The outcome after total hip replacement has improved
with the development of surgical techniques, better pain management
and the introduction of enhanced recovery pathways. These pathways
require a multidisciplinary team to manage pre-operative education,
multimodal pain control and accelerated rehabilitation. The current economic
climate and restricted budgets favour brief hospitalisation while
minimising costs. This has put considerable pressure on hospitals
to combine excellent results, early functional recovery and shorter
admissions. In this review we present an evidence-based summary of some common
interventions and methods, including pre-operative patient education,
pre-emptive analgesia, local infiltration analgesia, pre-operative
nutrition, the use of pulsed electromagnetic fields, peri-operative
rehabilitation, wound dressings, different surgical techniques, minimally
invasive surgery and fast-track joint replacement units. Cite this article:
Early and accurate prediction of hospital length-of-stay
(LOS) in patients undergoing knee replacement is important for economic
and operational reasons. Few studies have systematically developed
a multivariable model to predict LOS. We performed a retrospective
cohort study of 1609 patients aged ≥ 50 years who underwent elective,
primary total or unicompartmental knee replacements. Pre-operative
candidate predictors included patient demographics, knee function,
self-reported measures, surgical factors and discharge plans. In
order to develop the model, multivariable regression with bootstrap
internal validation was used. The median LOS for the sample was
four days (interquartile range 4 to 5). Statistically significant
predictors of longer stay included older age, greater number of comorbidities,
less knee flexion range of movement, frequent feelings of being
down and depressed, greater walking aid support required, total
( Cite this article:
In a randomised controlled pragmatic trial we
investigated whether local infiltration analgesia would result in earlier
readiness for discharge from hospital after total knee replacement
(TKR) than patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) plus femoral
nerve block. A total of 45 patients with a mean age of 65 years
(49 to 81) received a local infiltration with a peri-articular injection
of bupivacaine, morphine and methylprednisolone, as well as adjuvant
analgesics. In 45 PCEA+femoral nerve blockade patients with a mean
age of 67 years (50 to 84), analgesia included a bupivacaine nerve
block, bupivacaine/hydromorphone PCEA, and adjuvant analgesics.
The mean time until ready for discharge was 3.2 days (1 to 14) in
the local infiltration group and 3.2 days (1.8 to 7.0) in the PCEA+femoral
nerve blockade group. The mean pain scores for patients receiving
local infiltration were higher when walking (p = 0.0084), but there
were no statistically significant differences at rest. The mean
opioid consumption was higher in those receiving local infiltration. The choice between these two analgesic pathways should not be
made on the basis of time to discharge after surgery. Most secondary
outcomes were similar, but PCEA+femoral nerve blockade patients
had lower pain scores when walking and during continuous passive
movement. If PCEA+femoral nerve blockade is not readily available, local
infiltration provides similar length of stay and similar pain scores
at rest following TKR. Cite this article:
The February 2014 Spine Roundup360 looks at: single posterior approach for severe kyphosis; risk factors for recurrent disc herniation; dysphagia and cervical disc replacement or fusion; hang on to your topical antibiotics; cost-effective lumbar disc replacement; anxiolytics no role to play in acute lumbar back pain; and surgery best for lumbar disc herniation.
Total knee replacement (TKR) is one of the most
common operations in orthopaedic surgery worldwide. Despite its
scientific reputation as mainly successful, only 81% to 89% of patients
are satisfied with the final result. Our understanding of this discordance
between patient and surgeon satisfaction is limited. In our experience,
focus on five major factors can improve patient satisfaction rates:
correct patient selection, setting of appropriate expectations,
avoiding preventable complications, knowledge of the finer points
of the operation, and the use of both pre- and post-operative pathways.
Awareness of the existence, as well as the identification of predictors
of patient–surgeon discordance should potentially help with enhancing
patient outcomes. Cite this article:
Permanent growth arrest of the longer bone is
an option in the treatment of minor leg-length discrepancies. The
use of a tension band plating technique to produce a temporary epiphysiodesis
is appealing as it avoids the need for accurate timing of the procedure
in relation to remaining growth. We performed an animal study to
establish if control of growth in a long bone is possible with tension
band plating. Animals (pigs) were randomised to temporary epiphysiodesis
on either the right or left tibia. Implants were removed after ten
weeks. Both tibiae were examined using MRI at baseline, and after
ten and 15 weeks. The median interphyseal distance was significantly shorter
on the treated tibiae after both ten weeks (p = 0.04) and 15 weeks
(p = 0.04). On T1-weighted images the metaphyseal water
content was significantly reduced after ten weeks on the treated
side (p = 0.04) but returned to values comparable with the untreated
side at 15 weeks (p = 0.14). Return of growth was observed in all
animals after removal of implants. Temporary epiphysiodesis can be obtained using tension band plating.
The technique is not yet in common clinical practice but might avoid
the need for the accurate timing of epiphysiodesis. Cite this article:
The April 2013 Research Roundup360 looks at: when the ‘residency cake’ is done; steroids, stem cells and tendons; what exactly is osteoarthritis; platelet-rich plasma; CRPS; d-Dimer for DVT; reducing bacterial adhesion; and fin or limb?
Autologous retransfusion and no-drainage are
both blood-saving measures in total hip replacement (THR). A new combined
intra- and post-operative autotransfusion filter system has been
developed especially for primary THR, and we conducted a randomised
controlled blinded study comparing this with no-drainage. A total of 204 THR patients were randomised to autologous blood
transfusion (ABT)
(n = 102) or no-drainage (n = 102). In the ABT group, a mean of
488 ml ( The use of a new intra- and post-operative autologous blood transfusion
filter system results in less total blood loss and a smaller maximum
decrease in haemoglobin levels than no-drainage following primary
THR. Cite this article:
Malunion is the most common complication of the
distal radius with many modalities of treatment available for such
a problem. The use of bone grafting after an osteotomy is still
recommended by most authors. We hypothesised that bone grafting
is not required; fixing the corrected construct with a volar locked
plate helps maintain the alignment, while metaphyseal defect fills
by itself. Prospectively, we performed the procedure on 30 malunited
dorsally-angulated radii using fixed angle volar locked plates without
bone grafting. At the final follow-up, 22 wrists were available.
Radiological evidence of union, correction of the deformity, clinical
and functional improvement was achieved in all cases. Without the
use of bone grafting, corrective open wedge osteotomy fixed by a
volar locked plate provides a high rate of union and satisfactory
functional outcomes.
The purpose of this study was to investigate
whether a gender-specific high-flexion posterior-stabilised (PS)
total knee replacement (TKR) would offer advantages over a high-flex
PS TKR regarding range of movement (ROM), ‘feel’ of the knee, pain
and satisfaction, as well as during activity. A total of 24 female
patients with bilateral osteoarthritis entered this prospective,
blind randomised trial in which they received a high-flex PS TKR
in one knee and a gender-specific high-flexion PS TKR in the other
knee. At follow-up, patients were assessed clinically measuring
ROM, and questioned about pain, satisfaction and daily ‘feel’ of
each knee. Patients underwent gait analysis pre-operatively and
at one year, which yielded kinematic, kinetic and temporospatial
parameters indicative of knee function during gait. At final follow-up
we found no statistically significant differences in ROM (p = 0.82).
The median pain score was 0 (0 to 8) in both groups (p = 0.95).
The median satisfaction score was 9 (4 to 10) in the high-flex group
and 8 (0 to 10) in the gender-specific group (p = 0.98). The median
‘feel’ score was 9 (3 to 10) in the high-flex group and 8 (0 to
10) in the gender-specific group (p = 0.66). Gait analysis showed
no statistically significant differences between the two prosthetic
designs in any kinematic, kinetic or temporospatial parameters. Both designs produced good clinical results with
The use of autograft bone is the best option
when undertaking a procedure that requires bone graft because it
is osteogenic, osteoconductive and osseo-inductive. Pain, morbidity
and complications associated with harvesting iliac or non-iliac
sites occur in between 6% and 30% of cases. An alternative source
of graft with possibly a lower morbidity is the intramedullary canal.
In this study, 28 patients undergoing 30 arthrodesis procedures
on the hindfoot had a mean of 48 cm3 (43 to 50) of bone
harvested locally from the hindfoot or the tibial shaft by antegrade or
retrograde reaming. No patient sustained a fracture of the calcaneum,
talus or tibia. There was no morbidity except for one complication
when the reamer breached the medial tibial cortex. This healed uneventfully. This method of using the reamer–irrigator–aspirator system is
an extension of the standard technique of intramedullary reaming
of the lower limb: it produces good-quality bone graft with viable
growth factors consistent with that of the iliac crest, and donor
site morbidity is low. This is an efficient method of obtaining
autologous bone for use in arthrodesis of the ankle or hindfoot.
The management of patients with a painful total knee replacement requires careful assessment and a stepwise approach in order to diagnose the underlying pathology accurately. The management should include a multidisciplinary approach to the patient’s pain as well as addressing the underlying aetiology. Pain should be treated with appropriate analgesia, according to the analgesic ladder of the World Health Organisation. Special measures should be taken to identify and to treat any neuropathic pain. There are a number of intrinsic and extrinsic causes of a painful knee replacement which should be identified and treated early. Patients with unexplained pain and without any recognised pathology should be treated conservatively since they may improve over a period of time and rarely do so after a revision operation.
The aim of this prospective single-centre study
was to assess the difference in clinical outcome between total knee replacement
(TKR) using computerised navigation and that of conventional TKR.
We hypothesised that navigation would give a better result at every
stage within the first five years. A total of 195 patients (195
knees) with a mean age of 70.0 years (39 to 89) were allocated alternately
into two treatment groups, which used either conventional instrumentation
(group A, 97 knees) or a navigation system (group B, 98 knees).
After five years, complete clinical scores were available for 121
patients (62%). A total of 18 patients were lost to follow-up. Compared
with conventional surgery, navigated TKR resulted in a better mean
Knee Society score (p = 0.008). The difference in mean Knee Society
scores over time between the two groups was not constant (p = 0.006),
which suggests that these groups differed in their response to surgery
with time. No significant difference in the frequency of malalignment
was seen between the two groups. In summary, computerised navigation resulted in a better functional
outcome at five years than conventional techniques. Given the similarity
in mechanical alignment between the two groups, rotational alignment
may prove to be a better method of identifying differences in clinical
outcome after navigated surgery.
The outcomes of 261 nerve injuries in 100 patients
were graded good in 173 cases (66%), fair in 70 (26.8%) and poor in
18 (6.9%) at the final review (median 28.4 months (1.3 to 64.2)).
The initial grades for the 42 sutures and graft were 11 good, 14
fair and 17 poor. After subsequent revision repairs in seven, neurolyses
in 11 and free vascularised fasciocutaneous flaps in 11, the final
grades were 15 good, 18 fair and nine poor. Pain was relieved in
30 of 36 patients by nerve repair, revision of repair or neurolysis,
and flaps when indicated. The difference in outcome between penetrating
missile wounds and those caused by explosions was not statistically
significant; in the latter group the onset of recovery from focal
conduction block was delayed (mean 4.7 months (2.5 to 10.2)
The aim of this study was to examine the rates
and potential risk factors for 28-day re-admission following a fracture
of the hip at a high-volume tertiary care hospital. We retrospectively
reviewed 467 consecutive patients with a fracture of the hip treated
in the course of one year. Causes and risk factors for unplanned
28-day re-admissions were examined using univariate and multivariate
analysis, including the difference in one-year mortality. A total
of 55 patients (11.8%) were re-admitted within 28 days of discharge.
The most common causes were pneumonia in 15 patients (27.3%), dehydration
and renal dysfunction in ten (18.2%) and deteriorating mobility
in ten (18.2%). A moderate correlation was found between chest infection
during the initial admission and subsequent re-admission with pneumonia
(r = 0.44, p <
0.001). A significantly higher mortality rate
at one year was seen in the re-admission group (41.8% (23 of 55)
Recurrence of back or leg pain after discectomy
is a well-recognised problem with an incidence of up to 28%. Once conservative
measures have failed, several surgical options are available and
have been tried with varying degrees of success. In this study,
42 patients with recurrent symptoms after discectomy underwent less
invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion (LI-PLIF). Clinical outcome
was measured using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form
36 (SF-36) questionnaires and visual analogue scales for back (VAS-BP)
and leg pain (VAS-LP). There was a statistically significant improvement
in all outcome measures (p <
0.001). The debate around which
procedure is the most effective for these patients remains controversial. Our results show that LI-PLIF is as effective as any other surgical
procedure. However, given that it is less invasive, we feel that
it should be considered as the preferred option.
We undertook a randomised controlled trial to
compare the piriformis-sparing approach with the standard posterior approach
used for total hip replacement (THR). We recruited 100 patients
awaiting THR and randomly allocated them to either the piriformis-sparing
approach or the standard posterior approach. Pre- and post-operative
care programmes and rehabilitation regimes were identical for both
groups. Observers were blinded to the allocation throughout; patients
were blinded until the two-week assessment. Follow-up was at six
weeks, three months, one year and two years. In all 11 patients
died or were lost to follow-up. There was no significant difference between groups for any of
the functional outcomes. However, for patients in the piriformis-sparing
group there was a trend towards a better six-minute walk test at
two weeks and greater patient satisfaction at six weeks. The acetabular
components were less anteverted (p = 0.005) and had a lower mean
inclination angle (p = 0.02) in the piriformis-sparing group. However,
in both groups the mean component positions were within Lewinnek’s
safe zone. Surgeons perceived the piriformis-sparing approach to
be significantly more difficult than the standard approach (p =
0.03), particularly in obese patients. In conclusion, performing THR through a shorter incision involving
sparing piriformis is more difficult and only provides short-term
benefits compared with the standard posterior approach.
We compared inflammation in the knee after total knee replacement (TKR) for primary osteoarthritis between two groups of patients undergoing joint replacement with and without synovectomy. A total of 67 patients who underwent unilateral TKR were randomly divided into group I, TKR without synovectomy, and group II, TKR with synovectomy. Clinical outcomes, serial serum inflammatory markers (including interleukin-6 (IL-6), CRP and ESR) and the difference in temperature of the skin of the knee, compared with the contralateral side, were sequentially evaluated until 26 weeks after surgery. Pre-operatively, there were no statistically different clinical parameters between groups I and II. At the 26-week follow-up, both groups had a similarly significantly improved American Knee Society clinical score (p <
0.001) and functional score (p <
0.001) with no differences between the groups. Similar changes in serial inflammatory markers were found in both groups, including mean peak levels of IL-6 (189 pg/ml ( We concluded that synovectomy at the time of TKR does not provide any benefit to the clinical outcome or shorten the duration of the inflammatory response after surgery.
Bilateral simultaneous total knee replacement (TKR) has been considered by some to be associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Our study analysed the outcome of 150 consecutive, but selected, bilateral simultaneous TKRs and compared them with that of 271 unilateral TKRs in a standardised fast-track setting. The procedures were performed between 2003 and 2009. Apart from staying longer in hospital (mean 4.7 days (2 to 16)
The aim of this study was to review the number of patients operated on for traumatic disruption of the pubic symphysis who developed radiological signs of movement of the anterior pelvic metalwork during the first post-operative year, and to determine whether this had clinical implications. A consecutive series of 49 patients undergoing internal fixation of a traumatic diastasis of the pubic symphysis were studied. All underwent anterior fixation of the diastasis, which was frequently combined with posterior pelvic fixation. The fractures were divided into groups using the Young and Burgess classification for pelvic ring fractures. The different combinations of anterior and posterior fixation adopted to stabilise the fractures and the type of movement of the metalwork which was observed were analysed and related to functional outcome during the first post-operative year. In 15 patients the radiographs showed movement of the anterior metalwork, with broken or mobile screws or plates, and in six there were signs of a recurrent diastasis. In this group, four patients required revision surgery; three with anterior fixation and one with removal of anterior pelvic metalwork; the remaining 11 functioned as well as the rest of the study group. We conclude that radiological signs of movement in the anterior pelvic metalwork, albeit common, are not in themselves an indication for revision surgery.