Aims. The aim of this study was to test the null hypothesis that there
is no difference, from the payer perspective, in the cost of treatment
of a distal radial fracture in an
To assess the proportion of patients with distal radius fractures (DRFs) who were managed nonoperatively during the COVID-19 pandemic in accordance with the British Orthopaedic Association BOAST COVID-19 guidelines, who would have otherwise been considered for an operative intervention. We retrospectively reviewed the radiographs and clinical notes of all patients with DRFs managed nonoperatively, following the publication of the BOAST COVID-19 guidelines on the management of urgent trauma between 26 March and 18 May 2020. Radiological parameters including radial height, radial inclination, intra-articular step-off, and volar tilt from post-reduction or post-application of cast radiographs were measured. The assumption was that if one radiological parameter exceeds the acceptable criteria, the patient would have been considered for an operative intervention in pre-COVID times.Aims
Methods
Arthritis of the wrist is a painful disabling
condition that has various causes and presentations. The traditional treatment
has been a total wrist fusion at a price of the elimination of movement.
However, forms of treatment which allow the preservation of movement
are now preferred. Modern arthroplasties of the wrist are still
not sufficiently robust to meet the demands of many patients, nor
do they restore normal kinematics of the wrist. A preferable compromise
may be selective excision and partial fusion of the wrist using
knowledge of the aetiology and pattern of degenerative change to
identify which joints can be sacrificed and which can be preserved. This article provides an overview of the treatment options available
for patients with arthritis of the wrist and an algorithm for selecting
an appropriate surgical strategy. Cite this article:
There is no consensus on the benefit of arthroscopically
assisted reduction of the articular surface combined with fixation
using a volar locking plate for the treatment of intra-articular
distal radial fractures. In this study we compared the functional
and radiographic outcomes of fluoroscopically and arthroscopically
guided reduction of these fractures. Between February 2009 and May 2013, 74 patients with unilateral
unstable intra-articular distal radial fractures were randomised
equally into the two groups for treatment. The mean age of these
74 patients was 64 years (24 to 92). We compared functional outcomes
including active range of movement of the wrist, grip strength and Disabilities
of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores at six and 48 weeks; and radiographic
outcomes that included gap, step, radial inclination, volar angulation
and ulnar variance. There were no significant differences between the techniques
with regard to functional outcomes or radiographic parameters. The
mean gap and step in the fluoroscopic and arthroscopic groups were
comparable at 0.9 mm (standard deviation Arthroscopic reduction conferred no advantage over conventional
fluoroscopic guidance in achieving anatomical reduction of intra-articular
distal radial fractures when using a volar locking plate. Cite this article:
This article is a systematic review of the published
literature about the biomechanics, functional outcome and complications
of intramedullary nailing of fractures of the distal radius. We searched the Medline and EMBASE databases and included all
studies which reported the outcome of intramedullary (IM) nailing
of fractures of the distal radius. Data about functional outcome,
range of movement (ROM), strength and complications, were extracted.
The studies included were appraised independently by both authors
using a validated quality assessment scale for non-controlled studies
and the CONSORT statement for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The search strategy revealed 785 studies, of which 16 were included
for full paper review. These included three biomechanical studies,
eight case series and five randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The biomechanical studies concluded that IM nails were at least
as strong as locking plates. The clinical studies reported that
IM nailing gave a comparable ROM, functional outcome and grip strength
to other fixation techniques. However, the mean complication rate of intramedullary nailing
was 17.6% (0% to 50%). This is higher than the rates reported in
contemporary studies for volar plating. It raises concerns about
the role of intramedullary nailing, particularly when comparative
studies have failed to show that it has any major advantage over
other techniques. Further adequately powered RCTs comparing the
technique to both volar plating and percutaneous wire fixation are needed. Cite this article:
We conducted an anatomical study to determine
the best technique for transfer of the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN)
for the treatment of proximal ulnar nerve injuries. The AIN, ulnar
nerve, and associated branches were dissected in 24 cadaver arms.
The number of branches of the AIN and length available for transfer
were measured. The nerve was divided just proximal to its termination
in pronator quadratus and transferred to the ulnar nerve through
the shortest available route. Separation of the deep and superficial
branches of the ulnar nerve by blunt dissection alone, was also
assessed. The mean number of AIN branches was 4.8 (3 to 8) and the
mean length of the nerve available for transfer was 72 mm (41 to
106). The transferred nerve reached the ulnar nerve most distally
when placed dorsal to flexor digitorum profundus (FDP). We therefore
conclude that the AIN should be passed dorsal to FDP, and that the
deep and superficial branches of the ulnar nerve require approximately
30 mm of blunt dissection and 20 mm of sharp dissection from the
point of bifurcation to the site of the anastomosis. The use of this technique for transfer of the AIN should improve
the outcome for patients with proximal ulnar nerve injuries. Cite this article:
