Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 89 of 89
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 3 | Pages 289 - 289
1 Mar 2013
Villar RN


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 8 | Pages 833 - 836
1 Aug 2023
Mancino F Gant V Meek DRM Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 1 | Pages 6 - 8
1 Jan 2024
Stevenson J Cool P Ashford R

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(1):6–8.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 2 | Pages 108 - 110
1 Feb 2024
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 7 | Pages 642 - 645
1 Jul 2024
Harris IA Sidhu VS MacDessi SJ Solomon M Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1235 - 1238
1 Dec 2023
Kader DF Jones S Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1199 - 1202
1 Nov 2024
Watts AC Tennent TD Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1033 - 1035
1 Oct 2024
Clement ND Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 6 | Pages 516 - 521
1 Jun 2024
Al-Hourani K Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1233 - 1234
1 Dec 2023
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1361 - 1362
1 Dec 2024
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1133 - 1134
1 Nov 2023
Haddad FS

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(11):1133–1134.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 13, Issue 1 | Pages 5 - 5
1 Feb 2024
Ollivere B


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 12, Issue 5 | Pages 311 - 312
5 May 2023
Xu C Liu Y

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(5):311–312.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 2 | Pages 99 - 100
1 Feb 2023
Birch NC Tsirikos AI


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 2 | Pages 111 - 113
1 Feb 2024
Howard A Thomas GER Perry DC


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 3 | Pages 224 - 226
1 Mar 2024
Ferguson D Perry DC


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1036 - 1038
1 Oct 2024
Tennent TD Watts AC Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 8 | Pages 760 - 763
1 Aug 2024
Mancino F Fontalis A Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 3 | Pages 220 - 223
1 Mar 2024
Kayani B Luo TD Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 104-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1281 - 1283
1 Dec 2022
Azizpour K Birch NC Peul WC


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 104-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1102 - 1103
1 Oct 2022
Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 11, Issue 6 | Pages 409 - 412
22 Jun 2022
Tsang SJ Ferreira N Simpson AHRW


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 104-B, Issue 7 | Pages 765 - 766
1 Jul 2022
Haddad FS Malchau H


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 11, Issue 4 | Pages 210 - 213
1 Apr 2022
Fontalis A Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 11, Issue 1 | Pages 6 - 7
3 Jan 2022
Walter N Rupp M Baertl S Alt V


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 104-B, Issue 1 | Pages 3 - 5
1 Jan 2022
Rajasekaran RB Ashford R Stevenson JD Pollock R Rankin KS Patton JT Gupta S Cosker TDA


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1642 - 1645
1 Nov 2021
Kayani B Giebaly D Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 10, Issue 9 | Pages 571 - 573
2 Sep 2021
Beverly MC Murray DW


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 7 | Pages 1174 - 1175
1 Jul 2021
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 6 Supple A | Pages 1 - 2
1 Jun 2021
Springer BD Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 10, Issue 6 | Pages 348 - 350
1 Jun 2021
Skinner JA Sabah SA Hart AJ



Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 10, Issue 3 | Pages 188 - 191
1 Mar 2021
Nicholson T Scott A Newton Ede M Jones SW


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 4 | Pages 597 - 599
1 Apr 2021
Kader DF Oussedik S Kader N Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 3 | Pages 421 - 422
1 Mar 2021
Perry DC Porter DW Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1597 - 1598
1 Dec 2020
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1431 - 1434
1 Nov 2020
Trompeter AJ Furness H Kanakaris NK Costa ML


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1111 - 1112
14 Sep 2020
Perry DC Costa M


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1274 - 1276
3 Oct 2020
Tsang SJ Eyre DW Atkins BL Simpson AHRW


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 6 | Pages 658 - 660
1 Jun 2020
Judge A Metcalfe D Whitehouse MR Parsons N Costa M


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 4 | Pages 401 - 402
1 Apr 2020
Chang JS Haddad FS


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 9, Issue 2 | Pages 1 - 2
1 Apr 2020
Ollivere B


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 3 | Pages 273 - 275
1 Mar 2020
Ahmed SS Haddad FS


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 6 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Dec 2019
Ollivere B


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1465 - 1465
1 Dec 2019
Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 8, Issue 12 | Pages 604 - 607
1 Dec 2019
Konan S Abdel MP Haddad FS

There is continued debate as to whether cemented or cementless implants should be utilized in particular cases based upon chronological age. This debate has been rekindled in the UK and other countries by directives mandating certain forms of acetabular and femoral component fixation based exclusively on the chronological age of the patient. This editorial focuses on the literature-based arguments to support the use of cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA), while addressing potential concerns surrounding safety and cost-effectiveness.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res. 2019;8(12):604–607.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1179 - 1183
1 Oct 2019
Parsons N Carey-Smith R Dritsaki M Griffin X Metcalfe D Perry D Stengel D Costa M


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1321 - 1324
1 Nov 2019
Kerr S Warwick D Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1466 - 1468
1 Dec 2019
Ramasamy A Humphrey J Robinson AHN


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 8, Issue 11 | Pages 570 - 572
1 Nov 2019
Ahmed SS Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 8, Issue 10 | Pages 469 - 471
1 Oct 2019
Evans CH


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 4 | Pages 1 - 3
1 Aug 2019
Buckley R


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 7 | Pages 753 - 754
1 Jul 2019
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 6_Supple_B | Pages 1 - 1
1 Jun 2019
Haddad FS Bostrom MPG


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 8, Issue 6 | Pages 253 - 254
1 Jun 2019
de Steiger R


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 3 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Jun 2019
Bollen S


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 8, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 2
1 Jan 2019
Clauss M Breusch SJ


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1533 - 1534
1 Dec 2018
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1261 - 1261
1 Oct 2018
Bhandari M Peterson D


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1133 - 1135
1 Sep 2018
Pairon P Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1407 - 1408
1 Nov 2018
Simpson AHRW Frost H Norrie J


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 7, Issue 8 | Pages 508 - 510
1 Aug 2018
Horriat S Haddad FS


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1133 - 1134
1 Sep 2007
Haddad FS Ashby E Konangamparambath S

Due to economic constraints, it has been suggested that joint replacement patients can be followed up in primary care. There are clinical, ethical and academic reasons why we must ensure that our joint replacements are appropriately clinically and radiologically followed up to minimise complications. This Editorial discusses this


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 7 | Pages 829 - 830
1 Jul 2018
Callaghan JJ Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 5 | Pages 557 - 558
1 May 2018
Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 6, Issue 10 | Pages 600 - 601
1 Oct 2017
Ghert M


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 7, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 2
1 Feb 2018
Bircher M


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 7 | Pages 849 - 850
1 Jul 2017
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 3 | Pages 291 - 294
1 Mar 2017
Javaid MK Handley R Costa ML


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1569 - 1570
1 Dec 2016
Haddad FS


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 5, Issue 5 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Oct 2016
Ollivere B


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 5, Issue 9 | Pages 442 - 443
1 Sep 2016
Donell ST


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 6 | Pages 721 - 722
1 Jun 2016
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 2 | Pages 147 - 151
1 Feb 2016
Haddad FS McLawhorn AS

Health economic evaluations potentially provide valuable information to clinicians, health care administrators, and policy makers regarding the financial implications of decisions about the care of patients. The highest quality research should be used to inform decisions that have direct impact on the access to care and the outcome of treatment. However, economic analyses are often complex and use research methods which are relatively unfamiliar to clinicians. Furthermore, health economic data have substantial national, regional, and institutional variability, which can limit the external validity of the results of a study. Therefore, minimum guidelines that aim to standardise the quality and transparency of reporting health economic research have been developed, and instruments are available to assist in the assessment of its quality and the interpretation of results.

The purpose of this editorial is to discuss the principal types of health economic studies, to review the most common instruments for judging the quality of these studies and to describe current reporting guidelines. Recommendations for the submission of these types of studies to The Bone & Joint Journal are provided.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:147–51.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 3 | Pages 289 - 290
1 Mar 2016
Haddad FS George DA


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 2
1 Jan 2016
Haddad FS Manktelow ARJ Skinner JA


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 7 | Pages 871 - 874
1 Jul 2015
Breakwell LM Cole AA Birch N Heywood C

The effective capture of outcome measures in the healthcare setting can be traced back to Florence Nightingale’s investigation of the in-patient mortality of soldiers wounded in the Crimean war in the 1850s.

Only relatively recently has the formalised collection of outcomes data into Registries been recognised as valuable in itself.

With the advent of surgeon league tables and a move towards value based health care, individuals are being driven to collect, store and interpret data.

Following the success of the National Joint Registry, the British Association of Spine Surgeons instituted the British Spine Registry. Since its launch in 2012, over 650 users representing the whole surgical team have registered and during this time, more than 27 000 patients have been entered onto the database.

There has been significant publicity regarding the collection of outcome measures after surgery, including patient-reported scores. Over 12 000 forms have been directly entered by patients themselves, with many more entered by the surgical teams.

Questions abound: who should have access to the data produced by the Registry and how should they use it? How should the results be reported and in what forum?

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:871–4.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1013 - 1014
1 Aug 2015
Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 4, Issue 8 | Pages 134 - 136
1 Aug 2015
Ghert M


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1575 - 1577
1 Dec 2014
Perry DC Parsons N Costa ML

The extent and depth of routine health care data are growing at an ever-increasing rate, forming huge repositories of information. These repositories can answer a vast array of questions. However, an understanding of the purpose of the dataset used and the quality of the data collected are paramount to determine the reliability of the result obtained.

This Editorial describes the importance of adherence to sound methodological principles in the reporting and publication of research using ‘big’ data, with a suggested reporting framework for future Bone & Joint Journal submissions.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:1575–7.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 8 | Pages 997 - 999
1 Aug 2014
Stahel PF Mauffrey C

We explore the limitations of complete reliance on evidence-based medicine which can be diminished by confounding issues and sampling bias. Other strategies which may be reasonably invoked are discussed.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:997–9.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 5 | Pages 567 - 568
1 May 2014
K. Graham H Narayanan UG


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 4 | Pages 433 - 435
1 Apr 2014
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1443 - 1444
1 Nov 2013
Griffin XL Parsons N Carey Smith R Stengel D Costa ML

The importance for observing the intention-to-treat approach in clinical studies is explained.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1443–4.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1156 - 1157
1 Sep 2013
Perry DC Parsons N Costa ML

The variation in surgical performance, both between centres and individual surgeons, has recently been of significant political, media and public interest. Within the United Kingdom, a government agenda to increase accountability amongst surgeons has led to the online publication of ‘surgeon-level’ data. Surgeons, journalists and the public need to understand these data if they are to be useful in driving up standards of surgical care. This Editorial describes the use of Funnel Plots, which are the common means by which such data are presented, and discusses how the plots are generated.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:1156–7.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 94-B, Issue 3 | Pages 289 - 289
1 Mar 2012
Scott J


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 1, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Feb 2012
Villar RN


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 8 | Pages 993 - 994
1 Aug 2007
Graham HK Harvey A

In cerebral palsy, the site and severity of the brain lesion are directly linked to gross motor function and the development of musculoskeletal deformities. The relationship between walking ability and orthopaedic surgery in children with cerebral palsy is not fully understood. The development of new tools such as the Functional Assessment Questionnaire and the Functional Mobility Scale can be used to give new insights on the functional impact of multilevel surgery. These scales are most useful as part of systematic, long-term follow-up.