Aims. The modern prevalence of primary tumours causing metastatic bone disease is ill-defined in the oncological literature. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to identify the prevalence of primary tumours in the setting of metastatic bone disease, as well as reported rates of
Opinion remains divided as to whether the development
of
Aims. The aim of this paper was to investigate the prognostic factors for local recurrence in patients with
Aims. The aim of this study was to validate the Mirels score in predicting
pathological fractures in metastatic disease of the lower limb. Patients and Methods. A total of 62 patients with confirmed metastatic disease met
the inclusion criteria. Of the 62 patients, 32 were female and 30
were male. The mean age of patients was 65 years (35 to 89). The
primary malignancy originated from the breast in 27 (44%) patients,
prostate in 15 (24%) patients, kidney in seven (11%), and lung in
four (6%) of patients. One patient (2%) had metastatic carcinoma
from the lacrimal gland, two patients (3%) had multiple myeloma,
one patient (2%) had lymphoma of bone, and five patients (8%) had
metastatic carcinoma of unknown primary. Plain radiographs at the
time of initial presentation were scored using Mirels system by
the four authors. The radiographic components of the score (anatomical
site, size, and radiographic appearance) were scored two weeks apart.
Inter- and intraobserver reliability were calculated with Fleiss’
kappa test. Bland-Altman plots were created to compare the variances
of the individual components of the score and the total Mirels score. Results. Kappa values for the interobserver variability of the components
of the Mirels score were k = 0.554 (95% CI 0.483 to 0.626) for site,
k = 0.342 (95% CI 0.285 to 0.400) for size, k = 0.443 (95% CI 0.387
to 0.499) for radiographic appearance, and k = 0.294 (95% CI 0.258
to 0.331)for the total score. Kappa values for the intra-observer
reliability were k = 0.608 (95% CI 0.506 to 0.710) for site, k = 0.579
(95% CI 0.487 to 0.670) for size, k = 0.614 (95% CI 0.522 to 0.703)
for radiographic appearance, and k = 0.323 (95% CI 0.266 to 0.379)
for total score. Conclusion. Our study showed fair to moderate agreement between authors when
using the Mirels score, and moderate to substantial agreement when
authors rescored radiographs. The Mirels score is subjective and
lacks reproducibility in predicting the risk of
Aims. The aim of this study was to assess the current trends in the estimation of survival and the preferred forms of treatment of
We investigated whether the presence of a pathological
fracture increased the risk of local recurrence in patients with
a giant cell tumour (GCT) of bone. We also assessed if curettage
is still an appropriate form of treatment in the presence of a pathological
fracture. We conducted a comprehensive review and meta-analysis
of papers which reported outcomes in patients with a GCT with and
without a
Bone loss secondary to primary or metastatic lesions of the proximal humerus remains a challenging surgical problem. Options include preservation of the joint with stabilisation using internal fixation or resection of the tumour with prosthetic replacement. Resection of the proximal humerus often includes the greater tuberosity and adjacent diaphysis, which may result in poor function secondary to loss of the rotator cuff and/or deltoid function. Preservation of the joint with internal fixation may reduce the time in hospital and peri-operative morbidity compared with joint replacement, and result in a better functional outcome. We included 32 patients with
Aims. Due to their radiolucency and favourable mechanical properties, carbon fibre nails may be a preferable alternative to titanium nails for oncology patients. We aim to compare the surgical characteristics and short-term results of patients who underwent intramedullary fixation with either a titanium or carbon fibre nail for
Aims. This study aimed to compare the performance of survival prediction models for bone metastases of the extremities (BM-E) with
A number of risk factors based upon mostly retrospective surgical data, have been formulated in order to identify impending pathological fractures of the femur from low-risk metastases. We have followed up patients taking part in a randomised trial of radiotherapy, prospectively, in order to determine if these factors were effective in predicting fractures. In 102 patients with 110 femoral lesions, 14 fractures occurred during follow-up. The risk factors studied were increasing pain, the size of the lesion, radiographic appearance, localisation, transverse/axial/circumferential involvement of the cortex and the scoring system of Mirels. Only axial cortical involvement >
30 mm (p = 0.01), and circumferential cortical involvement >
50% (p = 0.03) were predictive of fracture. Mirels’ scoring system was insufficiently specific to predict a fracture (p = 0.36). Our results indicate that most conventional risk factors overestimate the actual occurrence of pathological fractures of the femur. The risk factor of axial cortical involvement provides a simple, objective tool in order to decide which treatment is appropriate.
The purpose of this study was to assess whether
the use of a joint-sparing technique such as curettage and grafting was
successful in eradicating giant cell tumours of the proximal femur,
or whether an alternative strategy was more appropriate. Between 1974 and 2012, 24 patients with a giant cell tumour of
the proximal femur were treated primarily at our hospital. Treatment
was either joint sparing or joint replacing. Joint-sparing treatment
was undertaken in ten patients by curettage with or without adjunctive
bone graft. Joint replacement was by total hip replacement in nine patients
and endoprosthetic replacement in five. All 11 patients who presented
with a
Surgery is often indicated in patients with metastatic bone disease (MBD) to improve pain and maximize function. Few studies are available which report on clinically meaningful outcomes such as quality of life, function, and pain relief after surgery for MBD. This is the published protocol for the Bone Metastasis Audit — Patient Reported Outcomes (BoMA-PRO) multicentre MBD study. The primary objective is to ascertain patient-reported quality of life at three to 24 months post-surgery for MBD. This will be a prospective, longitudinal study across six UK orthopaedic centres powered to identify the influence of ten patient variables on quality of life at three months after surgery for MBD. Adult patients managed for bone metastases will be screened by their treating consultant and posted out participant materials. If they opt in to participate, they will receive questionnaire packs at regular intervals from three to 24 months post-surgery and their electronic records will be screened until death or five years from recruitment. The primary outcome is quality of life as measured by the European Organisation for Research and the Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ) C30 questionnaire. The protocol has been approved by the Newcastle & North Tyneside 2 Research Ethics Committee (REC ref 19/NE/0303) and the study is funded by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow (RCPSG) and the Association for Cancer Surgery (BASO-ACS).Aims
Methods
The early mortality in patients with hip fractures from bony metastases is unknown. The objectives of this study were to quantify 30- and 90-day mortality in patients with proximal femoral metastases, and to create a mortality prediction tool based on biomarkers associated with early death. This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients referred to the orthopaedic department at a UK trauma centre with a proximal femoral metastasis (PFM) over a seven-year period (2010 to 2016). The study group were compared to a matched control group of non-metastatic hip fractures. Minimum follow-up was one year.Aims
Methods
This study aims to assess first, whether mutations in the epidermal
growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Kirsten rat sarcoma (kRAS) genes
are associated with overall survival (OS) in patients who present
with symptomatic bone metastases from non-small cell lung cancer
(NSCLC) and secondly, whether mutation status should be incorporated into
prognostic models that are used when deciding on the appropriate
palliative treatment for symptomatic bone metastases. We studied 139 patients with NSCLC treated between 2007 and 2014
for symptomatic bone metastases and whose mutation status was known.
The association between mutation status and overall survival was
analysed and the results applied to a recently published prognostic
model to determine whether including the mutation status would improve
its discriminatory power.Aims
Patients and Methods
Aims. The aim of the LightFix Trial was to evaluate the clinical outcomes for one year after the treatment of impending and completed
Aims. Intra-articular (IA) tumours around the knee are treated with extra-articular (EA) resection, which is associated with poor functional outcomes. We aim to evaluate the accuracy of MRI in predicting IA involvement around the knee. Methods. We identified 63 cases of high-grade sarcomas in or around the distal femur that underwent an EA resection from a prospectively maintained database (January 1996 to April 2020). Suspicion of IA disease was noted in 52 cases, six had IA
Aims. Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive lesion that is difficult to treat as salvaging the joint can be associated with a high rate of local recurrence (LR). We evaluated the risk factors for tumour relapse after treatment of a GCTB of the limbs. Methods. A total of 354 consecutive patients with a GCTB underwent joint salvage by curettage and reconstruction with bone graft and/or cement or en bloc resection. Patient, tumour, and treatment factors were analyzed for their impact on LR. Patients treated with denosumab were excluded. Results. There were 53 LRs (15%) at a mean 30.5 months (5 to 116). LR was higher after curettage (18.4%) than after resection (4.6%; p = 0.008). Neither
Aims. Accurate estimations of the risk of fracture due to metastatic bone disease in the femur is essential in order to avoid both under-treatment and over-treatment of patients with an impending