Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a major orthopaedic
intervention. The length of a patient's stay has been progressively
reduced with the introduction of enhanced recovery protocols: day-case
surgery has become the ultimate challenge. This narrative review shows the potential limitations of day-case
TKA. These constraints may be social, linked to patient’s comorbidities,
or due to surgery-related adverse events (e.g. pain, post-operative
nausea and vomiting, etc.). Using patient stratification, tailored surgical techniques and
multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, day-case TKA might be achievable
in a limited group of patients. The younger, male patient without
comorbidities and with an excellent social network around him might
be a candidate. Demographic changes, effective recovery programmes and less invasive
surgical techniques such as unicondylar knee arthroplasty, may increase
the size of the group of potential day-case patients. The cost reduction achieved by day-case TKA needs to be balanced
against any increase in morbidity and mortality and the cost of
advanced follow-up at a distance with new technology. These factors
need to be evaluated before adopting this ultimate ‘fast-track’
approach. Cite this article:
The demand for spinal surgery and its costs have
both risen over the past decade. In 2008 the aggregate hospital
bill for surgical care of all spinal procedures was reported to
be $33.9 billion. One key driver of rising costs is spinal implants.
In 2011 our institution implemented a cost containment programme
for spinal implants which was designed to reduce the prices of individual
spinal implants and to reduce the inter-surgeon variation in implant costs.
Between February 2012 and January 2013, our spinal surgeons performed
1493 spinal procedures using implants from eight different vendors.
By applying market analysis and implant cost data from the previous
year, we established references prices for each individual type
of spinal implant, regardless of vendor, who were required to meet
these unit prices. We found that despite the complexity of spinal
surgery and the initial reluctance of vendors to reduce prices,
significant savings were made to the medical centre. Cite this article: 2015; 97-B:1102–5.
Orthopaedic surgery is in an exciting transitional period as modern surgical interventions, implants and scientific developments are providing new therapeutic options. As advances in basic science and technology improve our understanding of the pathology and repair of musculoskeletal tissue, traditional operations may be replaced by newer, less invasive procedures which are more appropriately targeted at the underlying pathophysiology. However, evidence-based practice will remain a basic requirement of care. Orthopaedic surgeons can and should remain at the forefront of the development of novel therapeutic interventions and their application. Progression of the potential of bench research into an improved array of orthopaedic treatments in an effective yet safe manner will require the development of a subgroup of specialists with extended training in research to play an important role in bridging the gap between laboratory science and clinical practice. International regulations regarding the introduction of new biological treatments will place an additional burden on the mechanisms of this translational process, and orthopaedic surgeons who are trained in science, surgery and the regulatory environment will be essential. Training and supporting individuals with these skills requires special consideration and discussion by the orthopaedic community. In this paper we review some traditional approaches to the integration of orthopaedic science and surgery, the therapeutic potential of current regenerative biomedical science for cartilage repair and ways in which we may develop surgeons with the skills required to translate scientific discovery into effective and properly assessed orthopaedic treatments.
We have investigated iatrogenic popliteal artery
injuries (PAI) during non arthroplasty knee surgery regarding mechanism
of injury, treatment and outcomes, and to identify successful strategies
when injury occurs. In all, 21 iatrogenic popliteal artery injuries in 21 patients
during knee surgery other than knee arthroplasty were identified
from the Swedish Vascular Registry (Swedvasc) between 1987 and 2011.
Prospective registry data were supplemented with case-records, including
long-term follow-up. In total, 13 patients suffered PAI during elective surgery
and eight during urgent surgery such as fracture fixation or tumour
resection. Nine injuries were detected intra-operatively, five within
12 to 48 hours and seven >
48 hours post-operatively (two days to
23 years). There were 19 open vascular and two endovascular surgical repairs.
Two patients died within six months of surgery. One patient required
amputation. Only six patients had a complete recovery of whom had
the vascular injury detected at time of injury and repaired by a
vascular surgeon. Patients sustaining vascular injury during elective
procedures are more likely to litigate (p = 0.029). We conclude that outcomes are poorer when there is a delay of
diagnosis and treatment, and that orthopaedic surgeons should develop
strategies to detect PAI early and ensure rapid access to vascular
surgical support. Cite this article:
Minimal clinically important differences (MCID)
in the scores of patient-reported outcome measures allow clinicians to
assess the outcome of intervention from the perspective of the patient.
There has been significant variation in their absolute values in
previous publications and a lack of consistency in their calculation. The purpose of this study was first, to establish whether these
values, following spinal surgery, vary depending on the surgical
intervention and their method of calculation and secondly, to assess
whether there is any correlation between the two external anchors
most frequently used to calculate the MCID. We carried out a retrospective analysis of prospectively gathered
data of adult patients who underwent elective spinal surgery between
1994 and 2009. A total of 244 patients were included. There were
125 men and 119 women with a mean age of 54 years (16 to 84); the
mean follow-up was 62 months (6 to 199) The MCID was calculated
using three previously published methods. Our results show that the value of the MCID varies considerably
with the operation and its method of calculation. There was good
correlation between the two external anchors. The global outcome
tool correlated significantly better. We conclude that consensus needs to be reached on the best method
of calculating the MCID. This then needs to be defined for each
spinal procedure. Using a blanket value for the MCID for all spinal
procedures should be avoided. Cite this article:
The contemporary practice of orthopaedic surgery
requires an evidence-based approach to support all medical and surgical
interventions. In this essay, the author expresses a forthright,
personal and somewhat prejudiced appeal to retain the legitimacy
of clinical decision making in conditions that are rare, contain
multiple variables, have a solution that generally works or has
an unpredictable course. Cite this article:
Accurate, reproducible outcome measures are essential
for the evaluation of any orthopaedic procedure, in both clinical
practice and research. Commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have
drawbacks such as ‘floor’ and ‘ceiling’ effects, limitations of
worldwide adaptability and an inability to distinguish pain from
function. They are also unable to measure the true outcome of an
intervention rather than a patient’s perception of that outcome. Performance-based functional outcome tools may address these
problems. It is important that both clinicians and researchers are
aware of these measures when dealing with high-demand patients,
using a new intervention or implant, or testing a new rehabilitation
protocol. This article provides an overview of some of the clinically-validated
performance-based functional outcome tools used in the assessment
of patients undergoing hip and knee surgery. Cite this article:
To assess the sustainability of our institutional
bone bank, we calculated the final product cost of fresh-frozen femoral
head allografts and compared these costs with the use of commercial
alternatives. Between 2007 and 2010 all quantifiable costs associated
with allograft donor screening, harvesting, storage, and administration
of femoral head allografts retrieved from patients undergoing elective
hip replacement were analysed. From 290 femoral head allografts harvested and stored as full
(complete) head specimens or as two halves, 101 had to be withdrawn.
In total, 104 full and 75 half heads were implanted in 152 recipients.
The calculated final product costs were €1367 per full head. Compared
with the use of commercially available processed allografts, a saving
of at least €43 119 was realised over four-years (€10 780 per year)
resulting in a cost-effective intervention at our institution. Assuming
a price of between €1672 and €2149 per commercially purchased allograft,
breakeven analysis revealed that implanting between 34 and 63 allografts
per year equated to the total cost of bone banking. Cite this article:
The use of robots in orthopaedic surgery is an
emerging field that is gaining momentum. It has the potential for significant
improvements in surgical planning, accuracy of component implantation
and patient safety. Advocates of robot-assisted systems describe
better patient outcomes through improved pre-operative planning
and enhanced execution of surgery. However, costs, limited availability,
a lack of evidence regarding the efficiency and safety of such systems
and an absence of long-term high-impact studies have restricted
the widespread implementation of these systems. We have reviewed
the literature on the efficacy, safety and current understanding of
the use of robotics in orthopaedics. Cite this article:
The June 2014 Foot &
Ankle Roundup360 looks at: peroneal tendon tears associated with calcaneal fractures; syndesmosis procedure for first ray deformities; thromboprophylaxis not necessary in elective Ilizarov surgery; ankle replacement gaining traction in academic centres; some evidence for PRP and; fusion nailing and osteotomy an effective treatment for symptomatic tibial malunion
There are significant differences in the methods and styles of orthopaedic surgical training between continents, all with the aim to produce competent consultant surgeons, but the differences in training content and pathway are vast. We review and contrast the key differences between three continents.
Several aspects of the management of an orthopaedic surgical patient are not directly related to the surgical technique but are nevertheless essential for a successful outcome. Blood management is one of these. This paper considers the various strategies available for the management of blood loss in patients undergoing orthopaedic and trauma surgery.
The April 2014 Research Roundup360 looks at: scientific writing needed in orthopaedic papers; antiseptics and osteoblasts; thromboembolic management in orthopaedic patients; nicotine and obesity in post-operative complications; defining the “Patient Acceptable Symptom State”; and cheap and nasty implants of poor quality.
We have compared the outcome of hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder in three distinct diagnostic groups, using survival analysis as used by the United Kingdom national joint registers, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as recommended by Darzi in the 2008 NHS review, and transition and satisfaction questions. A total of 72 hemiarthroplasties, 19 for primary osteoarthritis (OA) with an intact rotator cuff, 22 for OA with a torn rotator cuff, and 31 for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), were followed up for between three and eight years. All the patients survived, with no revisions or dislocations and no significant radiological evidence of loosening. The mean new Oxford shoulder score (minimum/worst 0, maximum/best 48) improved significantly for all groups (p <
0.001), in the OA group with an intact rotator cuff from 21.4 to 38.8 (effect size 2.9), in the OA group with a torn rotator cuff from 13.3 to 27.2 (effect size 2.1) and in the RA group from 13.7 to 28.0 (effect size 3.1). By this assessment, and for the survival analysis, there was no significant difference between the groups. However, when ratings using the patient satisfaction questions were analysed, eight (29.6%) of the RA group were ‘disappointed’, compared with one (9.1%) of the OA group with cuff intact and one (7.7%) of the OA group with cuff torn. All patients in the OA group with cuff torn indicated that they would undergo the operation again, compared to ten (90.9%) in the OA group with cuff intact and 20 (76.9%) in the RA group. The use of revision rates alone does not fully represent outcome after hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder. Data from PROMs provides more information about change in pain and the ability to undertake activities and perform tasks. The additional use of satisfaction ratings shows that both the rates of revision surgery and PROMs need careful interpretation in the context of patient expectations.
The aim of this study was to review the role
of clinical trial networks in orthopaedic surgery. A total of two
electronic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) were searched from inception
to September 2013 with no language restrictions. Articles related
to randomised controlled trials (RCTs), research networks and orthopaedic
research, were identified and reviewed. The usefulness of trainee-led
research collaborations is reported and our knowledge of current
clinical trial infrastructure further supplements the review. Searching
yielded 818 titles and abstracts, of which 12 were suitable for
this review. Results are summarised and presented narratively under
the following headings: 1) identifying clinically relevant research
questions; 2) education and training; 3) conduct of multicentre
RCTs and 4) dissemination and adoption of trial results. This review
confirms growing international awareness of the important role research
networks play in supporting trials in orthopaedic surgery. Multidisciplinary
collaboration and adequate investment in trial infrastructure are crucial
for successful delivery of RCTs. Cite this article:
The aim of this study was to define the incidence
of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and risk factors for the development
of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) after the resection of a musculoskeletal
tumour. A total of 94 patients who underwent resection of a musculoskeletal
tumour between January 2003 and December 2005 were prospectively
studied. There were 42 men and 52 women with a mean age of 54.4
years (18 to 86). All patients wore intermittent pneumatic compression
devices and graduated compression stockings. Ultrasound examination
of the lower limbs was conducted to screen for DVT between the fifth
and ninth post-operative days. DVT was detected in 21 patients (22%). Of these, two were symptomatic
(2%). One patient (1%) had a fatal pulmonary embolism. Patients
aged ≥ 70 years had an increased risk of DVT (p = 0.004). The overall incidence of DVT (both symptomatic and asymptomatic)
after resection of a musculoskeletal tumour with mechanical prophylaxis
was high. It seems that both mechanical and anticoagulant prophylaxis
is needed to prevent VTE in patients who have undergone the resection
of a musculoskeletal tumour. Cite this article:
We report a systematic review and meta-analysis
of published randomised and quasi-randomised trials evaluating the
efficacy of pre-operative skin antisepsis and cleansing techniques
in reducing foot and ankle skin flora. The post-preparation culture
number (Post-PCN) was the primary outcome. The data were evaluated
using a modified version of the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool. We
identified eight trials (560 participants, 716 feet) that met the inclusion
criteria. There was a significant difference in the proportions
of Post-PCN between hallux nailfold (HNF) and toe web spaces (TWS)
sites: 0.47 Meta-analyses showed that alcoholic chlorhexidine had better
efficacy than alcoholic povidone-iodine (PI) at HNF sites (risk
difference 0.19 (95% CI 0.08 to 0.30); p = 0.0005); a two-step intervention
using PI scrub and paint (S&
P) followed by alcohol showed significantly
better efficacy over PI (S&
P) alone at TWS sites (risk difference
0.13 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.24); p = 0.0169); and a two-step intervention
using chlorhexidine scrub followed by alcohol showed significantly
better efficacy over PI (S&
P) alone at the combined (HNF with
TWS) sites (risk difference 0.27 (95% CI 0.13 to 0.40); p <
0.0001).
No significant difference was found between cleansing techniques. Cite this article:
By and large, physicians and surgeons trust what they read, even if they take authors’ conclusions with a pinch of salt. There is a world of difference between being cautious about the implications of what you read and being defrauded by dishonest researchers. Fraud and scientific research are incompatible bedfellows and yet are an unhappy part of our research existence. All subspecialties are to blame and orthopaedics is no exception.
