Little is known about employment following total knee arthroplasty
(TKA). This study aims to identify factors which predict return
to work following TKA in patients of working age in the United Kingdom. We prospectively assessed 289 patients (289 TKAs) aged ≤ 65 years
who underwent TKA between 2010 and 2013. There were 148 women. The
following were recorded pre-operatively: age, gender, body mass
index, social deprivation, comorbidities, indication for surgery,
work status and nature of employment, activity level as assessed by
the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score
and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). The intention of patients to return
to work or to retire was not assessed pre-operatively. At a mean
of 3.4 years (2 to 4) post-operatively, the return to work status,
OKS, the EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) score, UCLA activity score
and Work, Osteoarthritis and joint-Replacement (WORQ) score were
obtained. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.Aims
Patients &
Methods
Large-head metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip replacements
(THR) have given rise to concern. Comparative studies of small-head
MoM THRs over a longer follow-up period are lacking. Our objective
was to compare the incidence of complications such as infection,
dislocation, revision, adverse local tissue reactions, mortality
and radiological and clinical outcomes in small-head (28 mm) MoM
and ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) THRs up to 12 years post-operatively. A prospective cohort study included 3341 THRs in 2714 patients.
The mean age was 69.1 years (range 24 to 98) and 1848 (55.3%) were
performed in women, with a mean follow-up of 115 months (18 to 201).
There were 883 MoM and 2458 CoP bearings. Crude incidence rates
(cases/1000 person-years) were: infection 1.3 In conclusion, we found similar results for small-head MoM and
CoP bearings up to ten years post-operatively, but after ten years
MoM THRs had a higher risk of all-cause revision. Furthermore, the
presence of an adverse response to metal debris seen in the small-head
MOM group at revision is a cause for concern. Cite this article:
We report on the use of the Ilizarov method to
treat 40 consecutive fractures of the tibial shaft (35 AO 42C fractures and
five AO 42B3 fractures) in adults. There were 28 men and
12 women with a mean age of 43 years (19 to 81). The series included
19 open fractures (six Gustilo grade 3A and 13 grade 3B) and 21
closed injuries. The mean time from injury to application of definitive
Ilizarov frame was eight days (0 to 35) with 36 fractures successfully
uniting without the need for any bone-stimulating procedure. The
four remaining patients with nonunion healed with a second frame.
There were no amputations and no deep infections. None required
intervention for malunion. The total time to healing was calculated
from date of injury to removal of the frame, with a median of 166
days (mean 187, (87 to 370)). Minor complications included snapped
wires in two patients and minor pin-site infections treated with
oral antibiotics in nine patients (23%). Clinical scores were available
for 32 of the 40 patients at a median of 55 months (mean 62, (26
to 99)) post-injury, with ‘good’ Olerud and Molander ankle scores
(median 80, mean 75, (10 to 100)), ‘excellent’ Lysholm knee scores
(median 97, mean 88, (29 to 100)), a median Tegner activity score
of 4 (mean 4, (0 to 9)) (comparable to ‘moderately heavy labour
/ cycling and jogging’) and Short Form-12 scores that exceeded the
mean of the population as a whole (median physical component score
55 (mean 51, (20 to 64)), median mental component score 57 (mean
53, (21 to 62)). In conclusion, the Ilizarov method is a safe and
reliable way of treating complex tibial shaft fractures with a high
rate of primary union.
We prospectively assessed the efficacy of a ceramic-on-metal
(CoM) hip bearing with uncemented acetabular and femoral components
in which cobalt–chrome acetabular liners and alumina ceramic heads
were used. The cohort comprised 94 total hip replacements (THRs) in 83 patients
(38 women and 45 men) with a mean age of 58 years (42 to 70). Minimum
follow-up was two years. All patients had pre- and post-operative
assessment using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis
index (WOMAC), Oxford hip score and Short-Form 12 scores. All showed
a statistically significant improvement from three months post-operatively
onwards (all p <
0.001). After two years whole blood metal ion levels were measured and
chromosomal analysis was performed. The levels of all metal ions
were elevated except vanadium. Levels of chromium, cobalt, molybdenum
and titanium were significantly higher in patients who underwent
bilateral THR compared with those undergoing unilateral THR (p <
0.001).
Chromosomal analysis demonstrated both structural and aneuploidy
mutations. There were significantly more breaks and losses than
in the normal population (p <
0.001). There was no significant
difference in chromosomal aberration between those undergoing unilateral
and bilateral procedures (all analyses p ≥ 0.62). The use of a CoM THR is effective clinically in the short-term,
with no concerns, but the significance of high metal ion levels
and chromosomal aberrations in the long-term remains unclear. Cite this article:
A lack of connection between surgeons and patients in evaluating
the outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has led to the search
for the ideal patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to evaluate
these procedures. We hypothesised that the desired psychometric properties
of the ideal outcome tool have not been uniformly addressed in studies describing
TKA PROMS. A systematic review was conducted investigating one or more facets
of patient-reported scores for measuring primary TKA outcome. Studies
were analysed by study design, subject demographics, surgical technique,
and follow-up adequacy, with the ‘gold standard’ of psychometric
properties being systematic development, validity, reliability,
and responsiveness.Objectives
Methods
The aim of this study was to evaluate the ten-year
clinical and functional outcome of hip resurfacing and to compare it
with that of cementless hip arthroplasty in patients under the age
of 55 years. Between 1999 and 2002, 80 patients were enrolled into the study:
24 were randomised (11 to hip resurfacing, 13 to total hip arthroplasty),
18 refused hip resurfacing and chose cementless total hip arthroplasty
with a 32 mm bearing, and 38 insisted on resurfacing. The mean follow-up
for all patients was 12.1 years (10 to 14). Patients were assessed clinically and radiologically at one year,
five years and ten years. Outcome measures included EuroQol EQ5D,
Oxford, Harris hip, University of California Los Angeles and University
College Hospital functional scores. No differences were seen between the two groups in the Oxford
or Harris hip scores or in the quality of life scores. Despite a
similar aspiration to activity pre-operatively, a higher proportion
of patients with a hip resurfacing were running and involved in
sport and heavy manual labour after ten years. We found significantly higher function scores in patients who
had undergone hip resurfacing than in those with a cementless hip
arthroplasty at ten years. This suggests a functional advantage
for hip resurfacing. There were no other attendant problems. Cite this article:
We carried out a prospective, continuous study on 529 patients who underwent primary total knee replacement between January 2006 and December 2007 at a major teaching hospital. The aim was to investigate weight change and the functional and clinical outcome in non-obese and obese groups at 12 months post-operatively. The patients were grouped according to their pre-operative body mass index (BMI) as follows: non-obese (BMI <
30 kg/m2), obese (BMI At 12 months, a clinically significant weight loss of ≥ 5% had occurred in 40 (12.6%) of the obese patients, but 107 (21%) gained weight. The change in the International Knee Society score was less in obese and morbidly obese compared with non-obese patients (p = 0.016). Adverse events occurred in 30 (14.2%) of the non-obese, 59 (22.6%) of the obese and 20 (35.1%) of the morbidly obese patients (p = 0.001).
This was a randomised controlled trial studying
the safety of a new short metaphyseal fixation (SMF) stem. We hypothesised
that it would have similar early clinical results and micromovement
to those of a standard-length tapered Synergy metaphyseal fixation
stem. Using radiostereometric analysis (RSA) we compared the two
stems in 43 patients. A short metaphyseal fixation stem was used
in 22 patients and a Synergy stem in 21 patients. No difference
was found in the clinical outcomes pre- or post-operatively between
groups. RSA showed no significant differences two years post-operatively
in mean micromovement between the two stems (except for varus/valgus tilt
at p = 0.05) (subsidence 0.94 mm ( Cite this article:
Satisfaction with care is important to both patients
and to those who pay for it. The Net Promoter Score (NPS), widely
used in the service industries, has been introduced into the NHS
as the ‘friends and family test’; an overarching measure of patient
satisfaction. It assesses the likelihood of the patient recommending
the healthcare received to another, and is seen as a discriminator
of healthcare performance. We prospectively assessed 6186 individuals
undergoing primary lower limb joint replacement at a single university
hospital to determine the Net Promoter Score for joint replacements
and to evaluate which factors contributed to the response. Achieving pain relief (odds ratio (OR) 2.13, confidence interval
(CI) 1.83 to 2.49), the meeting of pre-operative expectation (OR
2.57, CI 2.24 to 2.97), and the hospital experience (OR 2.33, CI
2.03 to 2.68) are the domains that explain whether a patient would
recommend joint replacement services. These three factors, combined
with the type of surgery undertaken (OR 2.31, CI 1.68 to 3.17),
drove a predictive model that was able to explain 95% of the variation
in the patient’s recommendation response. Though intuitively similar,
this ‘recommendation’ metric was found to be materially different
to satisfaction responses. The difference between THR (NPS 71) and
TKR (NPS 49) suggests that no overarching score for a department
should be used without an adjustment for case mix. However, the
Net Promoter Score does measure a further important dimension to
our existing metrics: the patient experience of healthcare delivery. Cite this article:
The technical advances in arthroscopic surgery
of the hip, including the improved ability to manage the capsule
and gain extensile exposure, have been paralleled by a growth in
the number of conditions that can be addressed. This expanding list
includes symptomatic labral tears, chondral lesions, injuries of
the ligamentum teres, femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), capsular
laxity and instability, and various extra-articular disorders, including snapping
hip syndromes. With a careful diagnostic evaluation and technical
execution of well-indicated procedures, arthroscopic surgery of
the hip can achieve successful clinical outcomes, with predictable
improvements in function and pre-injury levels of physical activity
for many patients. This paper reviews the current position in relation to the use
of arthroscopy in the treatment of disorders of the hip. Cite this article:
The foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS) has been
evaluated for many conditions of the foot and ankle. We evaluated
its construct validity in 136 patients with osteoarthritis of the
ankle, its content validity in 37 patients and its responsiveness
in 39. Data were collected prospectively from the registry of patients
at our institution. All FAOS subscales were rated relevant by patients. The Pain,
Activities of Daily Living, and Quality of Life subscales showed
good correlation with the Physical Component score of the Short-Form-12v2.
All subscales except Symptoms were responsive to change after surgery. We concluded that the FAOS is a weak instrument for evaluating
osteoarthritis of the ankle. However, some of the FAOS subscales
have relative strengths that allow for its limited use while we
continue to seek other satisfactory outcome instruments. Cite this article:
The role of computer-assisted surgery in maintaining the level of the joint in primary knee joint replacement (TKR) has not been well defined. We undertook a blinded randomised controlled trial comparing joint-line maintenance, functional outcomes, and quality-of-life outcomes between patients undergoing computer-assisted and conventional TKR. A total of 115 patients were randomised (computer-assisted, n = 55; conventional, n = 60). Two years post-operatively no significant correlation was found between computer-assisted and conventional surgery in terms of maintaining the joint line. Those TKRs where the joint line was depressed post-operatively improved the least in terms of functional scores. No difference was detected in terms of quality-of-life outcomes. Change in joint line was found to be related to change in alignment. Change in alignment significantly affects change in joint line and functional scores.
We undertook a randomised controlled trial to
compare the piriformis-sparing approach with the standard posterior approach
used for total hip replacement (THR). We recruited 100 patients
awaiting THR and randomly allocated them to either the piriformis-sparing
approach or the standard posterior approach. Pre- and post-operative
care programmes and rehabilitation regimes were identical for both
groups. Observers were blinded to the allocation throughout; patients
were blinded until the two-week assessment. Follow-up was at six
weeks, three months, one year and two years. In all 11 patients
died or were lost to follow-up. There was no significant difference between groups for any of
the functional outcomes. However, for patients in the piriformis-sparing
group there was a trend towards a better six-minute walk test at
two weeks and greater patient satisfaction at six weeks. The acetabular
components were less anteverted (p = 0.005) and had a lower mean
inclination angle (p = 0.02) in the piriformis-sparing group. However,
in both groups the mean component positions were within Lewinnek’s
safe zone. Surgeons perceived the piriformis-sparing approach to
be significantly more difficult than the standard approach (p =
0.03), particularly in obese patients. In conclusion, performing THR through a shorter incision involving
sparing piriformis is more difficult and only provides short-term
benefits compared with the standard posterior approach.
The Advance Medial-Pivot total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was designed
to reflect contemporary data regarding the kinematics of the knee.
We wished to examine the long-term results obtained with this prosthesis
by extending a previous evaluation. We retrospectively evaluated prospectively collected data from
225 consecutive patients (41 men and 184 women; mean age at surgery
71 years, 52 to 84) who underwent 284 TKAs with a mean follow-up
of 13.4 years (11 to 15). Implant failure, complication rate, clinical (both
subjective and objective) and radiological outcome were assessed.
Pre- and post-operative clinical and radiographic data were available
at regular intervals for all patients. A total of ten patients (4.4%;
ten TKAs) were lost to follow-up.Aims
Patients and Methods
Radiological evidence of post-traumatic osteoarthritis
(PTOA) after fracture of the tibial plateau is common but end-stage arthritis
which requires total knee arthroplasty is much rarer. The aim of this study was to examine the indications for, and
outcomes of, total knee arthroplasty after fracture of the tibial
plateau and to compare this with an age and gender-matched cohort
of TKAs carried out for primary osteoarthritis. Between 1997 and 2011, 31 consecutive patients (23 women, eight
men) with a mean age of 65 years (40 to 89) underwent TKA at a mean
of 24 months (2 to 124) after a fracture of the tibial plateau.
Of these, 24 had undergone ORIF and seven had been treated non-operatively.
Patients were assessed pre-operatively and at 6, 12 and >
60 months
using the Short Form-12, Oxford Knee Score and a patient satisfaction
score. Patients with instability or nonunion needed total knee arthroplasty
earlier (14 and 13.3 months post-injury) than those with intra-articular
malunion (50 months, p <
0.001). Primary cruciate-retaining implants
were used in 27 (87%) patients. Complication rates were higher in
the PTOA cohort and included wound complications (13% Total knee arthroplasty undertaken after fracture of the tibial
plateau has a higher rate of complications than that undertaken
for primary osteoarthritis, but patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction
are comparable. Cite this article:
The purpose of this study was to examine the
complications and outcomes of total hip replacement (THR) in super-obese
patients (body mass index (BMI) >
50 kg/m2) compared
with class I obese (BMI 30 to 34.9 kg/m2) and normal-weight
patients (BMI 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2), as defined by the
World Health Organization. A total of 39 THRs were performed in 30 super-obese patients
with a mean age of 53 years (31 to 72), who were followed for a
mean of 4.2 years (2.0 to 11.7). This group was matched with two
cohorts of normal-weight and class I obese patients, each comprising
39 THRs in 39 patients. Statistical analysis was performed to determine differences
among these groups with respect to complications and satisfaction
based on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) osteoarthritis
index, the Harris hip score (HHS) and the Short-Form (SF)-12 questionnaire. Super-obese patients experienced significantly longer hospital
stays and higher rates of major complications and readmissions than
normal-weight and class I obese patients. Although super-obese patients
demonstrated reduced pre-operative and post-operative satisfaction
scores, there was no significant difference in improvement, or change in
the score, with respect to HHS or the WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Super-obese patients obtain similar satisfaction outcomes as
class I obese and normal-weight patients with respect to improvement
in their scores. However, they experience a significant increase
in length of hospital stay and major complication and readmission
rates. Cite this article: