Abstract. Introduction. Knee arthrodesis is one of the treatment options for limb salvage of a failed total knee replacement (TKR) when further revisions were contraindicated. The aim of this study is to determine patient outcomes after knee arthrodesis (KA) following a failed TKR. Methodology. A literature search was conducted for studies published from January 2000 through January 2022 via Medline, Web of Science, Embase and Cochrane databases. Only primary research studies were included with independent extraction of articles by two reviewers. Results were synthesised by narrative review according to PRISMA guidelines, with full tabulation of all included study results. Results. A total of 34 studies with 1,034 patients were included in the review; all were longitudinal observational studies, and none were conducted as randomised controlled trials. Reporting methods were very inconsistent in the included studies, and this heterogeneity led to pooled data totals that varied widely in different categories. The mean follow-up was 3.5 years. Overall, 72.0% (167 of 232) of patients used a walking stick and 12.5% (36 of 287) remained non-ambulatory after KA. Only 7.7% (58 of 752) of patients subsequently underwent above-knee amputation. Conclusion. KA is a potential limb salvage procedure after revision arthroplasties have been attempted in cases of failed TKR. Most patients were able to ambulate both at home and in the community, although with an increased rate of using a walking stick after the operation. However, in the absence of randomised controlled trials, these data may allow for a more accurate counselling and decision making

Aim. Knee arthrodesis (KA) and above knee amputation (AKA) have been used for salvage of failed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the setting of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The factors that lead to a failed fusion and progression to AKA are not well understood. The purpose of our study was to determine factors associated with failure of a staged fusion for PJI and predictive of progression to AKA. Method. We retrospectively reviewed a single-surgeon series of failed TKA for PJI treated with two-stage KA between 2000 and 2016 with minimum 2-year follow-up. Patient demographics, comorbidities, surgical history, tissue compromise, and radiographic data were recorded. Outcomes were additional surgery, delayed union, Visual Analog Pain scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Activity score (WOMAC). No power analysis was performed for this retrospective study. Medians are reported as data were not normally distributed. Results. Fifty-one knees underwent fusion with median follow-up of 7 years (interquartile range (IQR) of 2–18 years). Median age was 71 years old (IQR 47 – 98), with a M:F ratio of 23:28. Median BMI was 34.3 kg/m2 (IQR 17.9–61). Infection was eradicated in 47 knees (92.2%); 24 knees (47.0%) required no additional surgery. 41 patients (83.6%) remained ambulatory after knee fusion, with 21% of these patients (10 total) requiring no ambulatory assistive device. Median VAS following arthrodesis was 4.6 (range 0–10). Median WOMAC was 36.2 (range 9–86). Three TKAs (5.9%) underwent AKA for overwhelming infection. Predictors of AKA were chronic kidney disease (OR 4.0, 95% CI 0.6–26.8), peripheral vascular disease (OR 3.5, 95% CI 0.3–44.7), AORI III bone loss (OR 2.6, 95% CI 0.4–35.2), instability (OR 2.2, 95% CI 0.2–15.9), and immunosuppression (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.1–7.8). Tobacco use (OR 8.6, 95%CI 2.4–31.4), BMI>25 (OR 3.8, 95% CI 0.43–32.5) and instability prior to arthrodesis (OR 2.51, 95% CI 0.77–8.21) were associated with non-union. All other risk factors (gender, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, peripheral vascular disease, massive bone stock loss, and immunosuppression) were not associated with arthrodesis failure. Conclusions. Staged KA for PJI in severely compromised hosts provides a functional limb free of infection and rarely results in conversion to AKA. Given our small sample size, ability to establish statistical significance of predictive factors for AKA after PJI was limited, but CKD, peripheral vascular disease, AORI III bone loss, instability, and immunosuppression trended towards significance as predictors of failure of KA after PJI predisposing to AKA

Arthrodesis is used most commonly as a salvage procedure for failed total knee arthroplasty (TKA). For successful arthrodesis, a stable fusion technique and acceptable limb mechanical alignment are needed. Although the use of intramedullary alignment rods might be helpful in terms of achieving an acceptable limb mechanical axis, fat embolism and intramedullary dissemination of an infection or reactivation of latent infection might occur in failed TKA cases. However, computer-assisted surgery allows precise cuts to be made without breaching medullary cavities. Here, the authors describe a case of knee arthrodesis performed by computer navigation and the Ilizarov method in a patient with a past history of infection. A 45-year-old man visited our hospital with failed total knee arthroplasy. Fortunately, even though infection was treated by debridement with component retention, mild heating was present over the knee, but ESR(erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and CRP(C-reactive protein) were within normal ranges. X-ray showed subsidence of the femoral component and a radiolucent line around the femoral component. Arthrodesis was planned for this patient due to disabling pain, a long-lasting severe functional deficit, failure of the primary TKA for ankylosed knee, and the patient’s poor economic status and his strong desire for arthrodesis. The computer navigation surgery system and the Ilizarov method were used for two reasons. The first reason was that the patient had a past history of infection. At pre-operative evaluation, even though ESR and CRP levels were within normal range, we could not completely rule out the possibility of latent infection due to suspicious findings such as long lasting disabling knee pain, mild heating over the knee, severe osteolytic radiographic changes around the femoral component. In that situation, inserting an IM rod to achieve acceptable mechanical alignment might have reactivated and disseminated a possible latent infection to the femoral or tibial medullary canals. The second reason was that we wanted to reduce the possibility of fat embolism by using computer navigation without instrumentation within the medullary canal. A CT-free, wireless computer navigation system was applied, with trackers fixed to the femur and tibia and no requirement for the use of an IM rod with component retention. Navigated femoral and tibial bone resections were then performed using Stryker software. The femoral resection was conducted at 0° of flexion to the sagittal axis, and the tibial resection at 7 ° of flexion to the sagittal axis. Arthrodesis was held in proper axial and rotational alignment with bone surfaces compressed together. Finally, knee arthrodesis was completed using the Ilizarov method. Based on our experience of the described case, we believe that arthrodesis for failed TKR, especially failure secondary to intraarticular infection, can be considered as another indication for computer navigation

Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is becoming a more frequent procedure throughout Europe. Painful patello-femoral problems, patellar dislocation, impingement pain as well as aseptic loosening and gross malalignment are among many causes. We investigated the use of CT scans in identifying alignment causes for pain in failed TKA where no other obvious cause is found. Twenty poorly functioning TKA were analysed using the Perth CT protocol. All patients were awaiting revision TKA and had no obvious evidence of infection or loosening. They were scanned using a GE multislice CT scanner. The measurements were performed using standard CT software. Knee society scores were obtained pre- and post-operatively. The mean coronal position of the components was three degrees of valgus for the femoral component and 2.5 degrees of varus for the tibial component. Fourteen knees had errors of femoral component rotation, which ranged from one degree of external rotation to nine degrees of internal rotation. The cumulative error of implantation ranged from 6–24 degrees in all planes. Knee society scores improved post-operatively from a mean of 52 pre-operatively to 83 at one year. Compound error also improved to a range of 6 to 10 degrees in all planes. Revision TKA remains a difficult procedure that is increasing in frequency. The use of a CT protocol allows all coronal, sagital and rotational errors of an implant to be accurately identified prior to surgery. This could be useful in the small groups of patients with painful TKA that have no obvious cause for failure. Total knee replacement failure in these cases maybe explained by a cumulative error in alignment and correction of which may improve their Knee Society Scores. We believe that a CT scan of a failed TKA is useful as part of the pre operative planning and also in investigating painful TKA where no obvious cause is found

Knee arthrodesis is a useful procedure in difficult cases such as failed total knee arthroplasty, bone tumors and infected knee joints. A review of 27 cases treated using a modular locked intramedullary nail “Wichita” in 4 hospitals was performed. This fusion nail is a device designed to provide simultaneous compression and intramedullary fixation. The device is implanted through a single knee incision using three main components after femoral and tibial reaming. The femoral components inserts retrograde and has two holes in its proximal end to accept transverse locking screws. The tibial component inserts anterograde into the proximal tibia and has some holes for transverse screw placement. The compression screw component is used to lock the femoral and tibial components together and simultaneusly compression is generated across the joint line. Teorical advantages are single incision, inmediate and solid stability, posibility of compression, adjust of length, high fusion rates and less risk of infection than other procedures. An individual study protocol was made and it includes previous primary or revision failed total knee replacement, severe articular trauma and infection. No bone tumors were includes. Protocol includes aspects such as operative time and blood loss,intraoperative complications, radiographic evaluation (tibiofemoral alignement, contact tibiofemoral surface area...) shortenning of extremity, time to union, posoperative complications and patient subjective evaluation.10 patients are being studied prospectively in our institution since january 2000 and the mean follow-up is 16 months. 17 patients were retrospectively studied in 3 differents hospitals using the same protocol and the mean follow-up is 26 months. Global results show a solid fusion in 26 (96 per cent) of the 27 patients at an average time of 15 weeks (range 12 to 22 weeks) after the operation. There were one mechanical failure of the implant (thecnical mistake during assembly of the compression screw component). There were 2 non desplaced fractures in the end of the nail. There was 1 desplaced fracture and removed of implant was required, osteosynthesis was performed with a long intramedullary nail. No infections were detected. These results and others are related. Although good results observed, with high fusion rates and minimal complications, a potential disadvantage is the difficult to remove the nail if this is necesary

Purpose: To introduce our surgical technique and report the clinical results of the knee arthrodesis with a Huck-step nail after a failed infected TKA. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed four patients who underwent knee arthrodesis with a Huck-stepnail after failed infected total knee arthroplasty. The average age of the patients at the time of the arthrodesis was 73 years (range: 70–79 years) and the mean number of previous surgical procedures was 3.2 (range:3–4 procedures). All patients had medical problems including diabetes mellitus and hypertension. We performed local bone graft in all cases. The duration of average follow-up was 20.2 months (range:12–36 months). Results: Bone union was achieved within 1 year after arthrodesis radiologically. There was neither displacement of nail nor loosening. The average limb-length discrepancy was 3cm, measured clinically. All patients had a discrepancy that was corrected with a shoe-lift. Conclusion: Arthrodesis with a Huckstep nail after failed infected total knee arthroplasty provides immediate axial and rotational stability and allows weight-bearing without use of external support

Aim & introduction. Infected knee with bone defect resulting from failed total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or destruction of native joint can necessitate restoration of segmental defect and arthrodesis for therapy of infection and maintenance of walking ability. In segmental knee defect external fixators or KAFO are not suitable, not comfortable and poor tolerated by elderly patients. Both custom-made Femoro-Tibial Nail (FTN) combined with acrylic cement spacer and Knee Arthrodesis Nail System (KANS) offer maintenance of supportive function of extremity and avoidance of leg length discrepance after removal of TKA. Method. The group consists of 13 patients. In 12 cases knee arthrodesis have been performed due to infection with bone defect after removal of infected TKA, and in 1case due to inflammatory destruction of native knee joint. In 7 cases FTN with ALAC spacer and in 6 cases KANS (5 cases Orthopedic Salvage System-OSS; 1 case Link KANS) was used. In cases treated with FTN the gap between distal femur and proximal tibia was filled with hand-made acrylic cement spacer loaded with selected antibiotic (2g per 40 g cement) so that the spacer finally gained cylindrical shape. Results. Stable knee was noted after 7 years in 4 of 7 knees treated with FTN with ALAC spacer and after 2 years in 6 of 6 after KANS. Infection free knee was gained after 7 years in 4 of 7 cases treated with FTN with ALAC spacer and after 2 years in 5 of 6 cases treated with KANS. Amputation was necessary after 6 years in 3 of 7 cases treated with FTN with ALAC spacer and after 2 years in none case treated with KANS. Complications occurred in 2 cases after FTN with ALAC spacer (1x: FTN breackage, 1x: stress fracture of femoral neck) and in 1 case after KANS (OSS implant failure). Replacement of FTN nail and cement spacer in 1 case and respectively revision of OSS KANS in 1 cases was performed. Conclusions. Compared with the KANS, custom-made FTN combined with ALAC spacer proved to be effective up to 6 years, but shoved higher rate of complications and amputations after 6 years. It can be considered as a temporary low-cost salvage procedure for infected TKA with segmental bone defect as 1. st. stage in two-stage arthrodesis for infected knee prosthesis

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to unprecedented times worldwide. From lockdowns to masks now being part of our everyday routine, to the halting of elective surgeries, the virus has touched everyone and every part of our personal and professional lives. Perhaps, now more than ever, our ability to adapt, change and persevere is critical to our survival. This year's closed meeting of The Knee Society demonstrated exactly those characteristics. When it became evident that an in-person meeting would not be feasible, The Knee Society leadership, under the direction of President John Callaghan, MD and Program Chair Craig Della Valle, MD created a unique and engaging meeting held on September 10–12, 2020. Special recognition should be given to Olga Foley and Cynthia Garcia at The Knee Society for their flexibility and creativeness in putting together a world-class flawless virtual program. The Bone & Joint Journal is very pleased to partner with The Knee Society to once again publish the proceedings of the closed meeting of the Knee Society. The Knee Society is a United States based society of highly selected members who have shown leadership in education and research in knee surgery. It invites up to 15% international members; this includes some of the key opinion leaders in knee surgery from outside the USA. Each year, the top research papers from The Knee Society meeting will be published and made available to the wider orthopaedic community in The Bone & Joint Journal. The first such proceedings were published in BJJ in 2019. International dissemination should help to fulfil the mission and vision of the Knee Society of advancing the care of patients with knee disorders through leadership, education and research. The quality of dissemination that The Bone & Joint Journal provides should enhance the profile of this work and allow a larger body of surgeons, associated healthcare professionals and patients to benefit from the expertise of the members of The Knee Society. The meeting is one of the highlights of the annual academic calendar for knee surgeons. With nearly every member in attendance virtually throughout the 3 days, the top research papers from the membership were presented and discussed in a virtual format that allowed for lively interaction and discussion. There are 75 abstracts presented. More selective proceedings with full papers will be available after a robust peer review process in 2021, both online and in The Bone & Joint Journal. The meeting commenced with the first group of scientific papers focused on Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Dr Berry and colleagues from the Mayo Clinic further help to clarify the issue of serology and aspirate results to diagnose TKA PJI in the acute postoperative setting. 177 TKA's had an aspiration within 12 weeks and 22 were proven to have PJI. Their results demonstrated that acute PJI after TKA should be suspected within 6 weeks if CRP is ≥81 mg/L, synovial WBCs are ≥8500 cells/μL, and/or synovial neutrophils≥86%. Between 6– 12 weeks, concerning thresholds include a CRP ≥ 32 mg/L, synovial WBC ≥7450, and synovial neutrophils ≥ 84%. While historically the results of a DAIR procedure for PJI have been variable, Tom Fehring's study showed promise with the local delivery of vancomycin through the Intraosseous route improved early results. New member Simon Young contrasted the efficacy of the DAIR procedure when comparing early infections to late acute hematogenous PJI. DAIR failed in 63% of late hematogenous PJIs (implant age>1 year) compared to 36% of early (<1year) PJIs. Dr Masri demonstrated in a small group of patients that those with well-functioning articulating spacers can retain their spacers for over 12 months with no difference in infection from those that had a formal two stage exchange. The mental toll of PJI was demonstrated in a longitudinal study by Doug Dennis, where patient being treated with 2 stage exchange had 4x higher rates of depression compared to patient undergoing aseptic revision. The second session focused on both postoperative issues with regards to anticoagulation and manipulation. Steven Haas demonstrated high complication rates with utilization of anticoagulation for treatment of postoperative pulmonary embolism with modern therapeutic anticoagulation (warfarin, enoxaparin, Xa inhibitors) with the Xa inhibitors demonstrating lower complication rates. Two papers focused on the topic of manipulation. Mark Pagnano presented data on timing of manipulation under anesthesia up to even past 12 months. While gains were modest, a subset of patients did achieve substantial gains in ROM > 20degrees even after 3 months post op. Dr Westrich's study demonstrated no difference in MUA outcomes with either IV sedation or neuraxial anesthesia although the length of stay was shorter in the IV sedation group. Several studies in Session II focused on kinematics and femoral component position. Dr Li's in vivo kinematic study during weightbearing flexion and gait demonstrated that several knees rotated with a lateral pivot motion and not all knees can be described with a single motion character. Dr Mayman and his group utilized a computational knee model to demonstrate that additional distal femoral resection results in increasing levels of mid -flexion instability and cautioned against the use of additional bony resection as the first line for flexion contractures. Using computer navigation, Dr Huddleston's study nicely outlined the variability in femoral component rotation to achieve a rectangular flexion gap utilizing a gap balanced method. The third session opened the meeting on Friday morning. The focus was on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and the increasing utilization of robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty. David Murray showed using registry data that for patient with higher comorbidities (ASA >3), UKA was safer and more cost effective than TKA while Dr Della Valle's group demonstrated overall lower average healthcare costs in UKA patients compared to TKA in the first 10 years after surgery. Dr Geller assessed UKA survivorship among 3 international registries. While survivorship varied by nation and designs, certain designs consistently had better overall performance. Dr Nunley and his group showed robotic navigation UKA significantly reduced outliers in alignment and overhang compared to manual UKA. Dr Catani's data demonstrated that full thickness cartilage loss should still be considered a requirement for UKA success even with robotic assistance. Despite a high dislocation rate of 4%, Mr Dodd demonstrated high survivorship for lateral UKA despite historical contraindications. The growing evidence for robotics TKA was demonstrated in two studies. Professor Haddad showed less soft tissue injury, reduced bone trauma and improved accuracy or rTKA compared to manual TKA while Dr Gustke single surgeon study showed his rTKA had improved forgotten joint scores and less ligament releasing required for balancing. Despite these finding, Dr Lee's study demonstrated that a robotic TKA could not guarantee excellent pain relief and other factors such a patient expectations and psychological factors play a role. Our fourth session was devoted to machine learning and smart tools and modeling. Dr Meneghini used machine learning algorithms to identify optimal alignment outcomes that correlated with patient outcomes. Several parameters such as native tibial slope, femoral sagittal position and coronal limb alignment correlated with outcomes. Along the same lines, Bozic and coauthors demonstrated that using AI algorithms incorporated with PROM's improved levels of shared decision making and patient satisfaction. Dr Lombardi demonstrated that a mobile patient engagement platform that provided smart phone-based exercise and education was comparable to traditional methods. Dr Mahfouz demonstrated the accuracy of using ultrasound to produce 3D models of the bone compared to conventional CT based strategies and Dr Mahoney showed the valued of a preop 3D model in reproducing more normal knee kinematics. The last two talks of the session focused on some of the positives of the COVID-19 pandemic, namely the embracing of telemedicine by patients and surgeons as demonstrated by Dr Slover and the increasing and far reaching educational opportunities made available to residents and fellows during the pandemic. Session five focused on risk stratification and optimization prior to TKA. Dr O'Connor demonstrated that that the implementation of an optimization program preoperatively reduced length of stay and ED visits, and Charles Nelson's study showed that risk stratification tool can lower complication rates in obese patients undergoing TKA comparable to those that are nonobese. Dr Markel's study demonstrated that those who have preoperative depression and anxiety are at higher risk of complications and readmissions after surgery and these issues should be addressed preoperatively. Interestingly, a study by Dr Callaghan demonstrated that care improvement pathways have not lowered the gap in complications for morbidly obese patients undergoing TKA, Dr Barsoum argued that the overall complication rates were low and this patient cohort had significant gains in PROMS after TKA that would not be experienced if arbitrary cutoff for limited surgery were established. The final session on Friday, Session six, had several well done and interesting studies. There continues to be mounting evidence that liposomal bupivacaine has little effect on managing post-operative pain to warrant its increased use. Bill Macaulay and colleagues showed no change in pain scores, opioid consumption and functional scores when liposomal bupivacaine was discontinued at a large academic medical center. Dr Bugbee importantly demonstrated that a supervised ambulation program reduced falls in the early postoperative period. Several paper on healthcare economics were presented. Rich Iorio showed that stratifying complexity of total joint cases between hospitals with a system can be efficient and cost savings while Dr Jiranek demonstrated in his study that complex TKAs can be identified preoperatively and are associated with prolonged operative time and cost of care and consideration should be given in future reimbursement models to a complexity modifier. Dr Springer, in their evaluation of Medicare bundled payment models, demonstrated that providers and hospitals in historical bundled models that became efficient were penalized in the new model, forcing many groups to drop out and return to a fee for service model. Ron Delanois important work showed that social determinants can have a major negative impact on outcomes following TKA. Our final day on Saturday opened with Session seven, and several interesting paper on metal ions/debris in TKA. Dr Whitesides simulator study showed the absence of scratches and material loss in a ceramic TKA compared with Co-Cr TKA and suggested an advantage to this material in patients with metal sensitivity. Conversely, in a histological study of failed TKA, perivascular lymphocytic infiltration was not associated with worse clinical outcomes or differences in revision in a series of 617 aseptic revisions, 19% of which had PVLI found on histology. The Mayo group and Dr Trousdale however, noted that serum metal ion levels can be helpful in identifying implant failure in a group of revision TKAs, especially those with metallic junctions. Dr Dalury demonstrated nicely that use of maximally conforming inserts did not have a negative effect on implant loosening in a series of 76 revision TKA's at an average follow up of 7 years, while Kevin Garvin and his group showed no difference in end of stem pain between cemented and cementless stems in revision TKA. The final two studies in the session by Bolognesi and Peters respectively showed that metaphyseal cones continue to demonstrate excelled survivorship in rTKA setting despite extensive bone loss. Session eight was highlighted by a large series of revision reported by new member Dr Schwarzkopf, who showed that revision TKA done by high volume surgeons demonstrated better outcomes and lower revision rates compared to surgeon who did less than 18 rTKA's per year. Dr Maniar importantly showed that preoperatively, patients with high activity level and low pain and indicated by a high preop forgotten joint score did poorly following TKA while David Ayers nicely demonstrated that KOOS scores that assess specific postoperative outcomes can predict patient dissatisfaction after TKA. The final paper in this session by Max Courtney showed that the majority of surgical cancellations are due to medical issues, yet a minority of these undergo any intervention specifically for that condition, but they resulted in a delay of 5 months. The first two studies of Session nine focused on polyethylene thickness. Dr Backstein demonstrated no difference in KSS scores, change in ROM and aseptic revision rates based on polyethylene thickness in a series of 195 TKA's. An interesting lab study by Dr Tim Wright showed a surprising consistency in liner thickness choice among varying levels of surgeon experience that did not correlate with applied forces or gap stability estimates. Two studies looked specifically at the issue of tibial loosening and implant design. Nam and colleagues were not able to demonstrate concerning findings for increasing tibial loosening in a tibial baseplate with a shortened tibial keel at short term follow up, while Lachiewicz demonstrated a 19% revision or revision pending rate in 223 cemented fixed bearing ATTUNE TKA at a mean of 30 months. Our final session of the meeting, began with encouraging news, that despite only currently capturing about 40% of TJA's done in the US, the American Joint Replacement Registry data is representative of data in other representative US databases. An interesting study presented by Robert Barrack looked at bone remodeling in the proximal tibia after cemented and cementless TKA of two different designs. No significant difference was noted among the groups with the exception of the cemented thicker cobalt chrome tray which demonstrated significantly more bone mineral density loss. Along the same lines, a study out of Dr Bostrom's lab demonstrated treatment of a murine tibial model with iPTH prevents fibrous tissue formation and enhances bone formation in cementless implants. New Member Jamie Howard showed no difference in implant migration and kinematics of a single radius cementless design using either a measured resection or gap balancing technique and Dr Cushner show no difference in blood loss with cemented or cementless TKA with the use of TKA. The final two studies looked at staging and bilateral TKA's. Peter Sharkey showed that simultaneous TKA's were associated with higher complication compared to staged TKA and that staged TKA with less than a 90-day interval was not associated with higher risk. However, Mark Figgie showed that patients undergoing simultaneous TKA compared to staged TKA, missed 17 fewer days of work. In spite of the virtual nature of the meeting, there were some outstanding scientific interactions and the material presented will continue to generate debate and to guide the direction of knee arthroplasty as we move forwards

Background. The use of Computed Tomography (CT) as a medical imaging tool has widespread applications in the field of knee surgery. Surgeons use a CT scan in a conventional way during the pre-operative stage, to plan the position of the femoral component in the horizontal plane. In the post-operative stage, the use of a CT scan is a routine tool in the evaluation of failed TKA as rotational malalignment of the femoral component has been determined as a cause of poor clinical outcome after TKA. Aim. How accurately can we measure the different angles with importance for alignment on a 3D-image in comparison to a standard CT, 2D, image. Material and methods. This study includes patients above 55 years of age who were scheduled for a TKA at our centre and who had a pre- and postoperative full-leg length computed tomography (CT). These images were analysed using Mimics V 16.0 ® and 3-matic V 8.0 ® (Materialise, Haasrode, Belgium) to create the surface reconstruction and perform the 3D-measurements. Different angles were measured pre- and post-operatively on these images both in 2D as in 3D: condylar twist angle (CTA), posterior condylar angle (PCA), hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), tibiofemoral rotation angle (TFRA), posterior tilt of the tibial implant (STPA) and the frontal plane angle of the tibial implant (FTPA). A power analysis showed a needed sample size of 18 patients. Pre-operatively 21 patients were included, 18 of them also received a post-operative full-leg CT. Three observers participated in the study and they all performed all analyses twice with a minimum interval of one week for obtaining intra-observer repeatability. Statistical analysis was performed to obtain the intra- and interobserver variability. Results. The intra-and interobserver intra-class coefficients (ICC) were evaluated using the classification of Landis&Koch (see table). Preoperative results: Rotation of femoral component in 3D: ICC CTA=0,73; ICC PCA=0,66. Rotation in 2D: ICC PCA=0,75, ICC CTA=0,84. The highest ICC was found for the HKA: ICC>0,98 both 2D and 3D. Postoperative results. All ICC's are in the highest category (‘almost perfect’) except for the intraobserver ICC PCA in 2D which was ‘substantial’. Conclusions and clinical implications. CT-evaluation is invaluable for the preoperative planning of the position of the femoral component, for the evaluation of the rotation of the femoral component and for accurate assessment of the overall knee alignment,. This study demonstrates low intra- and inter- observer variability in the CT measurement of the pre- and postoperative alignment of the knee. To determine the rotation of the femoral component preoperatively there was no advantage for 3D over 2D. Post-operatively the use of the 3D technique has a lower variability with regard to the assessment of the rotation of the femoral component

The vast majority of fractures around the knee will heal with well-done internal fixation. TKA has a role in several scenarios. Acute TKA can be effective for fractures of the distal femur (especially periprosthetic) in very elderly patients where internal fixation attempts are likely to fail. Acute TKA for tibia plateau fractures may have a role in fractures in the elderly with pre-existing DJD and relatively simple fracture patterns. There is very little published literature regarding the outcomes of TKA for acute tibial plateau fracture and caution is advised until more data is available. TKA is commonly indicated for failed fixation and post-traumatic arthritis. Challenges include managing retained hardware, soft tissue injury and contracture, unusual ligamentous imbalances, and multiple prior incisions and/or flaps. Occasionally, a partial hardware removal may be appropriate. If extensive or multiple incisions are needed for hardware removal it may be wise to stage the reconstruction after soft tissue recovery. The available data on TKA for post-traumatic reconstructions generally demonstrate predictable functional improvement but higher complications

The purpose of our study was to assess the success rate of methods used for knee arthrodesis in failed total knee arthroplasty and to do a functional evaluation after arthrodesis of the knee. A physiotherapist and occupational therapist assessed 10 patients who had undergone knee arthrodesis, using either the Orthofix or Ilizarov methods. Both methods were successful. There were no failures. The functional outcomes were satisfactory

The gold standard for measuring knee alignment is the lower limb mechanical axis. This is traditionally assessed by weight-bearing full length lower limb X-rays (LLX). CT scanograms (CTS) are however, becoming increasingly popular in view of lower radiation exposure, speed and supine positioning. We assessed the correlation and reproducibility of knee joint coronal alignment using these two imaging modalities. LLX and CTS images were obtained in 24 knees with degenerate joint disease or failed TKR. Hip to ankle mechanical alignment were measured using the PACS software. Coronal knee alignment was assessed from the centre of the knee, measuring the valgus/varus angle relative to the mechanical axis. Measurements were made by two orthopaedic surgeons (Research Fellow and Consultant) on two separate occasions. The mean alignment angles measured by observers 1 and 2 on CTS were 180.29° (SD 6.04) and 180.71° (SD 6.13) respectively, while on LLX were 181.04° (SD7.58) and 181.04° (SD 7.72). The measurements between the two observers were highly correlated for both the CTS (r = 0.97, p < 0.001) and the LLX (r = 0.99, p < 0.001). The angles measured on CTS and LLX were highly correlated (r = 0.826, p < 0.001) with high degree of internal consistency (ICC = 0.804). Malalignment of greater than 5° was seen in 19% of the CTS and 35% of the LLX. There was good correlation between CT scanogram and weight-bearing X-ray measurements in normally-aligned knees. However, as expected, in the malaligned lower limb, the influence of weight-bearing is critical which demonstrates the significance of weight-bearing X-rays

Aims

Metal allergy in knee arthroplasty patients is a controversial topic. We aimed to conduct a scoping review to clarify the management of metal allergy in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Full-thickness burns around the knee can involve the extensor mechanism. The gastrocnemius flap is well described for soft tissue reconstruction around the knee. We describe a method where a Whichita Fusion Nail¯ knee arthrodesis, combined with a medial gastrocnemius muscle flap was used to salvage the knee and preserve the lower leg following a full-thickness contact burn. The gastrocnemius flap for wound coverage of an open knee joint was originally described in 1970 and remains the workhorse for soft tissue knee reconstruction. There are a number of local alternatives including the vastus lateralis, medialis and sartorius flap; and perforator flaps such as the medial sural artery perforator island flap and islanded posterior calf perforator flap, however many of these are unsuitable for larger defects. Full-thickness burns around the knee can put the extensor mechanism at risk and subsequent rupture is a possible consequence. The gastrocnemius flap has been used to cover a medial knee defect with exposed joint cavity following a burn and also been used in post burn contracture release around the knee. The primary indication for Wichita fusion nail is a failed total knee replacement. It allows intramedullary stabilization with compression at the arthrodesis site to stimulate bone union. With fusion rates reported up to 100% and low complication rates as compared to other methods of fusion, the technique has a useful role in limb salvage type procedures. While use of the gastrocnemius flap in knee burns has been described before we believe this is the first time that this combination of techniques, namely knee arthrodesis with soft tissue reconstruction using a gastrocnemius flap, has been reported. Combining these procedures with a multidisciplinary approach provides a useful alternative leading to limb salvage and avoiding the need for an above knee amputation when extensor reconstruction is not possible

Introduction: Failed total knee replacement due to the daemage of bone stock and infection requires removal of prosthesis. Successful arthrodesis is strongly related to the quality of bone stock. Both external fixators and KAFO are not comfortable and thus poor tolerated by elderly patients. Instable knee is very disabling condition. Custom-made femoro-tibial nail combined with acrylic cement spacer offers maintenance of supportive function of extremity after removal of knee prosthesis. Avoidance of leg length discrepance is possible. Nailing can be considered only as salvage procedure for one knee. Material and Method: Six elderly patients underwent unilateral arthrodesis of the knee after removal of knee prosthesis due to the daemage to the bone stock and periprosthetic infection. They have had conical shape of the lower leg and poor quality to the bone. Thus they were not suitable for conventional knee arthrodesis using external fixator or for pseudoarthrosis and KAFO. After removal of TKR and debridement of periprosthetic tissues an ortograde, custom-made femoro-tibial interlocking nail was inserted. The gap betveen distal femur and proximal tibia was filled with hand-made acrylic cement spacer loaded with vancomycin (2g per 40 g cement) so that the spacer finally gained tubular shape. Results: No recurrence of infection was noted. Early postoperative full-weight bearing was possible. Implant failure occurred in one case and required replacement of nail and cement spacer. Stress fracture of femoral neck occurred in another case. Despite of this problems all patients has better ADL than with KAFO or after. Conclusion: femoro-tibial nail for failed TKR is good accepted and comfortable for patient. Disadvantage of this type of nail is stiff knee and risk for nail fracture

Introduction: Arthrodesis of the knee nowadays is used as a salvage procedure, commonly for patients with a failed TKR or in infected trauma cases. We present 4 patients with extensive bone defects following septic sequelae of trauma treated by Arthrodesis of the knee joint. Materials and Methods: Four patients (avg. 46.5 years; range 37–57 years; three male and one female) with longstanding infected non-union fractures (3 months–2 years) at the knee joint (three Tibial plateau and one distal femur) were treated by initial debridement and removal of dead or infected bone. This led to substantial bone defects (6–12 cm) of the debrided bone at the knee joint. The patients then underwent bone transport with a circular frame to compensate for this bone defect before achieving an Arthrodesis of the knee joint. Three patients also had a free muscle flap for soft tissue coverage before bone transport was begun. Results: Arthrodesis of the knee was achieved in all patients at an average time of 26 months (20–32 months). None of the patients have any active infection of the limb. Discussion and Conclusions: Knutson et al (1984) said that massive bone loss may substantially reduce the success rate of Arthrodesis of the knee. Wilde and Stearns (1989) noted decreased fusion rates with greater degrees of bone loss. In our series the bone defects were a sequelae of infective non-union, this further complicates the healing process. However, using circular frame for Bone transport to overcome the defect and to achieve compression at the Arthrodesis site is a useful technique for such challenging cases

Aim: To assess the outcome of knee arthrodesis using cemented Endo-Model knee fusion nail in failed total knee arthroplasty with significant bone loss due to infection. Methods: A Retrospective case study of seven patients with infected TKR and multiple surgeries and significant bone loss (Type III AORI classification). All patients had antibiotic loaded cement with a temporary K-nail as a first stage procedure to eradicate infection. All seven patients had arthrodesis performed using cemented modular Endo-Model Knee Fusion nail (Waldemar Link, Hamburg) by senior author (RSJ). The arthrodesis relied on the strong coupling mechanism of the nail and not on bony union, providing pain relief while mainting leg length. Outcomes assessed using pre–and post Visual Analogue Score (VAS) and Oxford knee scores. Results: Mean age 76.8 years (62–85). Mean follow up 23.7 months (3–42). The mean VAS pain score improved from 7.6 (6.5–8.5) pre-operatively to 1.1 (0–3.2) post-operatively. The mean post-operative Oxford score was 30.3 (27–36). One patient required revision for asceptic loosening. All but one of the patients thought that arthrodesis was preferable to amputation post-operatively. Conclusion: The Endo-Model knee fusion nail has good early results in terms of pain relief and knee arthrodesis where there is significant bone loss and extensor mechanism insufficiency following an infected total knee replacement

Introduction: Intramedullary cementless fixation of massive tumor prostheses was developed to combat the high incidence of aseptic loosening in a young population of tumor patients. Its use has also expanded to include reconstruction of failed major knee arthroplasty. Our system uses a hydroxyapatite coated titanium stem in conjunction with a hydroxyapatite collar to obtain fixation. Methods: We present a series of 72 patients (34 females, 38 males) with a mean follow-up of six years (2 months – 14 years). The mean age at the time of surgery was 17 (5 – 77). Within this group, 51 patients had osteosarcomas, 10 had giant cell tumors, eight had Ewing’s sarcoma and one each had malignant fibrous histiocytoma, spindle cell sarcoma and failed total knee arthroplasty. Non-invasive and minimally invasive growing prostheses were used in 33 patients. Results: Nine patients required revision of the prosthesis at a mean of 5.2 years; 5 for aseptic loosening and four for infection. Twelve patients died at a mean of 20 months (1 – 84) post-operatively. Radiological evidence demonstrated remodelling around both the stem and the collar. There was gap closure to the hydroxyapatite coated collar in cases where seating was not complete. Consistent loss of cortical bone around the mid-stem was noted in the first 12 months but remained stable beyond this time frame. Discussion: This study highlights our experience with cementless distal femoral endosprostheses. We demonstrate good results with regard to revision rate, gap closure and osseointegration

To assess the outcome of knee “arthrodesis” using cemented Endo-Model knee fusion nail in failed Total Knee Replacement (TKR) with significant bone loss due to infection. This is a retrospective case study of seven patients with infected TKR and multiple surgeries with significant bone loss. All patients had antibiotic loaded cement with a temporary K-nail as a first stage procedure to eradicate infection. All seven patients had “arthrodesis” performed using cemented modular Endo-Model Knee Fusion nail (Waldemar Link, Hamburg) by the senior author. Cement was used to hold the stems in the diaphyses and not used around the coupling mechanism. The “arthrodesis” relied entirely on the coupling mechanism which has been shown to have good axial and torsional rigidity by mechanical testing. Outcome was assessed using pre and post Visual Analogue Score (VAS). Mean age was 72.3 years(62–86). Mean follow up was 39.6 months (7–68). The VAS pain score improved from pre-operative mean score of 7.9 to a postoperative score of 1.5. One patient suffered fracture of femoral cement mantle at 50 months who underwent a technically easy exchange revision. One patient had recurrent infection with distal femoral fracture at 36 months and was revised to distal femoral replacement. The Endo-Model knee arthrodesis nail restores limb lengths, has good early results in terms of pain relief and provides a stable knee “arthrodesis” in cases where there is significant bone loss and extensor mechanism insufficiency following an infected TKR

Introduction: Arthrodesis of the knee nowadays is used as a salvage procedure, commonly for patients with a failed TKR or in infected trauma cases. We present 4 patients with extensive bone defects following septic sequelae of trauma treated by Arthrodesis of the knee joint. Materials and Methods: Four patients (avg. 46.5 years; range 37–57 years; three male and one female) with longstanding infected non-union fractures (3 months–2 years) at the knee joint (three Tibial plateau and one distal femur) were treated by initial debridement and removal of dead or infected bone. This led to substantial bone defects (6–12 cm) of the debrided bone at the knee joint. The patients then underwent bone transport with a circular frame to compensate for this bone defect before achieving an Arthrodesis of the knee joint. Three patients also had a free muscle flap for soft tissue coverage before bone transport was begun. Results: Arthrodesis of the knee was achieved in all patients at an average time of 26 months (20–32 months). None of the patients have any active infection of the limb. Discussion and Conclusions: Knutson et al (1984) said that massive bone loss may substantially reduce the success rate of Arthrodesis of the knee. Wilde and Stearns (1989) noted decreased fusion rates with greater degrees of bone loss. In our series the bone defects were a sequelae of infective non–union, this further complicates the healing process. However, using circular frame for Bone transport to overcome the defect and to achieve compression at the Arthrodesis site is a useful technique for such challenging cases