With greater numbers of younger patients undergoing
total hip replacement (THR), the effect of patient age on the diameter
of the femoral canal may become more relevant. This study aimed
to investigate the relationship between the diameter of the diaphysis
of the femoral canal with increasing age in a large number of patients
who underwent THR. A total of 1685 patients scheduled for THR had
their femoral dimensions recorded from calibrated radiographs. There
were 736 males and 949 females with mean ages of 67.1 years (34
to 92) and 70.2 years (29 to 92), respectively. The mean diameter
of the femoral canal was 13.3 mm (8.0 to 23.0) for males and 12.7
mm (6.0 to 26.0) for females. There was a poor correlation between
age and the diameter of the canal in males (r = 0.071, p = 0.05)
but a stronger correlation in females (r = 0.31, p <
0.001). The diameter of the
When performing revision total hip arthroplasty using diaphyseal-engaging titanium tapered stems (TTS), the recommended 3 to 4 cm of stem-cortical diaphyseal contact may not be available. In challenging cases such as these with only 2 cm of contact, can sufficient axial stability be achieved and what is the benefit of a prophylactic cable? This study sought to determine, first, whether a prophylactic cable allows for sufficient axial stability when the contact length is 2 cm, and second, if differing TTS taper angles (2° vs 3.5°) impact these results. A biomechanical matched-pair cadaveric study was designed using six matched pairs of human fresh cadaveric femora prepared so that 2 cm of diaphyseal bone engaged with 2° (right femora) or 3.5° (left femora) TTS. Before impaction, three matched pairs received a single 100 lb-tensioned prophylactic beaded cable; the remaining three matched pairs received no cable adjuncts. Specimens underwent stepwise axial loading to 2600 N or until failure, defined as stem subsidence > 5 mm.Aims
Methods
Femoral revision component subsidence has been identified as predicting early failure in revision hip surgery. This comparative cohort study assessed the potential risk factors of subsidence in two commonly used femoral implant designs. A comparative cohort study was undertaken, analyzing a consecutive series of patients following revision total hip arthroplasties using either a tapered-modular (TM) fluted titanium or a porous-coated cylindrical modular (PCM) titanium femoral component, between April 2006 and May 2018. Clinical and radiological assessment was compared for both treatment cohorts. Risk factors for subsidence were assessed and compared.Aims
Methods
The use of short stems has become more popular
with the increased interest in less invasive approaches for total hip
arthroplasty. The curved broaches and stem can be inserted along
a curved track to avoid the abductor attachments. Short stems have
the potential of being more bone conserving by allowing for higher
neck retention, maintenance of the medial greater trochanter, and
preferential stress transfer to the proximal femur. An initial experience with 500 new short stems (Fitmore, Zimmer
Orthopedics) stems used for total hip arthroplasty is reported.
No stems have been revised for aseptic loosening.
