Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 9 of 9
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 103-B, Issue 6 | Pages 1007 - 1008
1 Jun 2021
Johansen A Inman DS


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 12, Issue 4 | Pages 256 - 258
3 Apr 2023
Farrow L Evans J

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2023;12(4):256–258.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 13, Issue 6 | Pages 5 - 6
1 Dec 2024
Ollivere B


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 11 | Pages 1199 - 1202
1 Nov 2024
Watts AC Tennent TD Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 3 | Pages 220 - 223
1 Mar 2024
Kayani B Luo TD Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 106-B, Issue 9 | Pages 879 - 883
1 Sep 2024
Kayani B Staats K Haddad FS


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 99-B, Issue 2 | Pages 147 - 150
1 Feb 2017
Costa ML Tutton E Achten J Grant R Slowther AM

Traditionally, informed consent for clinical research involves the patient reading an approved Participant Information Sheet, considering the information presented and having as much time as they need to discuss the study information with their friends and relatives, their clinical care and the research teams. This system works well in the ‘planned’ or ‘elective’ setting. But what happens if the patient requires urgent treatment for an injury or emergency?

This article reviews the legal framework which governs informed consent in the emergency setting, discusses how the approach taken may vary according to the details of the emergency and the treatment required, and reports on the patients’ view of providing consent following a serious injury. We then provide some practical tips for managing the process of informed consent in the context of injuries and emergencies.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:147–150.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 95-B, Issue 2 | Pages 145 - 145
1 Feb 2013
Villar RN


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 89-B, Issue 7 | Pages 849 - 850
1 Jul 2007
Atkins RM

This editorial examines the influence of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) on the conduct of orthopaedic surgery. It proffers criticism and suggests ways of improvement.