Early total hip replacement (THR) for acetabular
fractures offers accelerated rehabilitation, but a high risk of heterotopic
ossification (HO) has been reported. The purpose of this study was
to evaluate the incidence of HO, its associated risk factors and
functional impact. A total of 40 patients with acetabular fractures
treated with a THR weres retrospectively reviewed. The incidence
and severity of HO were evaluated using the modified Brooker classification,
and the functional outcome assessed. The overall incidence of HO
was 38%
(n = 15), with nine severe grade III cases. Patients who underwent
surgery early after injury had a fourfold increased chance of developing
HO. The mean blood loss and operating time were more than twice
that of those whose surgery was delayed (p = 0.002 and p <
0.001,
respectively). In those undergoing early THR, the incidence of grade
III HO was eight times higher than in those in whom THR was delayed
(p = 0.01). Only three of the seven patients with severe HO showed
good or excellent Harris hip scores compared with eight of nine
with class 0, I or II HO (p = 0.049). Associated musculoskeletal
injuries, high-energy trauma and head injuries were associated with
the development of grade III HO. The incidence of HO was significantly higher in patients with
a displaced acetabular fracture undergoing THR early compared with
those undergoing THR later and this had an adverse effect on the
functional outcome. Cite this article:
Bone allografts can store and release high levels of vancomycin. We present our results of a two-stage treatment for infected hip arthroplasty with acetabular and femoral impaction grafting using vancomycin-loaded allografts. We treated 29 patients (30 hips) by removal of the implants, meticulous debridement, parenteral antibiotic therapy and second-stage reconstruction using vancomycin-supplemented impacted bone allografts and a standard cemented Charnley femoral component. The mean follow-up was 32.4 months (24 to 60). Infection control was obtained in 29 cases (re-infection rate of 3.3%; 95% confidence interval 0.08 to 17) without evidence of progressive radiolucent lines, demarcation or graft resorption. One patient had a further infection ten months after revision caused by a different pathogen. Associated post-operative complications were one traumatic periprosthetic fracture at 14 months, a single dislocation in two hips and four displacements of the greater trochanter. Vancomycin-supplemented allografts restored bone stock and provided sound fixation with a low incidence of further infection.
Hip resurfacing is a bone-conserving procedure with respect to proximal femoral resection, but there is debate in the literature as to whether the same holds true for the acetabulum. We have investigated whether the Birmingham hip resurfacing conserves acetabular bone. Between 1998 and 2005, 500 Birmingham hip resurfacings were performed by two surgeons. Between 1996 and 2005 they undertook 700 primary hip replacements, with an uncemented acetabular component. These patients formed the clinical material to compare acetabular component sizing. The Birmingham hip resurfacing group comprised 350 hips in men and 150 hips in women. The uncemented total hip replacement group comprised 236 hips in men and 464 hips in women. Age- and gender-matched analysis of a cohort of patients for the sizes of the acetabular components required for the two types of replacement was also undertaken. Additionally, an analysis of the sizes of the components used by each surgeon was performed. For age-matched women, the mean outside diameter of the Birmingham hip resurfacing acetabular components was 2.03 mm less than that of the acetabular components in the uncemented total hip replacements (p <
0.0001). In similarly matched men there was no significant difference (p = 0.77). A significant difference was also found between the size of acetabular components used by the two surgeons for Birmingham hip resurfacing for both men (p = 0.0015) and women (p = 0.001). In contrast, no significant difference was found between the size of acetabular components used by the two surgeons for uncemented total hip replacement in either men or women (p = 0.06 and p = 0.14, respectively). This suggests that variations in acetabular preparation also influence acetabular component size in hip resurfacing.
