Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 20 of 25
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 2 | Pages 108 - 110
1 Feb 2024
Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 12, Issue 5 | Pages 311 - 312
5 May 2023
Xu C Liu Y

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(5):311–312.


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 5, Issue 12 | Pages 1120 - 1122
20 Dec 2024
Gill RHS Haddad FS

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2024;5(12):1120–1122.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 9 | Pages 879 - 883
1 Sep 2024
Kayani B Staats K Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 104-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1281 - 1283
1 Dec 2022
Azizpour K Birch NC Peul WC


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 7 Supple B | Pages 1 - 2
1 Jul 2021
Clohisy JC Haddad FS



The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 4 | Pages 403 - 406
1 Apr 2020
Trompeter A


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1431 - 1434
1 Nov 2020
Trompeter AJ Furness H Kanakaris NK Costa ML


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 8, Issue 12 | Pages 604 - 607
1 Dec 2019
Konan S Abdel MP Haddad FS

There is continued debate as to whether cemented or cementless implants should be utilized in particular cases based upon chronological age. This debate has been rekindled in the UK and other countries by directives mandating certain forms of acetabular and femoral component fixation based exclusively on the chronological age of the patient. This editorial focuses on the literature-based arguments to support the use of cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA), while addressing potential concerns surrounding safety and cost-effectiveness.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res. 2019;8(12):604–607.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 101-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1466 - 1468
1 Dec 2019
Ramasamy A Humphrey J Robinson AHN


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 4 | Pages 1 - 3
1 Aug 2019
Buckley R


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 7, Issue 8 | Pages 508 - 510
1 Aug 2018
Horriat S Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 7, Issue 1 | Pages 103 - 104
1 Jan 2018
Young PS Patil S Meek RMD


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 100-B, Issue 1 | Pages 1 - 3
1 Jan 2018
Skinner JA Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 9 | Pages 1121 - 1122
1 Sep 2017
Haddad FS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 5, Issue 10 | Pages 490 - 491
1 Oct 2016
Ghert M McKee M


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 3 | Pages 291 - 294
1 Mar 2017
Javaid MK Handley R Costa ML


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 2 | Pages 147 - 150
1 Feb 2017
Costa ML Tutton E Achten J Grant R Slowther AM

Traditionally, informed consent for clinical research involves the patient reading an approved Participant Information Sheet, considering the information presented and having as much time as they need to discuss the study information with their friends and relatives, their clinical care and the research teams. This system works well in the ‘planned’ or ‘elective’ setting. But what happens if the patient requires urgent treatment for an injury or emergency?

This article reviews the legal framework which governs informed consent in the emergency setting, discusses how the approach taken may vary according to the details of the emergency and the treatment required, and reports on the patients’ view of providing consent following a serious injury. We then provide some practical tips for managing the process of informed consent in the context of injuries and emergencies.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:147–150.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 4 | Pages 433 - 434
1 Apr 2016
Haddad FS