Clinical, radiological, and Scoliosis Research
Society-22 questionnaire data were reviewed pre-operatively and
two years post-operatively for patients with thoracolumbar/lumbar
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by posterior spinal fusion
using a unilateral convex segmental pedicle screw technique. A total
of 72 patients were included (67 female, 5 male; mean age at surgery
16.7 years (13 to 23)) and divided into groups: group 1 included
53 patients who underwent fusion between the vertebrae at the limit
of the curve (proximal and distal end vertebrae); group 2 included
19 patients who underwent extension of the fusion distally beyond
the caudal end vertebra. A mean scoliosis correction of 80% (45% to 100%) was achieved.
The mean post-operative lowest instrumented vertebra angle, apical
vertebra translation and trunk shift were less than in previous
studies. A total of five pre-operative radiological parameters differed
significantly between the groups and correlated with the extension
of the fusion distally: the size of the thoracolumbar/lumbar curve,
the lowest instrumented vertebra angle, apical vertebra translation,
the Cobb angle on lumbar convex bending and the size of the compensatory
thoracic curve. Regression analysis allowed an equation incorporating
these parameters to be developed which had a positive predictive
value of 81% in determining whether the lowest instrumented vertebra
should be at the caudal end vertebra or one or two levels more distal.
There were no differences in the Scoliosis Research Society-22 outcome
scores between the two groups (p = 0.17). In conclusion, thoracolumbar/lumbar curves in patients with adolescent
idiopathic scoliosis may be effectively treated by posterior spinal
fusion using a unilateral segmental pedicle screw technique. Five
radiological parameters correlate with the need for distal extension
of the fusion, and an equation incorporating these parameters reliably
informs selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra. Cite this article:
To determine whether side-bending films in scoliosis are assessed for adequacy in clinical practice; and to introduce a novel method for doing so. Six surgeons and eight radiographers were invited to participate in four online surveys. The generic survey comprised erect and left and right bending radiographs of eight individuals with scoliosis, with an average age of 14.6 years. Respondents were asked to indicate whether each bending film was optimal (adequate) or suboptimal. In the first survey, they were also asked if they currently assessed the adequacy of bending films. A similar second survey was sent out two weeks later, using the same eight cases but in a different order. In the third survey, a guide for assessing bending film adequacy was attached along with the radiographs to introduce the novel T1-45B method, in which the upper endplate of T1 must tilt ≥ 45° from baseline for the study to be considered optimal. A fourth and final survey was subsequently conducted for confirmation.Aims
Methods
A combined anterior and posterior surgical approach
is generally recommended in the treatment of severe congenital kyphosis,
despite the fact that the anterior vascular supply of the spine
and viscera are at risk during exposure. The aim of this study was
to determine whether the surgical treatment of severe congenital thoracolumbar
kyphosis through a single posterior approach is feasible, safe and
effective. We reviewed the records of ten patients with a mean age of 11.1
years (5.4 to 14.1) who underwent surgery either by pedicle subtraction
osteotomy or by vertebral column resection with instrumented fusion
through a single posterior approach. The mean kyphotic deformity improved from 59.9° (45° to 110°)
pre-operatively to 17.5° (3° to 40°) at a mean follow-up of 47.0
months (29 to 85). Spinal cord monitoring was used in all patients
and there were no complications during surgery. These promising
results indicate the possible advantages of the described technique
over the established procedures. We believe that surgery should
be performed in case of documented progression and before structural
secondary curves develop. Our current strategy after documented
progression is to recommend surgery at the age of five years and
when 90% of the diameter of the spinal canal has already developed. Cite this article:
