Dislocation is one of the most common complications in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and is primarily driven by bony or prosthetic impingement. The aim of this study was two-fold. First, to develop a simulation that incorporates the functional position of the femur and pelvis and instantaneously determines range of motion (ROM) limits. Second, to assess the number of patients for whom their functional bony alignment escalates impingement risk.

468 patients underwent a preoperative THA planning protocol that included functional x-rays and a lower limb CT scan. The CT scan was segmented and landmarked, and the x-rays were measured for pelvic tilt, femoral rotation, and preoperative leg length discrepancy (LLD). All patients received 3D templating with the same implant combination (Depuy; Corail/Pinnacle). Implants were positioned according to standardised criteria.

Each patient was simulated in a novel ROM simulation that instantaneously calculates bony and prosthetic impingement limits in functional movements. Simulated motions included flexion and standing-external rotation (ER). Each patient's ROM was simulated with their bones oriented in both functional and neutral positions.

13% patients suffered a ROM impingement for functional but not neutral extension-ER. As a result, 48% patients who failed the functional-ER simulation would not be detected without consideration of the functional bony alignment. 16% patients suffered a ROM impingement for functional but not neutral flexion. As a result, 65% patients who failed the flexion simulation would not be detected without consideration of the functional bony alignment.

We have developed a ROM simulation for use with preoperative planning for THA surgery that can solve bony and prosthetic impingement limits instantaneously. The advantage of our ROM simulation over previous simulations is instantaneous impingement detection, not requiring implant geometries to be analysed prior to use, and addressing the functional position of both the femur and pelvis.

Iliopsoas tendonitis occurs in up to 30% of patients after hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) and is a common reason for revision. The primary purpose of this study was to validate our novel computational model for quantifying iliopsoas impingement in HRA patients using a case-controlled investigation. Secondary purpose was to compare these results with previously measured THA patients.

We conducted a retrospective search in an experienced surgeon's database for HRA patients with iliopsoas tendonitis, confirmed via the active hip flexion test in supine, and control patients without iliopsoas tendonitis, resulting in two cohorts of 12 patients. The CT scans were segmented, landmarked, and used to simulate the iliopsoas impingement in supine and standing pelvic positions. Three discrete impingement values were output for each pelvic position, and the mean and maximum of these values were reported. Cup prominence was measured using a novel, nearest-neighbour algorithm.

The mean cup prominence for the symptomatic cohort was 10.7mm and 5.1mm for the asymptomatic cohort (p << 0.01). The average standing mean impingement for the symptomatic cohort was 0.1mm and 0.0mm for the asymptomatic cohort (p << 0.01). The average standing maximum impingement for the symptomatic cohort was 0.2mm and 0.0mm for the asymptomatic cohort (p << 0.01). Impingement significantly predicted the probability of pain in logistic regression models and the simulation had a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 91%, and an AUC ROC curve of 0.95.

Using a case-controlled investigation, we demonstrated that our novel simulation could detect iliopsoas impingement and differentiate between the symptomatic and asymptomatic cohorts. Interestingly, the HRA patients demonstrated less impingement than the THA patients, despite greater cup prominence. In conclusion, this tool has the potential to be used preoperatively, to guide decisions about optimal cup placement, and postoperatively, to assist in the diagnosis of iliopsoas tendonitis.

Iliopsoas impingement occurs in between 5–30% of patients after hip arthroplasty and has been thought to only be caused by an oversized cup, cup malpositioning, or the depth of the psoas valley. However, no study has associated the relationship between preoperative measurements with the risk of impingement. This study sought to assess impingement between the iliopsoas and acetabular cup using a novel validated model to determine the risk factors for iliopsoas impingement.

413 patients received lower limb CT scans and lateral x-rays that were segmented, landmarked, and measured using a validated preoperative planning protocol. Implants were positioned according to the preference of ten experienced surgeons. The segmented bones were transformed to the standing reference frame and simulated with a novel computational model that detects impingement between the iliopsoas and acetabular cup. Definitions of patients at-risk and not at-risk of impingement were defined from a previous validation study of the simulation. At-risk patients were propensity score matched to not at-risk patients.

21% of patients were assessed as being at-risk of iliopsoas impingement. Significant differences between at-risk patients and not at-risk patients were observed in standing pelvic tilt (p << 0.01), standing femoral internal rotation (p << 0.01), medio-lateral centre-of-rotation (COR) change (p << 0.01), supine cup anteversion (p << 0.01), pre- to postoperative cup offset change (p << 0.001), postoperative gross offset (p = 0.009), and supero-inferior COR change (p = 0.02).

Impingement between the iliopsoas and acetabular cup is under-studied and may be more common than is published in the literature. Previously it has been thought to only be related to cup size or positioning. However, we have observed significant differences between at-risk and not at-risk patients in additional measurements. This indicates that its occurrence is more complex than simply being related to cup position.

In 2021, Vigdorchik et al. published a large multicentre study validating their simple Hip-Spine Classification for determining patient-specific acetabular component positioning in total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of our study was to apply this Hip-Spine Classification to a sample of Australian patients undergoing THA surgery to determine the local acetabular component positioning requirements. Additionally, we propose a modified algorithm for adjusting cup anteversion requirements.

790 patients who underwent THA surgery between January 2021 and June 2022 were assessed for anterior pelvic plane tilt (APPt) and sacral slope (SS) in standing and relaxed seated positions and categorized according to their spinal stiffness and flatback deformity. Spinal stiffness was measured using pelvic mobility (PM); the ΔSS between standing and relaxed seated. Flatback deformity was defined by APPt <-13° in standing. As in Vigdorchik et al., PM of <10° was considered a stiff spine. For our algorithm, PM of <20° indicated the need for increased cup anteversion. Using this approach, patient-specific cup anteversion is increased by 1° for every degree the patient's PM is <20°.

According to the Vigdorchik simple Hip-Spine classification groups, we found: 73% Group 1A, 19% Group 1B, 5% Group 2A, and 3% Group 2B. Therefore, under this classification, 27% of Australian THA patients would have an elevated risk of dislocation due to spinal deformity and/or stiffness. Under our modified definition, 52% patients would require increased cup anteversion to address spinal stiffness.

The Hip-Spine Classification is a simple algorithm that has been shown to indicate to surgeons when adjustments to acetabular cup anteversion are required to account for spinal stiffness or flatback deformity. We investigated this algorithm in an Australian population of patients undergoing THA and propose a modified approach: increasing cup anteversion by 1° for every degree the patient's PM is <20°.

Aims

Iliopsoas impingement occurs in 4% to 30% of patients after undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite a relatively high incidence, there are few attempts at modelling impingement between the iliopsoas and acetabular component, and no attempts at modelling this in a representative cohort of subjects. The purpose of this study was to develop a novel computational model for quantifying the impingement between the iliopsoas and acetabular component and validate its utility in a case-controlled investigation.

Objectives

This study aimed to characterise and qualitatively grade the severity of the corrosion particles released into the hip joint following taper corrosion.

Introduction

The Delta Motion device (developed by Finsbury Orthopaedics, Leatherhead, United Kingdom, now manufactured by DePuy, Leeds, United Kingdom) is a pre-assembled factory fitted cup. It has been introduced to overcome some of the concerns relating to intra-operative assembly with improper seating of the liner and chipping. This device has a thinner shell and liner in comparison with other cups, allowing the use of larger sized heads which should help reduce the risk of impingement and dislocation. A drawback of the pre-assembled design is the inability to use supplementary screws to achieve stability and the difficulty in obtaining primary stability compared with a thin titanium shell. To date we are not aware of any publications reviewing the outcomes of these devices.

Introduction

Modularity is being increasingly used throughout the world for both primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. Recently there have been concerns of increased corrosion and fretting at the modular junctions. In the SROM® modular hip system, two modular junctions are the head-neck taper junction and the stem-sleeve taper junction. The aim of this study was to investigate corrosion at these junctions with the use of different bearing materials.

Introduction

Edge loading commonly occurs in all bearings in hip arthroplasty. Edge loading wear can occur in these bearings when the biomechanical loading axis reaches the edge and the femoral head loads the edge of the cup producing wear damage on both the head and cup edge. When the biomechanical loading axis passes through the polished articulating surface of the acetabular component and does not reach the edge, the center of the head and the center of the cup are concentric. The resulting wear known as concentric wear is low in metal-on-metal (MOM) bearings, and is negligible in ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) bearings. Edge loading is well defined in COC hip bearings. However, edge loading is difficult to identify in MOM bearings, since the metal bearing surfaces do not show wear patterns macroscopically. The aims of this study are to compare edge loading wear rates in COC and MOM bearings, and to relate edge loading to clinical complications.

In patients with conventional metal-on-Polyethylene (MoP) hip replacements, osteolysis can occur in response to wear debris. During revision hip surgery, surgeons usually remove the source of osteolysis (polyethylene) but cannot always remove all of the inflammatory granulomatous tissues in the joint. We used a human/rat xenograft model to evaluate the effects of polyethylene granuloma tissues on bone healing. Human osteoarthritic and periprosthetic tissues collected during primary and revision hip arthroplasty surgeries were transplanted into the distal femora of athymic (nude) rats. The tissues were assessed before and after implantation and the bone response to the tissues was evaluated after 1 week and 3 weeks using micro-computed tomography, histology, and immunohistochemistry. After 3 weeks, the majority (70%) of defects filled with osteoarthritic tissues healed, while only 21% of defects with polyethylene granuloma tissues healed. Polyethylene granuloma tissues in trabecular bone defects inhibited bone healing. Surgeons should remove polyethylene granuloma tissues during revision surgery when possible, since these tissues may slow bone healing around a newly implanted prosthesis. This model provides a method for delivering clinically relevant sized particles into an in vivo model for investigation.

Introduction

Two types of ceramic materials currently used in total hip replacements are third generation hot isostatic pressed (HIPed) alumina ceramic (commercially known as BIOLOX®forte, CeramTec) and fourth generation alumina matrix composite ceramic consisting of 75% alumina, 24% zirconia, and 1% mixed oxides (BIOLOX®delta, CeramTec). Delta ceramic hip components are being used worldwide, but very few studies have analyzed retrieved delta bearings. The aim of this study is to compare edge loading ‘stripe’ wear on retrieved femoral heads from delta-on-delta, delta-on-forte and forte-on-forte ceramic bearings revised within 2 years in vivo.

Ceramic on ceramic articulations had been used since 1970s but with high failure rate.

More recent third generation alumina ceramic had improved results due to better material properties to resist wear and fracture and better methods of fixation with metal back acetabular components. A new clinical problem of squeaking has emerged in the last decade and is now a relatively common occurrence in ceramic on ceramic total hip arthroplasty, with a reported incidence from less than 1% to 20% depending on the definition of the noise. We report experience with over 3000 ceramic-on-ceramic hips including the 10 year minimum follow-up of the first 301 cases.

Methods: Between June 1997 and Feb 1999, 301 consecutive primary cementless hip arthroplasties were performed on 283 patients under the care of the two senior authors. The mean age of the patients was 58.

All patients are asked on follow-up as part of a questionnaire: Has your hip ever made a squeaking noise? To date of the more than 3000 ceramic on ceramic hips that we follow, 74 hips (71 patients) responded yes to this question. Patient demographic and outcome data were analysed in all squeaking hips and compared with all primary ceramic on ceramic hips operated on at our unit.

Results: Of the first 301 cases there have been 9 revision surgeries in 8 hips as follows.

Two acetabular components revised for psoas tendonitis, one of these subsequently had both components revised for acetabular osteolysis with femoral revision to improve anteversion.

There were six other femoral component revisions: four for periprosthetic femoral fractures, one for aseptic loosening and one for transient sciatic nerve palsy. There has been one squeaking hip in this group not requiring revision due to the mild and intermittent nature of the noise. All complications occurred within the first 3 years, no further complication has arisen since.

When comparing the 74 squeaking hips to the entire cohort of primary hips we found that taller, heavier and younger patients are significantly more likely to have hips that squeak.

Squeaking hips have a significantly higher range of post-operative movement than silent hips.

Squeaking hips have a significantly higher Harris hip score. There was no difference in the satisfaction scores between squeaking and silent hips.

Conclusion: In summary, we have reported the large series of third generation alumina ceramic on ceramic articulation with 10 year results, and have demonstrated that it can produce excellent survivorship with good clinical and radiographic outcome. We believe that this result had provided very encouraging evidence to support the use of third generation ceramics as articulation for primary hip arthroplasty, especially in young and active patients.

Squeaking in hip arthroplasty is now well-documented but hitherto poorly understood. In this paper, we report data progressively accumulated from a series of studies undertaken by our group to investigate the mechanisms of noise production associated with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. We reviewed demographic and radiographic data comparing squeaking with silent hips. Edge loading of the acetabular components was investigated on retrieved bearings and with finite element analysis. The squeaking sound itself was further investigated through acoustic analysis. Squeaking occurs in younger, heavier, and taller patients.

We found a higher incidence of acetabular component malposition in squeaking hips and edge loading appears to be a causative factor. Finite element analysis revealed a stiffness mismatch between the shell and liner which may allow the shell to oscillate producing an audible squeak. Acoustic and modal analysis show that squeaking is due to a forced vibration and that the natural frequencies of the ceramic components are above the audible range, suggesting that resonance occurs in the metallic, not the ceramic parts. This phenomenon is related to patient factors, surgical factors, and implant factors, which may produce sound by a combination of edge loading of the ceramic and forced vibration of the acetabular shell and/or the femoral stem.

Squeaking in ceramic on ceramic bearing total hip arthroplasty is well documented but its aetiology is poorly understood. In this study we have undertaken an acoustic analysis of the squeaking sound recorded from 31 ceramic on ceramic bearing hips. The frequencies of these sounds were compared with in vitro acoustic analysis of the component parts of the total hip implant. Analysis of the sounds produced by squeaking hip replacements and comparison of the frequencies of these sounds with the natural frequency of the component parts of the hip replacements indicates that the squeaking sound is due to a friction driven forced vibration resulting in resonance of one or both of the metal components of the implant. Finite element analysis of edge loading of the prostheses shows that there is a stiffness incompatibility between the acetabular shell and the liner.

The shell tends to deform, uncoupling the shell-liner taper system. As a result the liner tends to tilt out of the acetabular shell and slide against the acetabular shell adjacent to the applied load. The amount of sliding varied from 4–40μm. In vitro acoustic and finite element analysis of the component parts of a total hip replacement compared with in vivo acoustic analysis of squeaking hips indicate that either the acetabular shell or the femoral stem can act as an “oscillator’ in a forced vibration system and thus emit a squeak.

Introduction: Squeaking has long been recognized as a complication in hip arthroplasty. It was first reported in the Judet acrylic hemiarthroplasty.¹ It was the squeak of a Judet prosthesis that led John Charnley to investigate friction and lubrication of normal and artificial joints which ultimately led to the concept of low friction arthroplasty. Ceramic on ceramic bearings were pioneered by Boutin in France during the 1970’s, but experienced unacceptably high fracture rates. Charnley demonstrated in vitro squeaking when he tested one of Boutin’s ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in his pendulum friction comparator.² Squeaking has also been reported in other hard on hard bearings, and can also occur after polyethylene bearing surface failure resulting in articulation between metal on metal or ceramic on metal surfaces.^3–6 Recently, squeaking has been increasingly reported in modern ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in hip arthroplasty. However, although well-documented, the aetiology of squeaking in ceramic on ceramic bearings is still poorly understood. The incidence ranges from under 1% to 10%.^7–10 It has been reported in mismatched ceramic couples,11and after ceramic liner fracture.^12,13 An increased risk of squeaking has been demonstrated with acetabular component malposition, as well as in younger, heavier and taller patients.⁹ However, it may also occur in properly matched ceramic bearings with ideal acetabular component position and in the absence of neck to rim impingement.^7–9 In rare cases, the squeak is not tolerated by the patient and has prompted a revision.

Under ideal conditions hard-on-hard bearings are assumed to be operating under conditions of fluid film lubrication with very low friction.^14,15 However, if fluid film lubrication breaks down leading to dry sliding contact there will be a dramatic increase in friction. If this increased friction provides more energy to the system than it can dissipate, instabilities may develop in the form of friction induced vibrations and sound radiation¹⁶. Friction induced vibrations are a special case of forced vibration, where the frequency of the resulting vibration is determined by the natural frequency of the component parts. Running a moistened finger around the rim of a wine glass is an example of this. [Appendix].

The hypothesis of this study is that the squeaking sound that occurs in ceramic on ceramic hip replacement is the result of a forced vibration. This forced vibration can be broken down into a driving force and a resultant dynamic response¹⁷. The driving force is a frictional driving force and occurs when there is a loss of fluid film lubrication resulting in a high friction force^14,15,18. The dynamic response is a vibration of a part of the device (the oscillator) at a frequency that is influenced by the natural frequency of the part¹⁶. By analyzing the frequencies of the sound produced by squeaking hip replacements and comparing them to the natural frequency of the component parts of a hip replacement this study aims to determine which part produces the sound.

Materials and methods: In vitro determination of the natural frequencies of implant components Modal analysis has suggested that resonance of the ceramic components would occur only at frequencies above the human audible range and that resonance of the metal parts would occur at frequencies within the human audible range. Furthermore, that resonance of the combined ceramic insert and titanium shell would not be within the human audible range. To test this hypothesis we performed a simple acoustic analysis. The natural frequency of hip replacement components was determined experimentally using an impulse-excitation method (Grindo-sonic). Components were placed on a soft foam mat in a quiet environment and struck with a wooden mallet. The sound emitted from the component was recorded on a personal computer with an external microphone with a frequency response which ranges from 50Hz to 18,000Hz (Beyerdynamic MCE87, Heilbronn, Ger-many). The computer has an integrated sound card with a frequency response from 20Hz to 24kHz (SoundMAX integrated digital audio chip, Analogue Devices Inc, Norwood, M.A.) and we used a codec with a frequency response from 20Hz to 20kHz (Audio Codec ’97, Intel, Santa Clara, CA). Sound files were captured as 16 bit mono files at a sample rate of 48000Hz using acoustic analysis software (Adobe Audition 1.5, Adobe Systems Incorporated, San Jose, California, USA). We performed fast Fourier transform (FFT) of the sound using FFT size 1024 with a Blackmann-Harris window to detect the frequency components of the emitted sound. (Fast Fourier transform is an accepted and efficient algorithm which enables construction of a frequency spectrum of digitized sound).

We tested the following components: modular ceramic/titanium acetabular components, which included testing the titanium shell and the respective ceramic inserts both assembled according to the manufacturer’s instructions and unassembled; titanium femoral stems and ceramic femoral heads both assembled and unassembled. A range of sizes of each component was tested according to availability from our retrieval collection.

In vivo acoustic analysis: Sound recordings were collected from 31 patients. Nineteen recordings were made at our institution: 16 of these were video and audio recordings and 3 were audio only recordings. Video recording was with a digital video camera recorder (Sony DCR-DVD101E Sony Electronics, San Diego, CA, USA) with the same external microphone used in the in vitro analysis. For 3 patients who could not reproduce the sound in the office we lent them a digital sound recorder for them to take home and record the sound when it occurred (Sony ICD-MX20, Sony Electronics, San Diego, CA, USA). This device has a In vivo acoustic frequency range from 60Hz to 13,500Hz. The remainder of the recordings were video and audio recordings made by surgeons at three other institutions on digital video camera recorders.

Sound files were captured and analyzed by the same method used in the in vitro analysis. Each recording was previewed in the spectral view mode which allows easy visual identification of the squeak in the sound recording. In addition all sound recordings were played, listening for the squeak. Once a squeak was identified a fast Fourier transform (FFT) was performed. We used FFT size 1024 with a Blackmann-Harris window which allowed us to easily pick out the major frequency components. All prominent frequency components were recorded at the beginning of the squeak and at several time points during the squeak if there was any change. A range was recorded for the fundamental frequency component. We were able to determine the frequency range of the recording device used by observing the frequency range of the background noise on the recording. We found that if a squeak was audible on the recording we had no difficulty determining its frequency regardless of the quality of the device used to make the recording or the amount of background noise.

The mean age of the patients was 54 years (23 to 79 years), mean height was 171cm (152 to 186cm) and mean weight was 79kg (52 to 111kg). There were 17 female and 14 male patients. There were nineteen ABGII stem and ABGII cup combinations, 10 accolade stem and trident cup, 1 Exeter stem and trident cup and 1 Osteonics Securfit stem with an Osteonics cup. Ethics committee approval was obtained for this project from our institution and from the referring institutions and informed consent was gained from the patients.

Finite element analysis of edge loading: Edge-loading wear which may provide a mechanism for failure of fluid film lubrication and may therefore play a role in squeaking. To evaluate edge loading further we conducted finite-element analysis (FEA).⁹ Computed tomography (CT) scans of an intact pelvis were obtained from visual human data set (VHD, NLM, Bethesda, Maryland). Slices were taken at 1mm thick with no inter-slice distance through the entire pelvis. The CT files were then read into a contour extraction program and saved into an IGES file format which was imported into PATRAN (MSC Software, Los Angeles, CA) to develop the pelvic geometry. The pelvis was meshed with 10 noded modified tetrahedral elements. The model was reconstructed with a 54mm titanium alloy generic acetabular shell and a 28mm alumina ceramic liner. The acetabular shell and ceramic liner were meshed using 8 noded hexahedral elements. The shell-liner modular taper junction incorporated an 18° angle. The implant contact conditions (Lagrangian multiplier) allowed the liner and shell to slide with a friction coefficient of 0.9. Tied contact conditions were applied between the generic acetabular shell and the bone representing bone ongrowth. Bone material properties were extracted from the CT files by taking the Hounsfield value and the coordinates and mapping to the element in the model allowing us to calculate the Young’s modulus for each element ¹⁹. Material properties for the shell and liner were based on published values²⁰ for titanium alloy and alumina ceramic