We report the preliminary findings of the use of roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis to evaluate the early migration of five femoral components after revision for mechanical loosening using impacted cancellous allograft and cement. All hips were examined at one week, four to six months and one year after surgery. All the components subsided by 0.4 to 4.9 mm during the first year. In four hips the prosthetic head was displaced 1.1 to 6.9 mm posteriorly. Fixation of the femoral components was less secure than after primary arthroplasty but the incidence and magnitude of early migration were similar to those after revision with cement alone.

From 1970 to 1980 cemented metal-on-plastic total hip replacement was performed on 799 hips with primary osteoarthritis using one surgical technique. At the 10- to 20-year follow-up there had been 97 revisions for mechanical loosening. Univariate survivorship analysis showed that an increased risk of revision was associated with male gender, young age at primary THR, the Brunswik and Lubinus snap-fit prostheses with large femoral heads (as compared with the Charnley prosthesis), and varying experience of the surgeon. Multivariate statistical analysis showed a three-fold increased risk of revision for men (p < 0.0001), an increase in relative risk of 1.8 per 10 years younger at surgery (p < 0.0001), a fivefold increase in risk for the Brunswik prosthesis (p < 0.0001) and a twofold increase for the Lubinus prosthesis (p = 0.0067). Inexperience of the surgeon, however, was not validated as a risk factor. The study shows that the true risk factors for revision can be identified accurately by combining univariate survivorship and multivariate statistical analyses.

Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis was used to measure the migration of 24 cemented femoral components implanted during revision for mechanical loosening. All hips were examined one week, four months and one year after surgery; 14 hips were also examined after two years. Twenty-one components subsided 0.2 to 5.5 mm during the observation period; in 17 of these, subsidence occurred within four months of surgery. In 16 hips the prosthetic head was displaced 0.7 to 11.2 mm posteriorly. The fixation of the femoral components was less secure than after primary arthroplasty, especially in cases of femoral canal enlargement, when a standard-sized rather than a thick-stemmed prosthesis had been used, and in cases of inadequate cement filling.

We studied the rate of revision in 84 consecutive total hip replacements performed for failed osteosynthesis of femoral neck fractures and compared it with that for primary arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. The age and sex adjusted risk of prosthetic failure was 2.5 times higher after failure of fixation, but all the excess risk was in patients over 70 years of age. There were radiographic signs of loosening of the femoral component at five to 12 years after secondary arthroplasty in six of 33 survivors. In general, the results of secondary replacement were no worse than those obtained after primary arthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. We consider that internal fixation should be the primary procedure: total hip replacement is a safe secondary procedure when osteosynthesis fails.