Aims

The purpose of this study was to determine whether there were long-term differences in outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) undertaken for acute proximal humeral fracture versus rotator cuff deficiency with a minimum follow-up of five years.

The purpose of this study was to review the long-term outcomes of a previously reported prospective series of 46 type III acromioclavicular dislocations. These were treated surgically with temporary fixation of the acromioclavicular joint with wires, repair of the acromioclavicular ligaments, and overlapped suture of the deltoid and trapezius muscles. Of the 46 patients, one had died, four could not be traced, and three declined to return for follow-up, leaving 38 patients in the study. There were 36 men and two women, with a mean age at follow-up of 57.3 years (41 to 71). The mean follow-up was 24.2 years (21 to 26).

Patients were evaluated using the Imatani and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) scoring systems. Their subjective status was assessed using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and Simple Shoulder Test questionnaires, and a visual analogue scale for patient satisfaction. The examination included radiographs of the shoulder.

At a follow-up of 21 years, the results were satisfactory in 35 (92.1%) patients and unsatisfactory in three (7.9%). In total, 35 patients (92.1%) reported no pain, one slight pain, and two moderate pain. All except two patients had a full range of shoulder movement compared with the opposite side. Unsatisfactory results were the result of early redisplacement in two patients, and osteoarthritis without redisplacement in one. According to the Imatani and UCLA scores, there was no difference between the operated shoulder and the opposite shoulder (p > 0.05). Given the same situation, 35 (92.1%) patients would opt for the same surgical treatment again.

Operative treatment of type III acromioclavicular joint injuries produces satisfactory long-term results.

We report a prospective study, using multivariate analysis, of the factors which influence the range of movement after total knee arthroplasty in 74 patients with 83 arthroplasties at a mean follow-up of 23.6 months (12 to 41). All the patients had a diagnosis of osteoarthritis, a severely disabled knee with a Knee Society system score of less than 60, varus deformity, no previous surgery to the knee, identical prostheses implanted with a similar surgical technique, and no postoperative complications which may have affected the range of movement.

The most important factors which influenced the range of movement after arthroplasty were the preoperative range of flexion and the body-weight of the patient. There was a significant improvement in flexion and reduction of flexion contracture at each successive review up to 12 months after operation. Patients with restricted movement before operation showed a satisfactory gain at final review.

We report a prospective study of 46 patients with acute complete dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. They were all treated by suture of the deltoid and trapezius over the clavicle with no repair of the coracoclavicular ligaments, using only temporary fixation with two wires. At operation 43 patients (93.5%) had damage to the trapezius or deltoid or both. The coracoclavicular ligaments were intact in six (13%). Follow-up was from 2 to 7.9 years (mean 5.8), and at the latest review only five patients (10.9%) had redisplacement, due to premature removal of wires for infection in one, to migration of the wires in another and to partial failure of the muscle repair in three. We consider that the deltoid and trapezius attachments are important clinical stabilizers of the clavicle and that their repair, with reinforcement, is a useful addition to any method of surgical treatment.