Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 20 of 22
Results per page:
Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 13, Issue 5 | Pages 8 - 17
1 Oct 2024
Holley J Lawniczak D Machin JT Briggs TWR Hunter J


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 12, Issue 3 | Pages 8 - 9
1 Jun 2023
Stringer H


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 13, Issue 1 | Pages 7 - 8
1 Feb 2024
Jamal B Round J Qureshi A


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 13, Issue 2 | Pages 8 - 12
1 Apr 2024
Craxford S


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 13, Issue 6 | Pages 7 - 12
1 Dec 2024
Lawniczak D Holley JM Machin JT Hunter JB Briggs TWR Hutton M


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 11, Issue 3 | Pages 9 - 11
1 Jun 2022
Foxall-Smith M


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 11, Issue 2 | Pages 5 - 10
1 Apr 2022
Zheng A Rocos B


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 10, Issue 2 | Pages 5 - 16
1 Apr 2021
Coco V Shivji F Thompson P Grassi A Zaffagnini S Spalding T


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 1, Issue 3 | Pages 2 - 4
1 Jun 2012
Cobb JP Andrews BL

In a global environment of rising costs and limited funds, robotic and computer-assisted orthopaedic technologies could provide the means to drive a necessary revolution in arthroplasty productivity. Robots have been used to operate on humans for 20 years, but the adoption of the technology has lagged behind that of the manufacturing industry. The use of robots in surgery should enable cost savings by reducing instrumentation and inventories, and improving accuracy. Despite these benefits, the orthopaedic community has been resistant to change. If the ergonomics and economics are right, robotic technology just might transform the provision of joint replacement


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 9, Issue 6 | Pages 5 - 11
1 Dec 2020
Sharma V Turmezei T Wain J McNamara I


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 3 | Pages 3 - 7
1 Jun 2019
Patel NG Waterson HB Phillips JRA Toms AD


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 4 | Pages 5 - 13
1 Aug 2019
Middleton R Khan T Alvand A


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 7, Issue 4 | Pages 3 - 8
1 Aug 2018
White TO Carter TH


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 4 | Pages 2 - 7
1 Aug 2017
Titchener AG Tambe AA Clark DI


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 4, Issue 5 | Pages 2 - 7
1 Oct 2015
Clark GW Wood DJ

The use of robotics in arthroplasty surgery is expanding rapidly as improvements in the technology evolve. This article examines current evidence to justify the usage of robotics, as well as the future potential in this emerging field.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 5, Issue 4 | Pages 4 - 15
1 Aug 2016
Sehat K

Anatomical total knee arthroplasty alignment versus conventional mechanical alignment; or a combination?


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 5, Issue 2 | Pages 3 - 6
1 Apr 2016
Patel M Eastley N Ashford R

This paper aims to provide evidence-based guidance for the general orthopaedic surgeon faced with the presentation of a potential soft tissue sarcoma in an extremity.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 4, Issue 4 | Pages 2 - 7
1 Aug 2015
Nicol S Jackson M Monsell F

This review explores recent advances in fixator design and used in contemporary orthopaedic practice including the management of bone loss, complex deformity and severe isolated limb injury.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 4, Issue 1 | Pages 6 - 11
1 Feb 2015
Manktelow A Bloch B

This review examines the future of total hip arthroplasty, aiming to avoid past mistakes


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 3, Issue 3 | Pages 9 - 13
1 Jun 2014
Waterson HB Philips JRA Mandalia VI Toms AD

Mechanical alignment has been a fundamental tenet of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) since modern knee replacement surgery was developed in the 1970s. The objective of mechanical alignment was to infer the greatest biomechanical advantage to the implant to prevent early loosening and failure. Over the last 40 years a great deal of innovation in TKA technology has been focusing on how to more accurately achieve mechanical alignment. Recently the concept of mechanical alignment has been challenged, and other alignment philosophies are being explored with the intention of trying to improve patient outcomes following TKA.

This article examines the evolution of the mechanical alignment concept and whether there are any viable alternatives.