Periprosthetic hip-joint infection is a multifaceted and highly detrimental outcome for patients and clinicians. The incidence of prosthetic joint infection reported within two years of primary hip arthroplasty ranges from 0.8% to 2.1%. Costs of treatment are over five-times greater in people with periprosthetic hip joint infection than in those with no infection. Currently, there are no national evidence-based guidelines for treatment and management of this condition to guide clinical practice or to inform clinical study design. The aim of this study is to develop guidelines based on evidence from the six-year INFection and ORthopaedic Management (INFORM) research programme. We used a consensus process consisting of an evidence review to generate items for the guidelines and online consensus questionnaire and virtual face-to-face consensus meeting to draft the guidelines.Aims
Methods
The increasing infection burden after total hip arthroplasty (THA) has seen a rise in the use of two-stage exchange arthroplasty and the use of increasingly powerful antibiotics at the time of this procedure. As a result, there has been an increase in the number of failed two-stage revisions during the past decade. The aim of this study was to clarify the outcome of repeat two-stage revision THA following a failed two-stage exchange due to recurrent prosthetic joint infection (PJI). We identified 42 patients who underwent a two-stage revision THA having already undergone at least one previous two stage procedure for infection, between 2000 and 2015. There were 23 women and 19 men. Their mean age was 69.3 years (48 to 81). The outcome was analyzed at a minimum follow-up of two years.Aims
Patients and Methods
The optimal management of intracapsular fractures of the femoral
neck in independently mobile patients remains open to debate. Successful
fixation obviates the limitations of arthroplasty for this group
of patients. However, with fixation failure rates as high as 30%,
the outcome of revision surgery to salvage total hip arthroplasty
(THA) must be considered. We carried out a systematic review to
compare the outcomes of salvage THA and primary THA for intracapsular
fractures of the femoral neck. We performed a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews
and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) compliant systematic review, using the
PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane libraries databases. A meta-analysis
was performed where possible, and a narrative synthesis when a meta-analysis
was not possible.Aims
Patients and Methods
