1. At the present stage of our experience, when 150 patients have been analysed over a period of five years, the conclusion has been reached that anterior interbody fusion in the lower lumbar spine is a procedure which should be added to our surgical armamentarium for use in selected cases. 2. Patients suffering from chronic intervertebral disc degeneration whose main symptoms are recurrent incapacitating backache derive the most benefit from this procedure. 3. When used as a salvage operation in patients who have had previous unsuccessful laminectomy or posterior fusion, good results can be expected. 4. In patients with spondylolisthesis anterior interbody fusion should be confined to cases in which the vertebral bodies have not slipped forward more than one-third

1. Anterior transperitoneal lumbar fusion is a successful method of stabilising painful mechanical derangements which have not responded to the usual conservative measures. 2. The operation in this series was done mainly for backache; it should not be contemplated if there is definite evidence of nerve root compression, because sequestrated disc material cannot be removed from the spinal canal from the anterior route. 3. Careful technique has resulted in few complications attributable to the operation. 4. This method is sometimes thought to be inapplicable in cases of spondylolisthesis with a displacement of more than one-third. However, in this series we have seen the block type of graft used with a good measure of clinical and radiological success. 5. There is no doubt that for those patients who have had previous unsuccessful laminectomies or posterior fusions anterior interbody fusion offers an excellent prospect of recovery

1. The clinical experience of fourteen cases of traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis is described. 2. Evidence is presented which suggests that vertical compression and extension forces are frequently involved. 3. Treatment is based on recognition of the deforming force and its extent. 4. Primary treatment of unstable lesions by the coronally placed bone dowel of Barbour allows early stabilisation and long-term security. 5. The increased antero-posterior diameter of the axis explains the low incidence of spinal cord damage. 6. Skull traction is considered illogical in that it runs parallel in effect to the most deadly form of judicial hanging. 7. Secondary stability following injury may allow continuing force to fracture the spine at other levels. 8. The paradox of an extension injury between the second and third cervical vertebrae and a "flexion" injury at a lower level is discussed

There is ambiguity concerning the nomenclature and classification of fractures of the ring of the second cervical vertebra (C2). Disruption of the pars interarticularis which defines true traumatic spondylolisthesis of C2, is often wrongly called a pedicle fracture. Our aim in this study was to assess the influence of asymmetry on the anatomical and functional outcome and to evaluate the criteria of instability established by Roy-Camille et al. We studied the plain radiographs and CT scans of 24 patients: 13 were judged to be asymmetrical, ten were considered unstable and 14 stable. Treatment was with a Minerva jacket in 15 fractures and by operation in nine. Surgery was undertaken in patients with severe C2 to C3 sprains. One patient with an unstable lesion refused operation and was treated conservatively with a poor radiological result. Our study showed that asymmetry of the fracture did not affect the outcomes of treatment and should not therefore influence decisions in treatment. The criteria of Roy-Camille seem to be reliable and useful. We prefer the posterior approach to the cervical spine, which allows both stabilisation of the fracture and correction of a local kyphosis

This review shows that inter-body spinal fusion can be achieved in a satisfying percentage of cases, and the assertion that there is an intrinsic factor peculiar to the vertebral bodies which prevents such a fusion cannot be supported. The operation has a limited but definite place in the field of spinal surgery, and should be reserved for those patients with spinal instability associated with intractable and persistent backache. Spondylolisthesis is the indication par excellence. A new operative technique, which has been developed during ten years, has become standardised. The trans-sacral approach provides a better and safer exposure than those described before. In the event of failure of inter-body fusion, it is suggested that further attempts at grafting should be restricted to one of the posterior methods which have a 75 per cent chance of producing successful bony fusion. Clinical photographs are reproduced in Figures 16 to 18 to show that patients suffering from a painful spondylolisthesis may be restored to normal activity by this operation

We analysed the complications encountered in 102 consecutive patients who had posterolateral lumbosacral fusion performed with transpedicular screw and rod fixation for non-traumatic disorders after a minimum of two years. Of these, 40 had spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis, 42 a degenerative disorder, 14 instability after previous laminectomy and decompression, and six pain after nonunion of previous attempts at spinal fusion without internal fixation. There were 75 multilevel and 27 single-level fusions. There were 76 individual complications in 48 patients, and none in the other 54. The complications seen were screw misplacement, coupling failure of the device, wound infection, nonunion, permanent neural injury, and loosening, bending and breakage of screws. Screw breakage or loosening was more common in patients with multilevel fusions (p < 0.001). Screws of 5 mm diameter should not be used for sacral fixation. Forty-six patients had at least one further operation for one or several complications, including 20 fusion procedures for nonunion. The high incidence of complications is a disadvantage of this technically-demanding method

Two different classifications of discograms have been used in a prospective study of 279 injected discs in 100 patients. The five-stage classification of Adams, Dolan and Hutton (1986) showed increased degeneration in the lower lumbar discs and more degenerative changes in men than in women. Exact reproduction of the patient's pain on injection was more common in fissured or ruptured discs than in less degenerate discs, with 81% sensitivity and 64% specificity of the discogram for pain. The additional information obtained by comparing computerised tomography (CT) with discograms was minimal. Discography was found to be useful in the evaluation of chronic low back pain in patients whose ordinary CT scans, myelograms and flexion-extension radiographs were normal. In spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis, discography can disclose whether fusion needs to be extended above the lytic level, and it may show if the pain in patients who have had posterolateral fusion is discogenic. Thus, discography gives information which is useful in deciding whether to operate on patients with chronic low back pain

The fourth lumbar vertebrae and L4-5 discs from six cadaveric lumbar spines were subjected to detailed strain gauge analysis under conditions of controlled loading. With central compression loads, maximal compressive strain was found to occur near the bases of the pedicles and on both superficial and deep surfaces of the pars interarticularis, which emphasises the importance of the posterior elements of lumbar vertebrae in transmitting load. Radial bulge and tangential strain of the disc wall were maximal at the posterolateral surface, in agreement with the fact that disc degeneration and prolapse commonly occur there. Under posterior offset loads simulating extension, both compressive and tensile strains were found to be increased on both surfaces of the pars interarticularis, which suggests that hyperextension may lead to stress fractures and spondylolisthesis. Posterior offset loads also increased the radial bulge of the posterior disc wall and tangential strain at the anterior surface of the disc. Anterior offset loads simulating flexion increased the radial bulge of the anterior disc wall and tangential strain at the posterior surface of the disc. These findings are compatible with movement of the nucleus pulposus within the disc during flexion and extension. This hypothesis was supported by post-mortem discography

We have developed criteria to determine the appropriate indications for lumbar laminectomy, using the standard procedure developed at the RAND corporation and the University of California at Los Angeles (RAND-UCLA). A panel of five surgeons and four physicians individually assessed 1000 hypothetical cases of sciatica, back pain only, symptoms of spinal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, miscellaneous indications or the need for repeat laminectomy. For the first round each member of the panel used a scale ranging from 1 (extremely inappropriate) to 9 (extremely appropriate). After discussion and condensation of the results into three categories laminectomy was considered appropriate in 11% of the 1000 theoretical scenarios, equivocal in 26% and inappropriate in 63%. There was some variation between the six categories of malalignment, but full agreement in 64% of the hypothetical cases. We applied these criteria retrospectively to the records of 196 patients who had had surgical treatment for herniated discs in one Swiss University hospital. We found that 48% of the operations were for appropriate indications, 29% for equivocal reasons and that 23% were inappropriate. The RAND-UCLA method is a feasible, useful and coherent approach to the study of the indications for laminectomy and related procedures, providing a number of important insights. Our conclusions now require validation by carefully designed prospective clinical trials, such as those which are used for new medical techniques

Aims

The aim of this study was to explore risk factors for complications associated with dural tear (DT), including the types of DT, and the intra- and postoperative management of DT.

Aims

The aim of this study was to use diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to investigate changes in diffusion metrics in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) up to five years after decompressive surgery. We correlated these changes with clinical outcomes as scored by the Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) method, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

1. A relatively simple method of spinal fusion with internal splinting by screw fixation has been described. Complications have been few. 2. Emphasis is placed upon thorough removal of soft tissue, correct placement of screws of good length, the exposure of bleeding bone wherever possible in the fusion area, and the use of well packed cancellous bone. 3. There is enough spongy bone in one posterior superior iliac spine for an ordinary spinal fusion, and, if more is needed, the other is readily available through the same skin incision. Not only is cancellous bone more desirable than a massive cortical graft, but the leg is spared, allowing early walking and freedom from complications in the limb. 4. The lateral articulations are left intact. 5. Screw fixation has eliminated the use of external support except in spondylolisthesis, or when so much bone has been removed during laminectomy that good fixation cannot be obtained. 6. Early, sometimes immediate, relief of symptoms is usual after operation, and early walking with moderate activity is desirable. 7. When the operation was done for degenerative changes with no apparent defect in the laminae there was no radiological evidence of failure of fusion after operations at one level, but two failures were found after attempted fusions at multiple levels. 8. Root irritation from screw contact in two patients was due to faulty technique. A method of screw placement to avoid this complication is described and illustrated by radiographs and photographs of a cadaver specimen. 9. There has been no known instance of an adverse psychological effect from the use of screws. Rather, there has commonly been a lively and healthy interest shown in the factor which has allowed early activity

Aims

Chronic low back pain due to degenerative disc disease is sometimes treated with fusion. We compared the outcome of three different fusion techniques in the Swedish Spine Register: noninstrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF), instrumented posterolateral fusion (IPLF), and interbody fusion (IBF).