Addressing bone defects is a complex medical challenge that involves dealing with various skeletal conditions, including fractures, osteoporosis (OP), bone tumours, and bone infection defects. Despite the availability of multiple conventional treatments for these skeletal conditions, numerous limitations and unresolved issues persist. As a solution, advancements in biomedical materials have recently resulted in novel therapeutic concepts. As an emerging biomaterial for bone defect treatment, graphene oxide (GO) in particular has gained substantial attention from researchers due to its potential applications and prospects. In other words, GO scaffolds have demonstrated remarkable potential for bone defect treatment. Furthermore, GO-loaded biomaterials can promote osteoblast adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation while stimulating bone matrix deposition and formation. Given their favourable biocompatibility and osteoinductive capabilities, these materials offer a novel therapeutic avenue for bone tissue regeneration and repair. This comprehensive review systematically outlines GO scaffolds’ diverse roles and potential applications in bone defect treatment. Cite this article:
Aim. Orthopedic implants play a tremendous role in fixing bone damages due to aging as well as fractures. However, these implants tend to get colonized by bacteria on the surface, leading to infections and subsequently prevention of healing and osteointegration. Recently, Roupie et al. showed that a nisin layer-by-layer based coating applied on biomaterials has both osteogenic and antibacterial properties. The Galleria mellonella larva is a well-known insect infection model that has been used to test the virulence of bacterial and fungal strains as well as for the high throughput screening of
Aim.
Aim. An instrumented blood culture system automatically flags when growth within the culture medium has been detected (‘work in progress’), and subsequently when the organism has been identified. We explore using this data to switch patients to oral therapy within 72 hours post-surgery, reducing costs and improving
Aim. This is the first study to directly compare the clinical outcome of debridement,
Aim. Fast and accurate identification of pathogens causing periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) is essential to initiate effective
Aim. Periprosthetic joint infections follow 1-3% of arthroplasty surgeries, with the biofilm nature of these infections presenting a significant treatment challenge. 1. Prevention strategies include antibiotic-loaded bone cement; however, increases in cementless procedures means there is an urgent need for alternative local
Aim. Suppressive antimicrobial therapy (SAT) is used worldwide for patients with a prosthetic joint infection (PJI but clear definitions or guidelines regarding the indications,
Biomaterial-associated infections (BAI) present a formidable clinical challenge. Bioactive glasses (BG) have proven highly successful in diverse clinical applications, especially in dentistry and orthopaedics. In this study, we aimed to determine the effect of three commonly used BG composition and particle sizes on cell and bacterial attachment and growth. Our focus is on understanding the changes in pH and osmotic pressure in the surrounding environment during glass degradation. First, three different melt-derived glasses were characterized by analyzing particle size and glass network structure using Raman and NMR. The different glasses were then tested in vitro by seeding 4x 104 cells/well (SaOS Cell line) in a 48 well plate. After a pre-incubation period of 72 hours, the different BGs and particle sizes were added to the cells and the pH value, ion release and live/dead staining was measured every hour. The effect of BG against bacteria (Aim
Method
Introduction. In specific conditions, infection may lead to bone loss and is difficult to treat. 1. Current clinical approaches rely on the introduction of antibiotics. While these may be effective, there are concerns regarding the rise of
Aim. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication after total joint arthroplasty. To prevent PJI, strict infection prevention measures are followed in combination with surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP). To date, scientific reports concerning the optimal duration of SAP in revision arthroplasty are scarce. The aim of this multicenter open-label, randomized controlled trial in the Netherlands, is to investigate the superiority of 5 days (extended) versus a single dose of cefazolin to prevent PJI within the first year after revision arthroplasty of the hip and knee. Method. Included patients with an assumed aseptic hip or knee revision procedure received a single dose of 2 or 3 gram cefazolin preoperatively. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive extended prophylaxis of cefazolin during 5 days postoperatively versus no prophylaxis after wound closure. Patients were excluded if evidence of PJI at revision. The primary endpoint was the incidence of PJI within one year after revision arthroplasty. PJI was defined according to the 2018 Philadelphia consensus criteria. With a sample size of 746 patients, an alpha of 5% and a power of 80%, superiority of the extended regimen would be shown if the lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the absolute between-group difference of the percentage of PJI is below −4%. Results. In total 751 patients were included for analysis: 379 in the single dose cefazolin group and 372 in the extended group. Within one year, PJI occurred in 2.6% (10/379) in the single dose group and 2.4% (9/372) in the extended group (risk difference, −0.2 percentage points; 95% CI, −2.5 to 2.0%), thus superiority was not shown. Adverse drug events were seen in 20 cases with extended and 7 cases with a single dose prophylaxis. Conclusions. Extended prophylaxis is not significantly superior to a single dose of cefazolin to prevent PJI within the first year after revision arthroplasty of the hip or knee. This is the first randomized controlled trail in which the duration of SAP in the selected group of patients undergoing revision arthroplasty was studied. Extending SAP after closure of the wound could increase the selection or induction of
Introduction. Various biomaterials and bone graft substitute technologies for use in osteomyelitis treatment are currently used in clinal practice. They vary in mode of action (with or without antibiotics) and clinical application (one-stage or two-stage surgery). This systematic review aims to compare the clinical evidence of different synthetic
Aim. Prosthetic joint infections (PJI) remain a great challenge in orthopedic surgery with a high mortality rate. It is particularly complicated by biofilms and infections caused by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). It concurrently shields bacteria from host immune responses and confers resistance to antibiotics. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of radioimmunotherapy as an innovative therapeutic modality to address the challenges posed by MRSA and its biofilm. Method. We induced specific monoclonal antibodies 4497-IgG1 as carriers, which target wall teichoic acids (WTA) existing on MRSA and its biofilm. Radionuclides actiniumr-225 (. 225. Ac, α-emitter) and lutetium-177 (. 177. Lu, β-emitter) were conjugated with mAbs using DOTA as chelator. Quality control was assessed using thin layer chromatography and immunoreactivity assays. . 225. Ac- and . 177. Lu-labelled 4497-IgG1 were employed to evaluate the susceptibility of MRSA and its biofilm to the radioimmunotherapy in vitro. Planktonic MRSA and biofilms, at concentrations of 10. 8. and 10. 7. CFU/mL, were incubated at 37°C for 60 minutes in PBS containing either . 225. Ac-mAb (0 - 14.8 kBq) or . 177. Lu-mAb (0 - 14.8 MBq). Radiolabelled dunituximab and free radionuclides serve as isotype-matched negative control. The bacterial viability and metabolic activity were subsequently quantified using CFU and XTT assays. Results. The radiochemical purity of the . 225. Ac-mAbs and . 177. Lu-mAbs complex were determined to be 95.4% and 96.16%. Immunoreactivity fractions of them were measured at 81.8% and 80.8%. . 225. Ac-mAbs and . 177. Lu-mAbs exhibited significant and dose-dependent
Aim. Rifampicin and fluoroquinolone based therapy is generally considered as first-choice targeted oral antimicrobial therapy for staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections (PJI) treated with debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR). Alternative equally effective
Aim. Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide with a broad
Introduction. Despite the implementation of numerous preventive measures in recent years, the persistent challenge of periprosthetic infections remains. Among the various strategies, metallic modification of implants, particularly with silver, has emerged as a promising avenue. Silver's
Aims. The mechanism by which synovial fluid (SF) kills bacteria has not yet been elucidated, and a better understanding is needed. We sought to analyze the
The optimum type of antibiotics and their administration route for treating Gram-negative (GN) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) remain controversial. This study aimed to determine the GN bacterial species and antibacterial resistance rates related to clinical GN-PJI, and to determine the efficacy and safety of intra-articular (IA) antibiotic injection after one-stage revision in a GN pathogen-induced PJI rat model of total knee arthroplasty. A total of 36 consecutive PJI patients who had been infected with GN bacteria between February 2015 and December 2021 were retrospectively recruited in order to analyze the GN bacterial species involvement and antibacterial resistance rates. Antibiotic susceptibility assays of the GN bacterial species were performed to screen for the most sensitive antibiotic, which was then used to treat the most common GN pathogen-induced PJI rat model. The rats were randomized either to a PJI control group or to three meropenem groups (intraperitoneal (IP), IA, and IP + IA groups). After two weeks of treatment, infection control level, the side effects, and the volume of antibiotic use were evaluated.Aims
Methods
Our aim was to estimate the total costs of all hospitalizations for treating periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) by main management strategy within 24 months post-diagnosis using activity-based costing. Additionally, we investigated the influence of individual PJI treatment pathways on hospital costs within the first 24 months. Using admission and procedure data from a prospective observational cohort in Australia and New Zealand, Australian Refined Diagnosis Related Groups were assigned to each admitted patient episode of care for activity-based costing estimates of 273 hip PJI patients and 377 knee PJI patients. Costs were aggregated at 24 months post-diagnosis, and are presented in Australian dollars.Aims
Methods
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a challenging complication of any arthroplasty procedure. We reviewed our use of static antibiotic-loaded cement spacers (ABLCSs) for staged management of PJI where segmental bone loss, ligamentous instability, or soft-tissue defects necessitate a static construct. We reviewed factors contributing to their failure and techniques to avoid these complications when using ABLCSs in this context. A retrospective analysis was conducted of 94 patients undergoing first-stage revision of an infected knee prosthesis between September 2007 and January 2020 at a single institution. Radiographs and clinical records were used to assess and classify the incidence and causes of static spacer failure. Of the 94 cases, there were 19 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs), ten revision TKAs (varus-valgus constraint), 20 hinged TKAs, one arthrodesis (nail), one failed spacer (performed elsewhere), 21 distal femoral endoprosthetic arthroplasties, and 22 proximal tibial arthroplasties.Aims
Methods