Six pairs of human cadaver femora were divided equally into two groups one of which received a non-cemented reference implant and the other a very short non-dependent experimental implant. Thirteen strain-gauge rosettes were attached to the external surface of each specimen and, during application of combined axial and torsional loads to the femoral head, the strains in both groups were measured.

After the insertion of a non-cemented femoral component, the normal pattern of a progressive proximal-to-distal increase in strains was similar to that in the intact femur and the strain was maximum near the tip of the prosthesis. On the medial and lateral aspects of the proximal femur, the strains were greatly reduced after implantation of both types of implant. The pattern and magnitude of the strains, however, were closer to those in the intact femur after insertion of the experimental stem than in the reference stem. On the anterior and posterior aspects of the femur, implantation of both types of stem led to increased principal strains E1, E2 and E3. This was most pronounced for the experimental stem.

Our findings suggest that the experimental stem, which has a more anatomical proximal fit without having a distal stem and cortex contact, can provide immediate postoperative stability. Pure proximal loading by the experimental stem in the metaphysis, reduction of excessive bending stiffness of the stem by tapering and the absence of contact between the stem and the distal cortex may reduce stress shielding, bone resorption and thigh pain.

Hydroxyapatite-coated standard anatomical and customised femoral stems are designed to transmit load to the metaphyseal part of the proximal femur in order to avoid stress shielding and to reduce resorption of bone. In a randomised in vitro study, we compared the changes in the pattern of cortical strain after the insertion of hydroxyapatite-coated standard anatomical and customised stems in 12 pairs of human cadaver femora. A hip simulator reproduced the physiological loads on the proximal femur in single-leg stance and stair-climbing. The cortical strains were measured before and after the insertion of the stems.

Significantly higher strain shielding was seen in Gruen zones 7, 6, 5, 3 and 2 after the insertion of the anatomical stem compared with the customised stem. For the anatomical stem, the hoop strains on the femur also indicated that the load was transferred to the cortical bone at the lower metaphyseal or upper diaphyseal part of the proximal femur.

The customised stem induced a strain pattern more similar to that of the intact femur than the standard, anatomical stem.

We implanted titanium and carbon fibre-reinforced plastic (CFRP) femoral prostheses of the same dimensions into five prosthetic femora. An abductor jig was attached and a 1 kN load applied. This was repeated with five control femora. Digital image correlation was used to give a detailed two-dimensional strain map of the medial cortex of the proximal femur. Both implants caused stress shielding around the calcar. Distally, the titanium implant showed stress shielding, whereas the CFRP prosthesis did not produce a strain pattern which was statistically different from the controls. There was a reduction in strain beyond the tip of both the implants.

This investigation indicates that use of the CFRP stem should avoid stress shielding in total hip replacement.

Aims

Metaphyseal tritanium cones can be used to manage the tibial bone loss commonly encountered at revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). Tibial stems provide additional fixation and are generally used in combination with cones. The aim of this study was to examine the role of the stems in the overall stability of tibial implants when metaphyseal cones are used for rTKA.

A total of 20 pairs of fresh-frozen cadaver femurs were assigned to four alignment groups consisting of relative varus (10° and 20°) and relative valgus (10° and 20°), 75 composite femurs of two neck geometries were also used. In both the cadaver and the composite femurs, placing the component in 20° of valgus resulted in a significant increase in load to failure. Placing the component in 10° of valgus had no appreciable effect on increasing the load to failure except in the composite femurs with varus native femoral necks. Specimens in 10° of varus were significantly weaker than the neutrally-aligned specimens.

The results suggest that retention of the intact proximal femoral strength occurs at an implant angulation of ≥ 142°. However, the benefit of extreme valgus alignment may be outweighed in clinical practice by the risk of superior femoral neck notching, which was avoided in this study.