Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 50 of 101
Results per page:
Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 12, Issue 1 | Pages 3 - 4
1 Feb 2023
Ollivere B


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1133 - 1134
1 Sep 2007
Haddad FS Ashby E Konangamparambath S

Due to economic constraints, it has been suggested that joint replacement patients can be followed up in primary care. There are clinical, ethical and academic reasons why we must ensure that our joint replacements are appropriately clinically and radiologically followed up to minimise complications. This Editorial discusses this.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 13, Issue 6 | Pages 5 - 6
1 Dec 2024
Ollivere B


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 12, Issue 3 | Pages 3 - 3
1 Jun 2023
Ollivere B


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1361 - 1362
1 Dec 2024
Haddad FS


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 13, Issue 4 | Pages 5 - 6
2 Aug 2024
Ollivere B


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1133 - 1134
1 Nov 2023
Haddad FS

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(11):1133–1134.


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 5, Issue 9 | Pages 766 - 767
13 Sep 2024
Parker MJ


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 7 | Pages 640 - 641
1 Jul 2024
Ashby E Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 12, Issue 3 | Pages 199 - 201
7 Mar 2023
Brzeszczyńska J Brzeszczyński F

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(3):199–201.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 13, Issue 2 | Pages 5 - 6
1 Apr 2024
Ollivere B


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 5, Issue 9 | Pages 806 - 808
27 Sep 2024
Altorfer FCS Lebl DR


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 12, Issue 5 | Pages 306 - 308
1 May 2023
Sharrock M Board T

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(5):306–308.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 12, Issue 10 | Pages 654 - 656
16 Oct 2023
Makaram NS Simpson AHRW

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(10):654–656.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 6 | Pages 587 - 589
1 Jun 2023
Kunze KN Jang SJ Fullerton MA Vigdorchik JM Haddad FS

The OpenAI chatbot ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence (AI) application that uses state-of-the-art language processing AI. It can perform a vast number of tasks, from writing poetry and explaining complex quantum mechanics, to translating language and writing research articles with a human-like understanding and legitimacy. Since its initial release to the public in November 2022, ChatGPT has garnered considerable attention due to its ability to mimic the patterns of human language, and it has attracted billion-dollar investments from Microsoft and PricewaterhouseCoopers. The scope of ChatGPT and other large language models appears infinite, but there are several important limitations. This editorial provides an introduction to the basic functionality of ChatGPT and other large language models, their current applications and limitations, and the associated implications for clinical practice and research.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(6):587–589.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 12, Issue 4 | Pages 256 - 258
3 Apr 2023
Farrow L Evans J

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(4):256–258.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1033 - 1035
1 Oct 2024
Clement ND Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1203 - 1205
1 Nov 2024
Taylor LA Breslin MA Hendrickson SB Vallier HA Ollivere BJ


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 12, Issue 1 | Pages 5 - 8
1 Jan 2023
Im G

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(1):5–8.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 9 | Pages 884 - 886
1 Sep 2024
Brown R Bendall S Aronow M Ramasamy A


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1235 - 1238
1 Dec 2023
Kader DF Jones S Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 105-B, Issue 8 | Pages 833 - 836
1 Aug 2023
Mancino F Gant V Meek DRM Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 104-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1191 - 1192
1 Nov 2022
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 104-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1102 - 1103
1 Oct 2022
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 104-B, Issue 7 | Pages 765 - 766
1 Jul 2022
Haddad FS Malchau H


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 11, Issue 6 | Pages 342 - 345
1 Jun 2022
Hall AJ Clement ND MacLullich AMJ Simpson AHRW White TO Duckworth AD

Research into COVID-19 has been rapid in response to the dynamic global situation, which has resulted in heterogeneity of methodology and the communication of information. Adherence to reporting standards would improve the quality of evidence presented in future studies, and may ensure that findings could be interpreted in the context of the wider literature. The COVID-19 pandemic remains a dynamic situation, requiring continued assessment of the disease incidence and monitoring for the emergence of viral variants and their transmissibility, virulence, and susceptibility to vaccine-induced immunity. More work is needed to assess the long-term impact of COVID-19 infection on patients who sustain a hip fracture. The International Multicentre Project Auditing COVID-19 in Trauma & Orthopaedics (IMPACT) formed the largest multicentre collaborative audit conducted in orthopaedics in order to provide an emergency response to a global pandemic, but this was in the context of many vital established audit services being disrupted at an early stage, and it is crucial that these resources are protected during future health crises. Rapid data-sharing between regions should be developed, with wider adoption of the revised 2022 Fragility Fracture Network Minimum Common Data Set for Hip Fracture Audit, and a pragmatic approach to information governance processes in order to facilitate cooperation and meta-audit. This editorial aims to: 1) identify issues related to COVID-19 that require further research; 2) suggest reporting standards for studies of COVID-19 and other communicable diseases; 3) consider the requirement of new risk scores for hip fracture patients; and 4) present the lessons learned from IMPACT in order to inform future collaborative studies.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(6):342–345.


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 11, Issue 5 | Pages 301 - 303
17 May 2022
Clement ND Skinner JA Haddad FS Simpson AHRW


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 104-B, Issue 6 | Pages 645 - 646
1 Jun 2022
Haddad FS


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 11, Issue 1 | Pages 3 - 4
1 Feb 2022
Ollivere B


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1743 - 1744
1 Dec 2021
Haddad FS


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 10, Issue 5 | Pages 3 - 3
1 Oct 2021
Ollivere B


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 10, Issue 10 | Pages 690 - 692
1 Oct 2021
Hoellwarth JS Tetsworth K Akhtar MA Al Muderis M


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 10, Issue 9 | Pages 591 - 593
7 Sep 2021
Thompson JW Simpson AHRW Haddad FS


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 10, Issue 3 | Pages 3 - 3
1 Jun 2021
Ollivere B


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 10, Issue 6 | Pages 348 - 350
1 Jun 2021
Skinner JA Sabah SA Hart AJ


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 6 | Pages 1007 - 1008
1 Jun 2021
Johansen A Inman DS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1597 - 1598
1 Dec 2020
Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 10 | Pages 1277 - 1278
1 Oct 2020
Hughes R Hallstrom B Schemanske C Howard PW Wilton T


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 7 | Pages 853 - 854
1 Jul 2014
Parsons N Griffin XL Stengel D Carey Smith R Perry DC Costa ML

The Bone & Joint Journal provides the latest evidence to guide the clinical practice of orthopaedic surgeons. The benefits of one intervention compared with another are presented using outcome measures; some may be specific to a limb or joint and some are more general health-related quality of life measures. Readers will be familiar with many of these outcome measures and will be able to judge the relative benefits of different interventions when measured using the same outcome tool; for example, different treatments for pain in the knee measured using a particular knee score. But, how should readers compare outcomes between different clinical areas using different outcome measures? This article explores the use of standardised effect sizes. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:853–4


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 7 Supple B | Pages 1 - 2
1 Jul 2020
Della Valle CJ Jacobs JJ


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 3, Issue 2 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Apr 2014
Mauffrey C


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 9, Issue 4 | Pages 200 - 201
1 Apr 2020
Simpson AHRW Dall G Haas JG


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1466 - 1468
1 Dec 2019
Ramasamy A Humphrey J Robinson AHN


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 3, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Feb 2014
Ollivere BJ


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 2, Issue 6 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Dec 2013
Ollivere BJ


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 8, Issue 12 | Pages 604 - 607
1 Dec 2019
Konan S Abdel MP Haddad FS

There is continued debate as to whether cemented or cementless implants should be utilized in particular cases based upon chronological age. This debate has been rekindled in the UK and other countries by directives mandating certain forms of acetabular and femoral component fixation based exclusively on the chronological age of the patient. This editorial focuses on the literature-based arguments to support the use of cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA), while addressing potential concerns surrounding safety and cost-effectiveness.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res. 2019;8(12):604–607.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 4 | Pages 1 - 3
1 Aug 2019
Buckley R


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 8, Issue 6 | Pages 224 - 225
1 Jun 2019
Wilkinson JM


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 5 | Pages 500 - 501
1 May 2019
Wallace WA


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 2
1 Feb 2019
Ollivere B