We studied prospectively 30 patients who had a Mitchell’s osteotomy secured by either a suture followed by immobilisation in a plaster boot for six weeks, or by a cortical screw with early mobilisation. The mean time for return to social activities after fixation by a screw was 2.9 weeks and to work 4.9 weeks, which was significantly earlier than those who had stabilisation by a suture (5.7 and 8.7 weeks, respectively; p <
0.001). Use of a screw also produced a higher degree of patient satisfaction at six weeks, and an earlier return to wearing normal footwear. The improvement in forefoot scores was significantly greater after fixation by a screw at six weeks (p = 0.036) and three months (p = 0.024). At one year, two screws had been removed because of pain at the site of the screw head. Internal fixation of Mitchell’s osteotomy by a screw allows the safe early mobilisation of patients and reduces the time required for convalescence.
Lisfranc injuries were previously described as fracture-dislocations of the tarsometatarsal joints. With advancements in modern imaging, subtle Lisfranc injuries are now more frequently recognized, revealing that their true incidence is much higher than previously thought. Injury patterns can vary widely in severity and anatomy. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential to achieve good outcomes. The original classification systems were anatomy-based, and limited as tools for guiding treatment. The current review, using the best available evidence, instead introduces a stability-based classification system, with weightbearing radiographs and CT serving as key diagnostic tools. Stable injuries generally have good outcomes with nonoperative management, most reliably treated with immobilization and non-weightbearing for six weeks. Displaced or comminuted injuries require surgical intervention, with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) being the most common approach, with a consensus towards bridge plating. While ORIF generally achieves satisfactory results, its effectiveness can vary, particularly in high-energy injuries. Primary arthrodesis remains niche for the treatment of acute injuries, but may offer benefits such as lower rates of post-traumatic arthritis and hardware removal. Novel fixation techniques, including suture button fixation, aim to provide flexible stabilization, which theoretically could improve midfoot biomechanics and reduce complications. Early findings suggest promising functional outcomes, but further studies are required to validate this method compared with established techniques. Future research should focus on refining stability-based classification systems, validation of weightbearing CT, improving rehabilitation protocols, and optimizing surgical techniques for various injury patterns to ultimately enhance patient outcomes. Cite this article:
The traditional transosseus flexor hallucis longus (FHL) tendon
transfer for patients with Achilles tendinopathy requires two incisions
to harvest a long tendon graft. The use of a bio-tenodesis screw
enables a short graft to be used and is less invasive, but lacks
supporting evidence about its biomechanical behaviour. We aimed,
in this study, to compare the strength of the traditional transosseus
tendon-to-tendon fixation with tendon-to-bone fixation using a tenodesis
screw, in cyclical loading and ultimate load testing. Tendon grafts were undertaken in 24 paired lower-leg specimens
and randomly assigned in two groups using fixation with a transosseus
suture (suture group) or a tenodesis screw (screw group). The biomechanical
behaviour was evaluated using cyclical and ultimate loading tests.
The Student’s Aims
Materials and Methods