Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 11_Supple_A | Pages 105 - 111
1 Nov 2014
Vince KG

There are many reasons why a total knee replacement (TKR) may fail and qualify for revision. Successful revision surgery depends as much on accurate assessment of the problem TKR as it does on revision implant design and surgical technique. Specific modes of failure require specific surgical solutions. Causes of failure are often presented as a list or catalogue, without a system or process for making a decision. In addition, strict definitions and consensus on modes of failure are lacking in published series and registry data. How we approach the problem TKR is an essential but neglected aspect of understanding knee replacement surgery. It must be carried out systematically, comprehensively and efficiently. Eight modes of failure are described: 1) sepsis; 2) extensor discontinuity; 3) stiffness; 4) tibial- femoral instability; 5) patellar tracking; 6) aseptic loosening and osteolysis; 7) periprosthetic fracture and 8) component breakage. A ninth ‘category’, unexplained pain is an indication for further investigation but not surgery.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B(11 Suppl A):105–11.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 94-B, Issue 11_Supple_A | Pages 126 - 133
1 Nov 2012
Vince KG

In this paper, we consider wound healing after total knee arthroplasty.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 94-B, Issue 11_Supple_A | Pages 103 - 111
1 Nov 2012
Vince KG

Seven stiff total knee arthroplasties are presented to illustrate the roles of: 1) manipulation under general anesthesia; 2) multiple concurrent diagnoses in addition to stiffness; 3) extra-articular pathology; 4) pain as part of the stiffness triad (pain and limits to flexion or extension); 5) component internal rotation; 6) multifactorial etiology; and 7) surgical exposure in this challenging clinical problem.