In this study we randomised 140 patients who
were due to undergo primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to have the
procedure performed using either patient-specific cutting guides
(PSCG) or conventional instrumentation (CI). The primary outcome measure was the mechanical axis, as measured
at three months on a standing long-leg radiograph by the hip–knee–ankle
(HKA) angle. This was undertaken by an independent observer who
was blinded to the instrumentation. Secondary outcome measures were
component positioning, operating time, Knee Society and Oxford knee
scores, blood loss and length of hospital stay. A total of 126 patients (67 in the CI group and 59 in the PSCG
group) had complete clinical and radiological data. There were 88
females and 52 males with a mean age of 69.3 years (47 to 84) and
a mean BMI of 28.6 kg/m2 (20.2 to 40.8). The mean HKA
angle was 178.9° (172.5 to 183.4) in the CI group and 178.2° (172.4
to 183.4) in the PSCG group (p = 0.34). Outliers were identified
in 22 of 67 knees (32.8%) in the CI group and 19 of 59 knees (32.2%)
in the PSCG group (p = 0.99). There was no significant difference
in the clinical results (p = 0.95 and 0.59, respectively). Operating time,
blood loss and length of hospital stay were not significantly reduced
(p = 0.09, 0.58 and 0.50, respectively) when using PSCG. The use of PSCG in primary TKA did not reduce the proportion
of outliers as measured by post-operative coronal alignment. Cite this article:
Cartilage repair in terms of replacement, or
regeneration of damaged or diseased articular cartilage with functional tissue,
is the ‘holy grail’ of joint surgery. A wide spectrum of strategies
for cartilage repair currently exists and several of these techniques
have been reported to be associated with successful clinical outcomes
for appropriately selected indications. However, based on respective
advantages, disadvantages, and limitations, no single strategy, or
even combination of strategies, provides surgeons with viable options
for attaining successful long-term outcomes in the majority of patients.
As such, development of novel techniques and optimisation of current techniques
need to be, and are, the focus of a great deal of research from
the basic science level to clinical trials. Translational research
that bridges scientific discoveries to clinical application involves
the use of animal models in order to assess safety and efficacy
for regulatory approval for human use. This review article provides
an overview of animal models for cartilage repair. Cite this article:
After obtaining informed consent, 80 patients were randomised to undergo a navigated or conventional total knee replacement. All received a cemented, unconstrained, cruciate-retaining implant with a rotating platform. Full-length standing and lateral radiographs and CT scans of the hip, knee and ankle joint were carried out five to seven days after operation. No notable differences were found between computer-assisted navigation and conventional implantation techniques as regards the rotational alignment of the femoral or tibial components. Although the deviation from the transepicondylar axis was relatively low, there was a considerable range of deviation for the tibial rotational alignment. There was no statistically significant difference regarding the occurrence pattern of outliers in mechanical malalignment but the number of outliers was reduced in the navigated group.
We compared the performance of uncemented trabecular metal tibial components in total knee replacement with that of cemented tibial components in patients younger than 60 years over two years using radiostereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). A total of 22 consecutive patients (mean age 53 years, 33 to 59, 26 knees) received an uncemented NexGen trabecular metal cruciate-retaining monobloc tibial component and 19 (mean 53 years, 44 to 59, 21 knees) a cemented NexGen Option cruciate-retaining modular tibial component. All the trabecular metal components migrated during the initial three months and then stabilised. The exception was external rotation, which did not stabilise until 12 months. Unlike conventional metal-backed implants which displayed a tilting migration comprising subsidence and lift-off from the tibial tray, most of the trabecular metal components showed subsidence only, probably due to the elasticity of the implant. This pattern of subsidence is regarded as being beneficial for uncemented fixation.
