The aim of this study was to report the long-term outcome and
implant survival of the lateral resurfacing elbow (LRE) arthroplasty
in the treatment of elbow arthritis. We reviewed a consecutive series of 27 patients (30 elbows) who
underwent LRE arthroplasty between December 2005 and January 2008.
There were 15 women and 12 men, with a mean age of 61 years (25
to 82). The diagnosis was primary hypotrophic osteoarthritis (OA)
in 12 patients (14 elbows), post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA)
in five (five elbows) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in ten patients
(11 elbows). The mean clinical outcome scores including the Mayo
Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), the American Shoulder and Elbow
Surgeons elbow score (ASES-e), the mean range of movement and the
radiological outcome were recorded at three, six and 12 months and
at a mean final follow-up of 8.3 years (7.3 to 9.4). A one sample Aim
Patients and Methods
The primary aim of this study was to define the standard minimum
follow-up required to produce a reliable estimate of the rate of
re-operation after radial head arthroplasty (RHA). The secondary
objective was to define the leading reasons for re-operation. Four electronic databases, between January 2000 and March 2017
were searched. Articles reporting reasons for re-operation (Group
I) and results (Group II) after RHA were included. In Group I, a
meta-analysis was performed to obtain the standard minimum follow-up,
the mean time to re-operation and the reason for failure. In Group
II, the minimum follow-up for each study was compared with the standard
minimum follow-up.Aims
Materials and Methods
The aim of this prospective randomised controlled trial was to
compare non-operative and operative management for acute isolated
displaced fractures of the olecranon in patients aged ≥ 75 years. Patients were randomised to either non-operative management or
operative management with either tension-band wiring or fixation
with a plate. They were reviewed at six weeks, three and six months
and one year after the injury. The primary outcome measure was the
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at one year.Aims
Patients and Methods
Revision total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) is often challenging.
The aim of this study was to report on the clinical and radiological
results of revision arthroplasty of the elbow with the Latitude
TEA. Between 2006 and 2010 we used the Latitude TEA for revision in
18 consecutive elbows (17 patients); mean age 53 years (28 to 80);
14 women. A Kudo TEA was revised in 15 elbows and a Souter-Strathclyde
TEA in three. Stability, range of movement (ROM), visual analogue score (VAS)
for pain and functional scores, Elbow Functional Assessment Scale
(EFAS), the Functional Rating Index of Broberg and Morrey (FRIBM)
and the Modified Andrews’ Elbow Scoring System (MAESS) were assessed
pre-operatively and at each post-operative follow-up visit (six,
12 months and biennially thereafter). Radiographs were analysed
for loosening, fractures and dislocation. The mean follow-up was
59 months (26 to 89).Aims
Patients and Methods
This study compares the outcomes of two methods
of fixation of displaced fractures of the radial neck. The 58 patients
with a mean age of 38.5 years (18 to 56), were treated in a non
randomised study with screws (n = 29) or a plate and screws (n =
29) according to the surgeon’s preference. The patients were reviewed at one year. Radiographs and functional
evaluations were carried out up to one year post-operatively, using
the Broberg and Morrey functional evaluation score, range of movement,
and assessment of complications. The mean functional scores did not differ significantly between
groups (90 (55 to 100) Cite this article:
The use of passive stretching of the elbow after
arthrolysis is controversial. We report the results of open arthrolysis in
81 patients. Prospectively collected outcome data with a minimum
follow-up of one year were analysed. All patients had sustained
an intra-articular fracture initially and all procedures were performed
by the same surgeon under continuous brachial plexus block anaesthesia
and with continuous passive movement (CPM) used post-operatively
for two to three days. CPM was used to maintain the movement achieved
during surgery and passive stretching was not used at any time.
A senior physiotherapist assessed all the patients at regular intervals.
The mean range of movement (ROM) improved from 69° to 109° and the
function and pain of the upper limb improved from 32 to 16 and from
20 to 10, as assessed by the Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and
Hand score and a visual analogue scale, respectively. The greatest
improvement was obtained in the stiffest elbows: nine patients with
a pre-operative ROM <
30° achieved a mean post-operative ROM
of 92° (55° to 125°). This study demonstrates that in patients with
a stiff elbow after injury, good results may be obtained after open
elbow arthrolysis without using passive stretching during rehabilitation.
The June 2014 Trauma Roundup360 looks at: BMP use increasing wound complication rates in trauma surgery; can we predict re-admission in trauma?; humeral bundle nailing; how best to treat high-angle femoral neck fractures?; hyperglycaemia and infection; simultaneous soft-tissue and bony repair in terrible triad injuries; metaphyseal malunion in the forearm leading to function restrictions; delayed fixation of the distal radius: not a bad option; and fasciotomies better with shoelaces
Fracture clinics are often characterised by the referral of large
numbers of unselected patients with minor injuries not requiring
investigation or intervention, long waiting times and recurrent
unnecessary reviews. Our experience had been of an unsustainable
system and we implemented a ‘Trauma Triage Clinic’ (TTC) in order
to rationalise and regulate access to our fracture service. The
British Orthopaedic Association’s guidelines have required a prospective evaluation
of this change of practice, and we report our experience and results. We review the management of all 12 069 patients referred to our
service in the calendar year 2014, with a minimum of one year follow-up
during the calendar year 2015. Aims
Patients and Methods
The United States and Canada are in the midst
of an epidemic of the use, misuse and overdose of opioids, and deaths
related to overdose. This is the direct result of overstatement
of the benefits and understatement of the risks of using opioids
by advocates and pharmaceutical companies. Massive amounts of prescription
opioids entered the community and were often diverted and misused.
Most other parts of the world achieve comparable pain relief using
fewer opioids. The misconceptions about opioids that created this epidemic are
finding their way around the world. There is particular evidence
of the increased prescription of strong opioids in Europe. Opioids are addictive and dangerous. Evidence is mounting that
the best pain relief is obtained through resilience. Opioids are
often prescribed when treatments to increase resilience would be
more effective. Cite this article:
