The aim of this study was to compare the functional and radiological
outcomes in patients with a displaced fracture of the hip who were
treated with a cemented or a cementless femoral stem. A four-year follow-up of a randomized controlled study included
141 patients who underwent surgery for a displaced femoral neck
fracture. Patients were randomized to receive either a cemented
(n = 67) or a cementless (n = 74) stem at hemiarthroplasty (HA;
n = 83) or total hip arthroplasty (THA; n = 58).Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this randomised controlled study was
to compare functional and radiological outcomes between modern cemented
and uncemented hydroxyapatite coated stems after one year in patients
treated surgically for a fracture of the femoral neck. A total of
141 patients aged >
65 years were included. Patients were randomised
to be treated with a cemented Exeter stem or an uncemented Bimetric
stem. The patients were reviewed at four and 12 months. The cemented group performed better than the uncemented group
for the Harris hip score (78 In conclusion, our data do not support the use of an uncemented
hydroxyapatite coated stem for the treatment of displaced fractures
of the femoral neck in the elderly. Cite this article:
