This study investigated whether the use of tranexamic acid (TXA)
decreased blood loss and transfusion related cost following surface
replacement arthroplasty (SRA). A retrospective review of patients treated with TXA during a
SRA, who did not receive autologous blood (TXA group) was performed.
Two comparison groups were established; the first group comprised
of patients who donated their own blood pre-operatively (auto group)
and the second of patients who did not donate blood pre-operatively
(control). Outcomes included transfusions, post-operative haemoglobin
(Hgb), complications, and length of post-operative stay. Aims
Methods
Most hip fractures treated with modern internal
fixation techniques will heal. However, failures occasionally occur and
require revision procedures. Salvage strategies employed during
revision are based on whether the fixation failure occurs in the
femoral neck, or in the intertrochanteric region. Patient age and
remaining bone stock also influence decision making. For fractures
in young patients, efforts are generally focused on preserving the
native femoral head via osteotomies and repeat internal fixation.
For failures in older patients, some kind of hip replacement is
usually selected. Disuse osteopenia, deformity, bone loss, and stress-risers
from previous internal fixation devices all pose technical challenges
to successful reconstruction. Attention to detail is important in
order to minimise complications. In the majority of cases, good
outcomes have been reported for the various salvage strategies. Cite this article:
Pelvic discontinuity represents a rare but challenging
problem for orthopaedic surgeons. It is most commonly encountered
during revision total hip replacement, but can also result from
an iatrogentic acetabular fracture during hip replacement. The general
principles in management of pelvic discontinuity include restoration
of the continuity between the ilium and the ischium, typically with
some form of plating. Bone grafting is frequently required to restore
pelvic bone stock. The acetabular component is then impacted, typically
using an uncemented, trabecular metal component. Fixation with multiple
supplemental screws is performed. For larger defects, a so-called
‘cup–cage’ reconstruction, or a custom triflange implant may be
required. Pre-operative CT scanning can greatly assist in planning
and evaluating the remaining bone stock available for bony ingrowth.
Generally, good results have been reported for constructs that restore
stability to the pelvis and allow some form of biologic ingrowth. Cite this article:
