Aims

The Ponseti method is an effective evidence-based treatment for clubfoot. It uses gentle manipulation to adjust the position of the foot in serial treatments towards a more physiological position. Casting is used to hold the newly achieved position. At first, the foot resists the new position imposed by the plaster cast, pressing against the cast, but over time the tissues are expected to adapt to the new position and the force decreases. The aim of this study was to test this hypothesis by measuring the forces between a clubfoot and the cast during treatment with the Ponseti method.

In a prospective, randomised controlled trial, 68 children who had a completely displaced metaphyseal fracture of the distal radius were treated either by manipulation (MUA) and application of an above-elbow cast alone or by the additional insertion of a percutaneous Kirschner (K-) wire. Full radiological follow-up to union was obtained in 65 children and 56 returned for clinical evaluation three months after injury.

Maintenance of reduction was significantly better in the K-wire group and fewer follow-up radiographs were required. There was no significant difference in the clinical outcome measured three months after injury. Seven of 33 patients in the MUA group had to undergo a second procedure because of an unacceptable position compared with none of the 35 in the K-wire group (chi-squared test, p < 0.01). One patient in the K-wire group required exploration for recovery of a migrated wire.

We conclude that the use of a percutaneous K-wire to augment the reduction of the fracture in children who have a completely displaced metaphyseal fracture of the distal radius is a safe and reliable way of maintaining alignment of the fracture.

We tested the hypothesis that children who sustain a supracondylar fracture have a greater range of elbow hyperextension than those with a fracture of the distal radius.

Three observers made 358 measurements in 183 children (114 boys and 69 girls). There were 119 fractures of the distal radius and 64 supracondylar fractures.

Initially, the group with a supracondylar fracture appeared to have extension 1.7° greater than that of the group with fracture of the distal radius. On average, there was a maximum variation of 3° between observers. After allowing for age, gender and observer, there was no significant difference between the groups. Our study had greater than 80% power to detect a difference in hyperextension of 2° at the 5% level with the above observer variability.

When age and gender are taken into account, any variation in the amount of hyperextension at the elbow is not sufficient to explain the occurrence of a supracondylar fracture.