flexion both before and after
prosthetic implantation. The femorotibial angle was measured simultaneously
by the navigation system at every 10° throughout the range of movement.
It was found that posterior-stabilised knees had more varus-valgus
laxity than cruciate-retaining knees at all angles examined, and
the differences were statistically significant at 10° (p = 0.0093),
20° (p = 0.0098) and 30° of flexion (p = 0.0252). Cite this article:
This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine
the mid- to long-term clinical outcomes for a medial-pivot total
knee replacement (TKR) system. The objectives were to synthesise
available survivorship, Knee Society Scores (KSS), and reasons for
revision for this system. A systematic search was conducted of two online databases to
identify sources of survivorship, KSS, and reasons for revision.
Survivorship results were compared with values in the National Joint
Registry of England, Wales, and Northern Ireland (NJR).Objectives
Methods
The June 2014 Wrist &
Hand Roundup360 looks at: aart throwing not quite as we thought; two-gear, four-bar linkage in the wrist?; assessing outcomes in distal radial fractures; gold standard Swanson’s?; multistrand repairs of unclear benefit in flexor tendon release; for goodness’ sake, leave the thumb alone in scaphoid fractures; horizons in carpal tunnel surgery; treading the Essex-Lopresti tightrope; wrist replacement in trauma? and radial shortening reliable in the long term for Kienbock’s disease
Between 2005 and 2010 ten consecutive children
with high-energy open diaphyseal tibial fractures were treated by early
reduction and application of a programmable circular external fixator.
They were all male with a mean age of 11.5 years (5.2 to 15.4),
and they were followed for a mean of 34.5 months (6 to 77). Full
weight-bearing was allowed immediately post-operatively. The mean
time from application to removal of the frame was 16 weeks (12 to
21). The mean deformity following removal of the frame was 0.15°
(0° to 1.5°) of coronal angulation, 0.2° (0° to 2°) sagittal angulation,
1.1 mm (0 to 10) coronal translation, and 0.5 mm (0 to 2) sagittal
translation. All patients achieved consolidated bony union and satisfactory
wound healing. There were no cases of delayed or nonunion, compartment
syndrome or neurovascular injury. Four patients had a mild superficial
pin site infection; all settled with a single course of oral antibiotics.
No patient had a deep infection or re-fracture following removal
of the frame. The time to union was comparable with, or better than,
other published methods of stabilisation for these injuries. The
stable fixator configuration not only facilitates management of
the accompanying soft-tissue injury but enables anatomical post-injury
alignment, which is important in view of the limited remodelling
potential of the tibia in children aged >
ten years. Where appropriate
expertise exists, we recommend this technique for the management
of high-energy open tibial fractures in children.
This review considers the surgical treatment
of displaced fractures involving the knee in elderly, osteoporotic patients.
The goals of treatment include pain control, early mobilisation,
avoidance of complications and minimising the need for further surgery.
Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) frequently results in
loss of reduction, which can result in post-traumatic arthritis
and the occasional conversion to total knee replacement (TKR). TKR
after failed internal fixation is challenging, with modest functional
outcomes and high complication rates. TKR undertaken as treatment
of the initial fracture has better results to late TKR, but does
not match the outcome of primary TKR without complications. Given
the relatively infrequent need for late TKR following failed fixation,
ORIF is the preferred management for most cases. Early TKR can be
considered for those patients with pre-existing arthritis, bicondylar
femoral fractures, those who would be unable to comply with weight-bearing restrictions,
or where a single definitive procedure is required.
There is great variability in acetabular component
orientation following hip replacement. The aims of this study were
to compare the component orientation at impaction with the orientation
measured on post-operative radiographs and identify factors that
influence the difference between the two. A total of 67 hip replacements
(52 total hip replacements and 15 hip resurfacings) were prospectively
studied. Intra-operatively, the orientation of the acetabular component
after impaction relative to the operating table was measured using
a validated stereo-photogrammetry protocol. Post-operatively, the
radiographic orientation was measured; the mean inclination/anteversion
was 43° ( This study demonstrated that in order to achieve a specific radiographic
orientation target, surgeons should implant the acetabular component
5° less inclined and 8° more anteverted than their target. Great
variability (2 Cite this article:
The April 2012 Knee Roundup360 looks at the torn ACL, ACL reconstruction, the risk of ACL rupture, the benefit of warm-ups before exercise, glucosamine and tibiofemoral osteoarthritis, sensitisation and sporting tendinopathy, pain relief after TKR, the long-term results of the Genesis I, the gender specific recovery times after TKR, and the accuracy of the orthopaedic eyeball
The June 2014 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup360 looks at: plaster wedging in paediatric forearm fractures; the medial approach for DDH; Ponseti – but not as he knew it?; Salter osteotomy more accurate than Pemberton in DDH; is the open paediatric fracture an emergency?; bang up-to-date with femoral external fixation; indomethacin, heterotopic ossification and cerebral palsy hips; lengthening nails for congenital femoral deformities, and is MRI the answer to imaging of the physis?
The ideal form of fixation for displaced, extra-articular
fractures of the distal tibia remains controversial. In the UK, open
reduction and internal fixation with locking-plates and intramedullary
nailing are the two most common forms of treatment. Both techniques
provide reliable fixation but both are associated with specific
complications. There is little information regarding the functional
recovery following either procedure. We performed a randomised pilot trial to determine the functional
outcome of 24 adult patients treated with either a locking-plate
(n = 12) or an intramedullary nailing (n = 12). At six months, there
was an adjusted difference of 13 points in the Disability Rating
Index in favour of the intramedullary nail. However, this was not
statistically significant in this pilot trial (p = 0.498). A total
of seven patients required further surgery in the locking-plate
group and one in the intramedullary nail group. This study suggests that there may be clinically relevant, functional
differences in patients treated with nail
Elastic stable intramedullary nailing (ESIN)
is generally acknowledged to be the treatment of choice for displaced diaphyseal
femoral fractures in children over the age of three years, although
complication rates of up to 50% are described. Pre-bending the nails
is recommended, but there are no published data to support this.
Using synthetic bones and a standardised simulated fracture, we
performed biomechanical testing to determine the influence on the
stability of the fracture of pre-bending the nails before implantation.
Standard ESIN was performed on 24 synthetic femoral models with
a spiral fracture. In eight cases the nails were inserted without
any pre-bending, in a further eight cases they were pre-bent to
30° and in the last group of eight cases they were pre-bent to 60°. Mechanical
testing revealed that pre-bending to 60° produced a significant
increase in the stiffness or stability of the fracture. Pre-bending
to 60° showed a significant positive influence on the stiffness
compared with unbent nails. Pre-bending to 30° improved stiffness
only slightly. These findings validate the recommendations for pre-bending,
but the degree of pre-bend should exceed 30°. Adopting higher degrees
of pre-bending should improve stability in spiral fractures and
reduce the complications of varus deformity and shortening.
We undertook a randomised controlled trial to
compare the piriformis-sparing approach with the standard posterior approach
used for total hip replacement (THR). We recruited 100 patients
awaiting THR and randomly allocated them to either the piriformis-sparing
approach or the standard posterior approach. Pre- and post-operative
care programmes and rehabilitation regimes were identical for both
groups. Observers were blinded to the allocation throughout; patients
were blinded until the two-week assessment. Follow-up was at six
weeks, three months, one year and two years. In all 11 patients
died or were lost to follow-up. There was no significant difference between groups for any of
the functional outcomes. However, for patients in the piriformis-sparing
group there was a trend towards a better six-minute walk test at
two weeks and greater patient satisfaction at six weeks. The acetabular
components were less anteverted (p = 0.005) and had a lower mean
inclination angle (p = 0.02) in the piriformis-sparing group. However,
in both groups the mean component positions were within Lewinnek’s
safe zone. Surgeons perceived the piriformis-sparing approach to
be significantly more difficult than the standard approach (p =
0.03), particularly in obese patients. In conclusion, performing THR through a shorter incision involving
sparing piriformis is more difficult and only provides short-term
benefits compared with the standard posterior approach.
The Bologna–Oxford (BOX) total ankle replacement
(TAR) was developed with the aim of achieving satisfactory pain-free
movement of the ankle. To date, only one single multicentre study
has reported its clinical results. The aim of this study was to
conduct an independent review of its mid-term results. We retrospectively reviewed a total of 60 prospectively followed
patients in whom 62 BOX TARs had been implanted between 2004 and
2008. We used the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS)
score to assess the clinical results. Standardised radiographs taken
at the time of final follow-up were analysed by two observers. The
overall survival was 91.9% at a mean follow-up of 42.5 months (24
to 71). The mean AOFAS score had improved from 35.1 points (
Short uncemented humeral stems can preserve humeral
bone stock and facilitate revision surgery but may be prone to malalignment
or loosening, especially when used in reverse total shoulder replacement
(TSR). We undertook a retrospective review of 44 patients with a
mean age of 76 years (59 to 92) who underwent primary reverse TSR
with a short uncemented humeral stem. There were 29 females. The
indications for joint replacement included cuff tear associated
arthropathy (33), avascular necrosis (six), post-traumatic arthritis
(two), and inflammatory arthritis (three). At a mean follow-up of
27 months (24 to 40), pain was rated as mild or none in 43 shoulders
(97.7%). The mean active elevation improved from 54° Cite this article:
We present the ten- to 15-year follow-up of 31
patients (34 knees), who underwent an Elmslie-Trillat tibial tubercle osteotomy
for chronic, severe patellar instability, unresponsive to non-operative
treatment. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was
31 years (18 to 46) and they were reviewed post-operatively, at
four years (2 to 8) and then at 12 years (10 to 15). All patients
had pre-operative knee radiographs and Cox and Insall knee scores. Superolateral
portal arthroscopy was performed per-operatively to document chondral
damage and after the osteotomy to assess the stability of the patellofemoral
joint. A total of 28 knees (82%) had a varying degree of damage
to the articular surface. At final follow-up 25 patients (28 knees)
were available for review and underwent clinical examination, radiographs
of the knee, and Cox and Insall scoring. Six patients who had no
arthroscopic chondral abnormality showed no or only early signs
of osteoarthritis on final radiographs; while 12 patients with lower
grade chondral damage (grade 1 to 2) showed early to moderate signs
of osteoarthritis and six out of ten knees with higher grade chondral
damage (grade 3 to 4) showed marked evidence of osteoarthritis;
four of these had undergone a knee replacement. In the 22 patients
(24 knees) with complete follow-up, 19 knees (79.2%) were reported
to have a good or excellent outcome at four years, while 15 knees
(62.5%) were reported to have the same at long-term follow-up. The
functional and radiological results show that the extent of pre-operatively
sustained chondral damage is directly related to the subsequent
development of patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Cite this article: