Introduction. Quantification of daily upper-limb activity is a key determinant in evaluation of shoulder surgery. For a number of shoulder diseases, problem in performing daily activities have been expressed in terms of upper-limb usage and non-usage. Many instruments measure upper-limb movement but do not focus on the differentiations between the use of left or right shoulder. Several methods have been used to measure it using only accelerometers, pressure sensors or video-based analysis. However, there is no standard or widely used objective measure for upper-limb movement. We report here on an objective method to measure the movement of upper-limb and we examined the use of 3D accelerometers and 3D gyroscopes for that purpose. Methods. We studied 8 subjects with unilateral pathological shoulder (8 rotator cuff disease: 53 years old ± 8) and compared them to 18 control subjects (10 right handed, 8 left handed: 32 years old ± 8, younger than the patient group to be almost sure they don_t have any unrecognized shoulder pathology). The Simple Shoulder Test (SST) and Disabilities of the Arm and Shoulder Score (DASH) questionnaires were completed by each subject. Two modules with 3 miniature capacitive gyroscopes and 3 miniature accelerometers were fixed by a patch on the dorsal side of the distal humerus, and one module with 3 gyroscopes and 3 accelerometers were fixed on the thorax. The subject wore the system during one day (8 hours), at home or wherever he/she went. We used a technique based on the 3D acceleration and the 3D angular velocities from the modules attached on the humerus. Results. As expected, we observed that for the stand and sit postures the right side is more used than the left side for a healthy right-handed person(idem on the left side for a healthy left-handed person). Subjects used their dominant upper-limb 18% more than the non-dominant upper-limb. The measurements on patients in daily life have shown that the patient has used more his non affected and non dominant side during daily activity if the dominant side = affected shoulder. If the dominant side ≠ affected shoulder, the difference can be showed only during walking period. Discussion-Conclusion. The technique developed and used allowed the quantification of the difference between dominant and non dominant side, affected and unaffected upper-limb activity. These results were encouraging for future evaluation of patients with shoulder injuries, before and after surgery. The feasibility and patient acceptability of the method using body fixed sensors for ambulatory evaluation of upper limbs kinematics was shown

Aims

The primary aim of this study is to quantify and compare outcomes following a dorsally displaced fracture of the distal radius in elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years) who are managed conservatively versus with surgical fixation (open reduction and internal fixation). Secondary aims are to assess and compare upper limb-specific function, health-related quality of life, wrist pain, complications, grip strength, range of motion, radiological parameters, healthcare resource use, and cost-effectiveness between the groups.

The COVID-19 pandemic presented a significant impact on orthopaedic surgical operating. This multi-centre study aimed to ascertain what factors contributed to delays to theatre in patients with shoulder and elbow trauma. A retrospective cohort study of 621 upper limb (shoulder and elbow) trauma patients between 16/03/2020 and 16/09/2021 (18-months) was extracted from trauma lists in NHS Tayside, Highland and Grampian and Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS). Median patient age =51 years (range 2-98), 298 (48%) were male and 323 (52%) female. The commonest operation was olecranon open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) 106/621 cases (17.1%), followed by distal humerus ORIF − 63/621 (10.1%). Median time to surgery was 2 days (range 0-263). 281/621 (45.2%) of patients underwent surgical intervention within 0-1 days and 555/621 patients (89.9%) had an operation within 14 days of sustaining their injury. 66/621 (10.6%) patients waited >14 days for surgery. There were 325/621 (52.3%) patients with documented evidence of delay to surgery; of these 55.6% (181/325) were due to amendable causes. 66/325 (20.3%) of these patients suffered complications; the most common being post-operative stiffness in 48.6% of cases (n=32/66). To our knowledge, this is the first study to specifically explore effect of COVID-19 pandemic on upper limb trauma patients. We suggest delays to theatre may have contributed to higher rates of post-operative stiffness and require more physiotherapy during the rehabilitation phase. In future pandemic planning, we propose dedicated upper-limb trauma lists to prevent delays to theatre and optimise patients’ post-operative outcomes

Abstract. INTRODUCTION. With increasing use of fluoroscopy in Orthopaedic theatres in recent years, the occupational radiation exposure to the surgeons and the theatre staff has increased significantly. Thyroid is one of the most radio-sensitive tissues in the body, but there is a clear lack of awareness among theatre staff of risks of radiation to thyroid. METHODS. We prospectively reviewed the use of thyroid shield by the theatre staff in the orthopaedic theatre for two weeks period. We also recorded the number of fluoroscopic images taken and total radiation dosage for each case. RESULTS. Our results showed that of 249 staff in the theatres of which, only 35 people (14.2%) wore thyroid shields during fluoroscopy, whereas 100% were complaint with body protection shield. We noticed that only 30% of the surgeons, 40% of the scrub nurses and 5% anaesthetist use this, while 95% of the radiographers uses thyroid protection in theatre. Average total radiation during upper-limb procedures was 1.25 cGy, during lower-limb procedures it was 43.48 cGy. Total radiations were very high particularly during lower-limb nailing procedures (80.98 cGy). CONCLUSION. Extensive use of fluoroscopy has a stochastic effect (accumulative effect) on thyroid gland particularly, if the dose in higher than 65 cGy. Despite its availability, only 14% people use the thyroid protection shield. We must emphasise the use of thyroid protection shield to the Orthopaedic surgeons, particularly during lower-limb procedures

Introduction. Shoulder arthroplasty (SA) has been performed with different types of implants, each requiring different replacement systems. However, data on previously utilized implant types are not always available before revision surgery, which is paramount to determining the appropriate equipment and procedure. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the AI models in classifying SA implant types. Methods. This systematic review was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, SCOPUS, and Web of Science from inception to December 2023, according to PRISMA guidelines. Peer-reviewed research evaluating the accuracy of AI-based tools on upper-limb X-rays for recognizing and categorizing SA implants was included. In addition to the overall meta-analysis, subgroup analysis was performed according to the type of AI model applied (CNN (Convolutional neural network), non-CNN, or Combination of both) and the similarity of utilized datasets between studies. Results. 13 articles were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis (including 138 different tests assessing models’ efficacy). Our meta-analysis demonstrated an overall sensitivity and specificity of 0.891 (95% CI:0.866-0.912) and 0.549 (95% CI:0.532,0.566) for classifying implants in SA, respectively. The results of our subgroup analyses were as follows: CNN-subgroup: a sensitivity of 0.898 (95% CI:0.873-0.919) and a specificity of 0.554 (95% CI:0.537,0.570), Non-CNN subgroup: a sensitivity of 0.809 (95% CI:0.665-0.900) and specificity of 0.522 (95% CI:0.440,0.603), combined subgroup: a sensitivity of 0.891 (95% CI:0.752-0.957) and a specificity of 0.547 (95% CI:0.463,0.629). Studies using the same dataset demonstrated an overall sensitivity and specificity of 0.881 (95% CI:0.856-0.903) and 0.542 (95% CI:0.53,0.554), respectively. Studies that used other datasets showed an overall sensitivity and specificity of 0.995 (95% CI:969,0.999) and 0.678 (95% CI:0.234, 0.936), respectively. Conclusion. AI-based classification of shoulder implant types can be considered a sensitive method. Our study showed the potential role of using CNN-based models and different datasets to enhance accuracy, which could be investigated in future studies

Purposes of study. Evaluation of the pre-operative documentation of neurovascular status in children presenting with Gartland Grades 2 and 3 supracondylar fractures and the development of an Emergency Department Proforma. Methods and results. A retrospective case-note review was performed on patients with Gartland Grade 2 and 3 supracondylar fractures observed in a two-year period from July 2008 – July 2010. 137 patients were included; sixteen patients (11.7%) sustained a Gartland Grade 2a fracture, sixty patients (43.8%) a Gartland Grade 2b fracture and sixty-one (44.5%) a Gartland Grade 3 fracture. Mean patient age at presentation was 5.59 years (range 12 months to 13 years). Nineteen patients (13.9%) had evidence of neurological deficit at presentation and thirteen patients (9.5%) presented with an absent radial pulse. Only twelve patients (8.8%) and nineteen patients (13.9%) respectively had a complete pre-operative neurological or vascular assessment documented. Regarding the individual nerves, fifty-nine (43.1%) patients had median nerve integrity documented, fifty-five (40.1%) ulnar nerve and forty-nine (35.8%) radial nerve integrity documented. Only eighteen patients (13.1%) had their anterior interosseous nerve function documented. Ten patients (7.3%) had post-operative neurological dysfunction, consisting of eight ulnar nerve injuries, and two radial nerve injuries. vi) Conclusions. Pre-operative documentation of neurovascular status in children with displaced supracondylar fractures was poor. Documentation of anterior interosseous nerve examination was particularly poor. We propose the introduction of a proforma (Liverpool Upper-limb Fracture Assessment – LUFA) to increase documentation of neurovascular assessment and optimise emergency department evaluation of children presenting with upper limb injuries

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of recruiting and retaining patients to a patient-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing corticosteroid injection (CSI) to autologous protein solution (APS) injection for the treatment of subacromial shoulder pain in a community care setting. The study focused on recruitment rates and retention of participants throughout, and collected data on the interventions’ safety and efficacy.

To illustrate the incidence and epidemiology of fractures due to football. All inpatient and outpatient fractures from a prospectively collected database for a defined population in 2000 were retrospectively analysed. There were 396 football fractures, 96% male. Football caused 39% of the 1022 sports fractures in 2000. This represented 5% of the 8151 fractures in total. The incidence was 61/105. 115/105 in males and 5 /105 in females. The average age was 22.9 years; 22.8 in males and 26.6 in females. 77% of fractures were treated as outpatients. The top five fractures representing 84% of the injuries were Radius+Ulna 30%, Phalanx 19%, Tibial+Fibula 18%, Metacarpal 11% and Clavicle 5%. 71% were upper-limb fractures. The busiest two months were October and May 17% and 14% respectively. The quietest two months were February and December at 5%. Although the epidemiology of football injuries will vary amongst different populations, these results can be generalized to similar population bases. Results will be valuable to medical professionals supporting football teams, enabling them to focus their attention on treating the most common injuries, the majority being treated as outpatients. Football is the most common cause of fractures in sport. As participation increases, the incidence of fractures is likely to reflect this. Upper limb fractures account for over 2/3 rd of fractures with radius+ulna fractures accounting for up to a 1/3rd of fractures; the majority can be treated as an outpatient. Therefore medical teams should be familiar with standard treatment regimes, possible impact on players’ futures and time out of sport

Objectives: The current study evaluates the effectiveness of a direct access physiotherapy shoulder clinic, in terms of a faster treatment, levels of patient satisfaction and consultants workload relief. Material and Methods: A protocol of management of shoulder Pain was created establishing the patients pathway from general practice to orthopaedic surgery. A clinical specialist physiotherapist was trained to lead a shoulder clinic. A course on injections taught by consultants was followed by a training period of 10 supervised injections. After this initial period, a letter was sent to all GPs in the area informing that patients could be referred direct to the physio-shoulder clinic. Patients coded for consultation were also re-directed to that clinic. Only patients who did not improve after the initial treatment or who presented more complicate screening problems were redirected through a short cut to the consultant led clinic. A patient satisfaction questionnaire was used during the first 5 months. Results Over the first 2 years of the project, 203 patients were appointed to the open shoulder clinic. The first 60 patients were given the patient satisfaction questionnaire, with 47 returning it completed. 28 of the 47 had been seen by a physio before. In a satisfaction scale of 1 to 5, 2 graded 3, 3 graded 4 and 42 graded 5 the advice received about their condition. In a similar scale 2 patients rated 3, 2 rated 4 and 43 rated 5 regarding their satisfaction with the opportunity to discuss their treatment/care options. Regarding arrangements for further care, 1 rated 1, 2 rated 3, 6 rated 4 and 36 rated 5. For overall satisfaction 1 rated 2, 2 rated 3, 2 rated 4 and 42 rated 5. Positive aspects of patients feedback included ample time to ask questions, improvement obtained with early start of treatment and more accessible discussion. 47% of the patients attending were followed up by Physiotherapy only, 18% were added directly to the surgical waiting list and 4 were referred for rheumatology. 22% were sent for further tests such as MRI and USS. The waiting list for a first appointment in our upper-limb clinic was reduced from 46 weeks in 2001 to 36 weeks in 2003. Not a single patient insisted on seeing a consultant and 38% of the patients were discharged without specifically seeing one. Conclusion This study shows that a physio screening shoulder clinic is an effective and satisfactory way to reduce waiting times and improve patient care

Objectives: The current study evaluates the effectiveness of a direct access physiotherapy shoulder clinic, in terms of a faster treatment, levels of patient satisfaction and consultant’s workload relief. Material and Methods: A protocol of management of shoulder Pain was created establishing the patient’s pathway from general practice to orthopaedic surgery. A clinical specialist physiotherapist was trained to lead a shoulder clinic, with shoulder treatment courses, shadowing of consultants at 3 shoulder clinics and in-service training on interpretation of x-rays with consultant radiologist. A course on injections taught by consultants was followed by a training period of 10 supervised injections. After this initial period, a letter was sent to all GPs in the catchment area informing that patients could be referred direct to the physio-shoulder clinic. In addition, patients coded for a primary consultation were also re-directed to that clinic. Only patients who did not improve after the initial treatment or who presented more complicate screening problems were redirected through a short cut to the consultant led clinic. A patient satisfaction questionnaire was used during the first 5 months. Results – Over the first 2 years of the project, extending from November 2001 to December 2003, 203 patients were appointed to the open shoulder clinic. The first 60 patients were given the patient satisfaction questionnaire, with 47 returning it completed (78.3%). 28 of the 47 had been seen by a physio before. In a satisfaction scale of 1 to 5, 2 graded 3, 3 graded 4 and 42 graded 5 the advice received about their condition. In a similar scale 2 patients rated 3, 2 rated 4 and 43 rated 5 regarding their satisfaction with the opportunity to discuss their treatment/care options. Regarding arrangements for further care, 1 rated 1, 2 rated 3, 6 rated 4 and 36 rated 5. For overall satisfaction 1 rated 2, 2 rated 3, 2 rated 4 and 42 rated 5. Positive aspects of patient’s feedback included ample time to ask questions, improvement obtained with early start of treatment and more accessible discussion. Those who were not so satisfied were still worried with a long delay, difficulty in peripheral arrangements such as transport and parking and disappointment with long time for follow-up examinations such as MRI scans. 47% of the patients attending were followed up by Physiotherapy only, 18% were added directly to the surgical waiting list and 4 were referred for rheumatology. 22% were sent for further tests (MRI, USS). The waiting list for a first appointment in our upper-limb clinic was reduced from 46 weeks in 2001 to 36 weeks in 2003. Not a single patient insisted on seeing a consultant and 38% of the patients were discharged without specifically seeing one. Conclusion – This study shows that a physio screening shoulder clinic is an effective and satisfactory way to reduce waiting times and improve patient care

Aims

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) has demonstrated faster administration, lower burden of data capture and reduced floor and ceiling effects compared to traditional Patient Reported Outcomes Measurements (PROMs). We investigated the suitability of PROMIS Mobility score in assessing physical function in the sequelae of childhood hip disease.