Background. Current literature of definition, classification and outcomes of fractures of talar body remains controversial. Our primary purpose is to present an unusual combination of fractures of talar body with pantalar involvement / dislocation / extension as a basis for modification of Müller AO / OTA Classification. Methods. We include four consecutive patients, who sustained talar body fractures with pantalar subluxation/dislocation /extension. These unusual injury patterns lead us to reconsider Müller AO / OTA Classification in the light of another widely used talar fracture classification, Hawkins Classification of fractures of neck of talus and subsequent modification by Canale and Kelly. Results. Müller AO / OTA Classification comprises CI – Ankle joint involvement, C2 – Subtalar joint involvement, C3 – Ankle and subtalar joint involvement. We propose Modification of Müller AO / OTA. Classification. C1 – Absolutely undisplaced fracture; C2 – Ankle and Subtalar joint involvement: subluxation; C3 – Ankle and subtalar joint involvement: subluxation with comminution; C4 – Ankle, subtalar and talonavicular joint involvement. Conclusions. Our modification redefines Müller AO / OTA Classification, extends and fills the void in the classification by inclusion of C4, draws attention to stability of talonavicular joint and reflects increasing severity of injury in fractures of talar body

Distal radius fractures (DRF) are the most common fracture type in all age groups combined. Unstable DRF may be surgically managed with volar or dorsal plate fixation. Dorsal plating has traditionally been associated with decreased range of motion (ROM). However, this assumption has not been recently assessed to determine whether functional ROM is achievable (approximately 54o of flexion and 60o of extension) with recent advances in lower profile dorsal plate design. The aim of this study was therefore to compare ROM and patient reported outcome measures between volar and dorsal plating methods for DRF. A meta-analysis was performed to directly compare ROM and DASH scores between dorsal and volar plate fixation for DRF. Separate literature searches for each plating method were performed using MedLine and EMBase on January 28, 2018. Exclusion criteria consisted of non-English articles, basic science articles, animal/cadaver studies, case studies/series, combined operative approaches, papers published more than 20 years ago and paediatric studies. Only articles with at least one year patient follow-up and a) ROM and AO distal radius fracture classification, or b) DASH scores were included. Raw data was extracted from all articles that met inclusion criteria to compile a comprehensive dataset for analysis. Descriptive statistics with z-score comparison for AO classification or a two-tailed independent samples t-test for ROM and DASH scores for dorsal versus volar plating were performed. Significance was defined as p < 0 .05. After rigorous screening, 6 dorsal plating and 43 volar plating articles met inclusion criteria for ROM/AO classification versus 6 dorsal plating and 44 volar plating articles for DASH scores. The weighted means of flexion (dorsal 54.9o, SD 9.3, n=257, volar 61.3o, SD 11.5, n=1906) and extension (dorsal 60.0o, SD 12, n=257, volar 62.8o, SD 11.4, n=1906) were statistically significantly different (both p < 0 .001) between the two plating methods. The volar plating group had a significantly higher proportion of AO type C fractures (dorsal 0.5, n =169, volar 0.6, n=1246, p < 0 .001). The weighted means of reported DASH scores were not significantly different between dorsal (14.01, SD 14.8) versus volar (13.6, SD 12.8) plating (p=0.54). Though mean wrist flexion and extension were statistically different between the dorsal versus volar plating methods, the difference between group means was less than 5o, which is unlikely to be clinically significant. Additionally, we did not find a significant difference in DASH scores between the two plating methods. Taken together, these findings imply that the statistical difference in ROM outcomes are likely not clinically significant and should therefore not dictate choice of plating method for fixation of DRF

Objectives. Distal humerus fractures in elderly population are often comminuted and presents multiple challenges. When managed with fixation the results are often complicated with stiffness, pain, and reduced function while total elbow replacement is fraught with lifelong restrictions on load bearing which can significantly affect elderly patients who rely assistive devices for ambulation. Elbow hemiarthroplasty however, presents a viable alternative in these cases. This series evaluates the results of the distal humerus hemiarthroplasty in a single centre. Designs and methods. Data was collected retrospectively. Comprehensive case reviews were done to collect demographic, intra-operative and post-operative data. Fractures were classified as per AO classification. The primary outcome was functional outcome and range of motion (ROM). The secondary outcomes were complications and patient satisfaction. Results. 22 cases were included in this study from 2016 – 2023 majority being females (n=18). Mean age was 74years (SD −11.2). Majority fractures were AO type C3 (n=15) with two A2 type fractures managed for non-union. Pre-existing bone on bone arthritis was present in 3 cases and CT scan was done for 12 patients to assess fracture configuration. Excluding those treated for non- union the median time between fracture and surgery was 8.5 days. Follow-up of more than 6 months was available for 16 patients with median follow-up of 18 months. ROM was available for 17 patients with 13 (50%) patients having functional ROM. No patients had full extension and there was a mean lag of 20. 0. Mean flexion was 118.2. 0. Nearly 2/3. rd. patients (73%- n=16) were satisfied with the surgery with no problems in activity of daily living. Complications seen were ulnar neuropathy (n=3), heterotopic ossification(n=2) and periprosthetic fracture (n=1). Conclusion. This single centre study suggests good outcomes following distal humerus hemiarthroplasty. It is a reasonable alternative to fixation and total elbow arthroplasty in complex fractures

Introduction. Non-union is debilitating, costly and affects 2–8% of intramedullary fixed fractures. Clinical data suggest that percutaneous interfragmentary screws offer a less invasive alternative to exchange nailing. This study aimed to assess their efficiency with biomechanical analyses. Materials and Methods. A tibia was prepared for finite element analysis by creating a fracture of AO classification 42A2b, prior to reaming and insertion of an intramedullary nail. A callus was modelled as granulation tissue and gait loads were applied. The model was validated against published data and with sensitivity studies. The effects of weightbearing, fracture gap and angle, percutaneous screws and exchange nailing were compared through quantification of interfragmentary motion and strain, with the latter used to gauge healing performance via mechano-regulation theory. Results. Axial interfragmentary motion increased with increasing weightbearing, however, shear decreased at 25–50% weightbearing, leading to superior healing performance. Fracture gap had minimal effect on axial motion, but larger gaps gave greater shear, compromising healing. Elevated fracture obliquity culminated in more shear and inferior healing. Exchange nailing reduced axial motion by ∼30%, but had little effect on shear. Conversely, percutaneous screws had negligible effect on axial motion, but reduced shear by ∼15%, with three screws having a similar net effect on healing as exchange nailing from 10 to 11mm. Conclusions. This study provides new insight into fracture healing biomechanics and discovered that partial weightbearing, less oblique fractures and percutaneous screws all reduce shear, enhancing healing

Introduction. Diaphyseal tibial fractures account for approximately 1.9% of adult fractures. Several studies demonstrate a high proportion of diaphyseal tibial fractures have ipsilateral occult posterior malleolus fractures, this ranges from 22–92.3%. Materials and Methods. A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed at Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust between 1/1/2013 and 9/11/2020. The inclusion criteria were patients over 16, with a diaphyseal tibial fracture and who underwent a CT. The articular fracture extension was categorised into either posterior malleolar (PM) or other fracture. Results. 764 fractures were analysed, 300 had a CT. There were 127 intra-articular fractures. 83 (65.4%) cases were PM and 44 were other fractures. On univariate analysis for PM fractures, fibular spiral (p=.016) fractures, no fibular fracture(p=.003), lateral direction of the tibial fracture (p=.04), female gender (p=.002), AO 42B1 (p=.033) and an increasing angle of tibial fracture. On multivariate regression analysis a high angle of tibia fracture was significant. Other fracture extensions were associated with no fibular fracture (p=.002), medial direction of tibia fracture (p=.004), female gender (p=.000), and AO 42A1 (p=.004), 42A2 (p=.029), 42B3 (p=.035) and 42C2 (p=.032). On multivariate analysis, the lateral direction of tibia fracture, and AO classification 42A1 and 42A2 were significant. Conclusions. Articular extension happened in 42.3%. A number of factors were associated with the extension, however multivariate analysis did not create a suitable prediction model. Nevertheless, rotational tibia fractures with a high angle of fracture should have further investigation with a CT

Introduction. A subset of patients in cast awaiting fixation of ankle fractures require conversion to delayed external fixation (dEF). We aimed to evaluate the effect of delayed versus planned external fixation (pEF), then identify objective characteristics contributing to need for conversion. Method. We extracted data from our booking system to identify all ankle external fixation procedures between 2010 to 2022. Exclusions included open fractures, the skeletally immature, and pilon or talus fractures. Fractures were classified using the AO/OTA classification, then a matched cohort was identified based on fracture classification. We compared the planned, delayed and matched cohorts for demographics, posterior malleolar fragment (PMF) ratio, and degree of displacement at presentation. Results. We identified 25 pEF, 42 dEF, and 67 matched patients. Ankles with dEF had a 3.8 day longer time to ORIF from presentation than those who had pEF, and had an infection rate of 9.5%, compared to 4% in the pEF group. Two patients in the dEF group required further operative intervention. There were no infections or reoperations required in the pEF or matched groups. The dEF group were more likely to have ≥2 reductions (OR 4.13), a PMF ratio of >0.23 (OR 5.07), and have increased displacement at time of injury on lateral (32% vs 19%) and AP (62% vs 36%) radiographs. Discussion. Our retrospective study highlights the longer time to operation and increased infection rates of patients who do not get timely external fixation. We propose a series of objective parameters that predict failure of cast treatment and guide the surgeon to consider planned external fixation in some ankle

Aim. Determine the incidence of surgical site infections (SSI) after intramedullary nailing (IN) of femoral and tibial diaphyseal fractures and evaluate possible risk factors. Method. Prospective observational cohort study. SSI was defined according to CDC-NHSN criteria and surveillance period for the occurrence of infection was 12 months instead of the 90 days currently recommended. Incidence was calculated as the ratio between the number of patients with SSI and total number of patients. Analysis of potential risk factors included patients-related factors (age, gender, body mass index, active foci of infection, immunosuppressive conditions, ASA score, alcohol or illicit drug abuse, smoking, polytrauma, etiology of fracture, type of fracture if closed or open, classification of fracture according to Müller AO, Tcherne classification for closed fractures, Gustilo-Anderson classification and duration of bone exposure for open fractures, previous stay in other healthcare services, use of external fixator, previous surgical manipulation at same topography of fracture, use of blood products); environmental and surgical-related factors (surgical wound classification, duration of surgery, hair removal, intraoperative contamination, antimicrobial use, presence of drains, hypothermia or hypoxia in the perioperative period, type of IN used, reaming, need for muscle or skin flap repair, use of negative pressure therapy) and microbiota-related factors (presence of preoperative colonization by Staphylococcus aureus or Acinetobacter baumannii). Results. 221 patients were included and completed the 12-month follow-up period. Incidence of SSI was 11.8% after 12-month follow-up, but would be 8.59% if used the 90-day vigilance period currently recommended. In the initial analysis by unadjusted logistic regression, following factors were associated SSI: Müller AO classification of the fracture morphology groups 2 or 3, previous use of external fixator, presence of drains, use of negative pressure therapy and need for muscle or skin flap repair. Preoperative colonization by S. aureus or A. baumannii was not associated with occurrence of infection. In the multiple logistic regression-adjusted analysis, only previous use of external fixator and need for muscle or skin flap repair remained associated with SSI. Conclusions. Incidence of SSI associated with IN for femoral and tibial diaphyseal fractures was 11.8%, but currently recommended vigilance period would be less sensitive for SSI detection after fracture fixation. Previous use of external fixators and need for muscle or skin flap repair were factors associated with occurrence of IN related infection

Stable thoracolumbar fracture is a common injury. The factors that determine its outcome are unclear. Aspects of injury severity were analysed for their ability to predict outcome by controlling other outcome-affecting factors (patient's pre-injury health status, legal aspects, associated injuries, etc.). No reliable disc injury severity grading system was available and therefore a new system was developed. A prospective observational study of 44 conservatively treated patients with stable fractures between T11 and L5 was conducted. Bony injury severity was scored based on comminution, apposition and kyphosis parameters. Disc injury severity was scored by the new scale based on variables – Herniation, Indentation, Height decrease and Signal change – seen in MRI. Ten outcome domains (five domains of pain and function each) were assessed at 1 to 2 years from injury. The data was analysed by non-parametric correlation and stepwise-linear regression analysis to assess the predictive value of different variables (patient factors, injury factors and social factor) to outcome. The correlation coefficients between injury severity and outcome were consistently higher with disc injury severity than bony. Disc injury severity showed highest predictive value for both pain (29%) and functional (16%) outcomes, whereas the bony injury severity parameters (kyphosis, etc.) and the posterior ligament injury severity provided no prediction of outcome. According to AO classification, the fractures were A1, A2, A3 and B1; in this spectrum of injuries, the AO classification had no prediction of outcome. The disc injury score also had a good predictive value for final disc degeneration. Disc injury severity should be gauged in advising prognosis and treatment. The new disc injury severity grading system showed good construct validity

Acute Compartment Syndrome (ACS) is an orthopaedic emergency that can develop after a wide array of etiologies. In this pilot study the MY01 device was used to assess its ease of use and its ability to continuously reflect the intracompartmental pressure (ICP) and transmit this data to a mobile device in real time. This preliminary data is from the lead site which is presently expanding data collection to five other sites as part of a multi-center study. Patients with long bone trauma of the lower or upper extremity posing a possibility of developing compartment syndrome were enrolled in the study. Informed consent was obtained from the patients. A Health Canada licensed continuous compartmental pressure monitor (MY01) was used to measure ICP. The device was inserted in the compartment that was deemed most likely to develop ACS and ICP was continuously measured for up to 18 hours. Fractures were classified according to the AO/OTA classification. Patient clinical signs and pain levels were recorded by healthcare staff during routine in-patient monitoring and were compared to the ICP from the device. Important treatment information was pulled from the patient's chart to help correlate all of the patient's data and symptoms. The study period was conducted from November 2020 through December 2021. Twenty-six patients were enrolled. There were 17 males, and nine females. The mean age was 38 years (range, 17–76). Seventeen patients received the device post-operatively and nine received it pre-operatively. Preliminary results show that post-operative ICPs tend to be significantly higher than pre-operative ICPs but tend to trend downwards very quickly. The trend in this measurement appears to be more significant than absolute numbers which is a real change from the previous literature. One patient pre-operatively illustrated a steep trend upwards with minimal clinical symptoms but required compartment release at the time of surgery that exhibited no muscle necrosis. The trend in this patient was very steep and, as predicted, predated the clinical findings of compartment syndrome. This trend allows an early warning signal of the absolute pressure, to come, in the compartment that is being assessed by the device. Preliminary results suggest that this device is reliable and relatively easy to use within our institutions. In addition it suggests that intracompartmental pressures can be higher immediately post-op but lower rapidly when the patient does not develop ACS. These results are in line with current literature of the difference between pre and post-operative baselines and thresholds of ICP, but are much more striking, as continuous measurements have not been part of the data set in most of past studies. Further elucidation of the pressure thresholds and profiles are currently being studied in the ongoing larger multicenter study and will add to our understanding of the critical values. This data, plus the added value of continuous trends in the pressure, upwards or downwards, will aid in preventing muscle necrosis during our management of these difficult long bone fractures

Introduction. Distal femur fracture fixation in elderly presents significant challenges due to osteoporosis and associated comorbidities. There has been an evolution in the management of these fractures with a description of various surgical techniques and fixation methods; however, currently, there is no consensus on the standard of care. Non-union rates of up to 19% and mortality rates of up to 26 % at one year have been reported in the literature. Delay in surgery and delay in mobilisation post-operatively have been identified as two main factors for high rate of mortality. As biomechanical studies have proved better stability with dual plating or nail-plate combination, a trend has been shifting for past few years towards rigid fixation to allow early mobilisation. Our study aims to compare outcomes of distal femur fractures managed with either single plate (SP), dual plating (DP) or nail-plate construct (NP). Methods. A retrospective review of patients aged above 65 years with distal femur fractures (both native and peri-prosthetic) who underwent surgical management between June 2020 and May 2023 was conducted. Patients were divided into three groups based on mode of fixation - single plate or dual plating or nail-plate construct. AO/OTA classification was used for non-periprosthetic, and Unified classification system (UCS) was used for periprosthetic fractures. Data on patient demographics, fracture characteristics, surgical details, postoperative complications, re-operation rate, radiological outcomes and mortality rate were evaluated. Primary objective was to compare re-operation rate and mortality rate between 3 groups at 30 days, 6 months and at 1 year. Results. A cohort of 32 patients with distal femur fractures were included in this study. 91% were females and mean age was 80.97 (range 68–97). 18 (53%) were non-periprosthetic fracture and 14 (47%) were periprosthetic fractures.18 patients underwent single plate fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 8, 33B/C – 2, UCS V3B – 5, V3C – 3),10 patients had dual plate fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 1, 33B/C – 4, UCS V3B – 3, V3C – 2) and 4 patients underwent nail-plate combination fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 4). 70.5% patients had surgery within 36 hours of admission and 90% within 48 hours. Analysis showed no re-operation at 30 days, 6 months in all 3 groups. At 1 year one patient had re-operation in dual-plating periprosthetic group (Distal femur replacement done for failed fixation). Three patients (16%) in single plate group had re-operation at 2 years (2 for peri-implant fracture and 1 for infection). None of the patients treated with Nail-plate combination had re-operation. Mortality rate at 30 days was 0% in among all the 3 groups. At 6 months, it was 16% in single plate group and 0% in DP and NP groups at 6 months and at 1 year mortality rate was 27% in SP group, 10% in DP and 0% in NP group. Combined mortality rate was 0% at 30 days, 9% at 6 months and 18.7% at one year. Conclusion. Our analysis provides insights into fixation methods of distal femur fractures in elderly patients. We conclude that a lower re-operation rate and mortality rate can be achieved with early surgery and rigid fixation with either dual plating or nail-plate construct to allow early mobilisation. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings and guide the selection of optimal surgical strategies for these challenging fractures

The purpose of this study was to review the outcomes and complications of all circular external fixators (frames) used for the management of acute lower limb trauma in our institution over a twenty year period. We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively compiled database of all frames applied in our institution and identified all frames which were applied for acute lower limb trauma. We identified 68 fractures in 63 patients. There were 11 femoral fractures and 57 tibial fractures. All fractures were classified using the AO Classification system, and most fractures were Type C fractures. We used an Ilizarov frame in 53 patients and a Taylor Spatial Frame in 15 patients. The mean time in frame was 365 days for a femoral fracture and 230 days for a tibial fracture. There were five tibial non-unions giving an overall union rate of 93%. Factors associated with non-union included high energy trauma and cigarette smoking. The vast majority of lower limb fractures can be treated using ‘conventional’ methods. Complex fractures which are not amenable to open reduction and internal fixation or cast immobilisation can be treated in a frame with excellent results. The paucity of published reports regarding the use of frames for complex trauma reflects the under-utilisation of the technique

Purpose of study:. The presence of an L5 transverse process fracture is reported in many texts to be a marker of pelvis fracture instability. There is paucity of literature to support this view. Available studies have been performed on patients who were already known to have a pelvis fracture. No study has attempted to document the presence of this lesion in the absence of a pelvis fracture. Primary aim: To identify the correlation between the presence of a L5 transverse process fracture and an unstable pelvic ring injury. Secondary aim: To establish whether a L5 transverse process fracture can occur in the absence of a pelvis fracture. Methods:. We conducted a retrospective review of all CT scans performed in patients who presented to a Level 1 Trauma Unit for blunt abdomino-pelvic trauma between January 1, 2012 and August 28, 2013. A total of 203 patients met our inclusion criteria. Results:. Fifty four of these 203 patients (26%) sustained a pelvis fracture. Of these 54 patients 26 (48%) had an unstable fracture pattern according to the AO classification. Five of these 26 patients (19%) had an associated L5 transverse process fracture. Seven (12%) had an L5 transverse process fracture associated with a stable fracture pattern. Three patients (1.4%) had an isolated L5 transverse process fracture in the absence of a pelvis fracture. Conclusion:. This study confirms the association between the presence of a L5 transverse process fracture and an unstable pelvis fracture pattern. This injury is rarely seen in the absence of a pelvis fracture so its presence should alert the treating clinicians to the existence of a pelvis fracture

Background. Implants based on the polyetheretherketon (PEEK) polymer have been developed in the last decade as an alternative to conventional metallic devices. PEEK devices may provide several advantages over the use of conventional orthopedic materials, including the lack of metal allergies, radiolucency, low artifacts on magnetic resonance imaging scans and the possibility of tailoring mechanical properties. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical results at mean 24-month follow-up using a new plate made of carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketon (CFR-PEEK) for the treatment of distal radius fractures. Materials and methods. We performed a prospective study including all patients who were treated for unstable distal radius fracture with a CFR-PEEK volar fixed angle plate. We included 70 consecutive fractures of AO types B and C that remained displaced after an initial attempt at reduction. The fractures were classified according to the AO classification: 35 fractures were type C1, 13 were type C2, 6 were type C3, 5 were type B1 and 11 were type B2. Results. All fractures healed, and radiographic union was observed at an average of 6 weeks. The final Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 5.2 points. The average grip strength, expressed as a percentage of the contralateral limb, was 94 %. Three cases of hardware breakage were reported. Two cases were due to intraoperative plate rupture caused by the attempt to achieve the reduction of the fracture in 1 case and while inserting a distal screw in the other case. In the last case hardware breakage was caused by a fall on the injuried arm 1 week after surgery. No cases of loss of the surgically achieved fracture reduction were documented. Hardware removal was performed in 3 cases, for the occurrence of extensor tenosynovitis in 2 patients and tenosynovitis of flexor pollicis longus in 1 case. Conclusion. The major advantage of CFR-PEEK plate is its radiolucency. This characteristic allows direct visualization of osseous callus formation, allowing monitoring of the healing of the fracture, thereby improving clinical assessment and accuracy. Therefore, specific indications for this new radiolucent plate can be represented by fractures with significant metaphyseal comminution and in cases of nascent malunion where a distal radius osteotomy with bone grafting is usually performed to correct the wrong angle. At early follow-up this device showed good clinical results and allowed maintenance of reduction in complex, AO fractures. The occurrence of tendon complications related to this implant was similar to that reported in literature for the other new-generation plates. However, attention should be payed when stressing the plate to achieve the desired fracture reduction to avoid hardware failure

Approximately 20% of patients with ankle fracture sustain syndesmosis injury. This is most common in trans-syndesmotic (type B) and supra-syndesmotic (type C) fibula fractures. Intra-operative assessment of syndesmosis integrity is important because failure to treat these injuries can result in ankle instability and pain. Our aim was to audit the documentation of intra-operative testing of syndesmosis during ankle fracture open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). All patients who had ankle fracture ORIF between 1/1/2010 and 21/11/2011 were included. Pre-operative radiographs were reviewed and fractures were classified according to AO classification. Operation notes were reviewed for documentation of assessment of syndesmosis integrity. 153 patients, of mean age 50 years (15–93) were included. 60% (n=92) were female. In 78% of cases (n=119), an assessment of syndesmosis integrity was documented in the operation note. Of the patients with no documented syndesmosis assessment (n=35), the majority had type B fractures (n=34). One patient had a type C fracture. We have shown that 22% of patients undergoing ankle ORIF for fracture do not have documented assessment of syndesmosis integrity. We suggest that all patients who have ankle ORIF should have intra-operative assessment and documentation of syndesmosis integrity so these injuries are identified and treated accordingly

The aim of this study was to establish any association between implant cut-out and a Tip Apex Distance (TAD), ≥25mm, in proximal femoral fractures, following closed reduction and stabilisation, with either a Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) or Intramedullary Hip Screw (IMHS) device. Furthermore, we investigated whether any difference in cut-out rate was related to fracture configuration or implant type. WE conducted a retrospective review of the full clinical records and radiographs of 65 consecutive patients, who underwent either DHS or IMHS fixation of proximal femoral fractures. The TAD was measured in the standard fashion using the combined measured AP and lateral radiograph distances. Fractures were classified according to the Muller AO classification. 35 patients underwent DHS fixation and 30 patients had IMHS fixation. 5 in each group had a TAD≥25mm. There were no cut-outs in the DHS group and 3 in the IMHS group. 2 of the cut-outs had a TAD≥25mm. The 3 cut-outs in the IMHS group had a fracture classification of 31-A2, 31-A3 and 32-A3.1 respectively. In addition, the fractures were inadequately reduced and fixed into a varus position. A TAD<25mm would appear to be associated with a lower rate of cut-out. The cut-out rate in the IMHS group was higher than the DHS group. Contributing factors may have included an unstable fracture configuration and inadequate closed fracture reduction at the time of surgery

Fractures of the proximal femur at the level of the lesser trochanter (reversed and transverse fracture lines, Evans classification type II, AO classification A3 fractures) are known to have an increased risk of fixation failure. 58 patients with such a fracture were randomised to have the fracture fixed with either an intramedullary nail (220 mm Targon PF nail) or a sliding hip screw (SHS). The mean age of the patients was 82 and 11% were male. All patients were followed up for one year by a research nurse blinded to the treatment groups. Mean length of surgery was 50 minutes for the nail versus 52 minutes for the SHS. There were no differences between groups in the need for blood transfusion. Operative complications tended to be less for the nail group (1/27 versus 5/26). Mean hospital stay was 18 days for the nail group versus 29 days for those treated with the SHS. The only fracture healing complications were one case of cut-out in the SHS group and two cut-outs in the nail group, two of which required revision surgery. During follow-up those patients treated with the nail reported a tendency to lower pain scores than those treated with the SHS (p=0.04 at two months). This difference persisted even at one year from injury. Mortality and regain of mobility was similar between groups. These results indicate that for these difficult fractures types both types of fixation produce comparable outcomes

Introduction. Internal fixation of pertrochanteric fractures is evolving as newer implants are being developed. Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) is a recently introduced implant from AO/ASIF designed to compact the cancellous bone and may be particularly useful in unstable and osteoporotic hip fractures. This study is a single and independent centre experience of this implant used in management of acute hip fractures. Methods. 68 patients involving 68 PFNA nailing procedures done over a period of 2 years (2007–09) were included in the study. Average follow-up period of patients was 1 year. AO classification for trochanteric fractures was used to classify all the fractures. Radiological parameters including tip-apex distance and neck shaft angle measurement were assessed. Results. Average age of patients included in the study was 80 years. 18 patients died during the follow up period due to non-procedure related causes. Average tip-apex distance was 12.7 mm and radiological fracture union time was 5 months. Revision of short to a long PFNA was needed for periprosthetic fracture of shaft of femur in two patients. Two patients needed a complex total hip replacement eventually and further two patients had removal of the implant due to PFNA blade penetration through the femoral head. Discussion. PFNA is a technically demanding procedure and has a learning curve. Our experience shows that it is a useful implant in unstable pertrochanteric fracture fixation. A close radiological and clinical follow up is recommended due to the risk of late fracture and implant related complications

Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures seen in the emergency department. Closed reduction can provide definitive management when acceptable radiographic parameters are met. Repeated attempts of closed reduction are often performed to improve the alignment and avoid operative management. However, multiple reduction attempts may worsen dorsal comminution and lead to eventual loss of reduction, resulting in no demonstrable benefit. We hypothesize that compared to one closed reduction attempt, repeated closed reduction of extra-articular, dorsally angulated, displaced distal radius fractures has a low success rate in the prevention of operative fixation and improvement of radiographic parameters. Initial and post reduction radiographs for all distal radius fractures managed at Vancouver General Hospital between 2015 and 2018 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were based on the AO fracture classification and included types 23-A2.1, 23-A2.2 and 23-A3. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18, intra-articular involvement with more than two millimeters of displacement, volar or dorsal Barton fractures, fracture-dislocations, open fractures and volar angulation of the distal segment. Distal radius fractures that met study criteria and underwent two or more attempts of closed reduction were matched by age and gender with fractures that underwent one closed reduction. Radiographic parameters including radial height and inclination, ulnar variance and volar tilt were compared between groups. Sixty-eight distal radius fractures that met study criteria and underwent multiple closed reduction attempts were identified. A repeated closed reduction initially improved the radial height (p = 0.03) and volar tilt (p < 0.001). However, by six to eight weeks the improvement in radial height had been lost (p = 0.001). Comparison of radiographic parameters between the single reduction and multiple reduction groups revealed no difference in any of the radiographic parameters at one week of follow up. By six to eight weeks, the single reduction group had greater radial height (p = 0.01) ulnar variance (p = 0.05) and volar tilt (p = 0.02) compared to the multiple reduction group. With respect to definitive management, 38% of patients who underwent a repeated closed reduction subsequently received surgery, compared to 13% in the single reduction group (p = 0.001). Repeated closed reduction of extra-articular, dorsally angulated, displaced distal radius fractures did not improve alignment compared to a single closed reduction and was associated with increased frequency of surgical fixation. The benefit of repeating a closed reduction should be carefully considered when managing distal radius fractures of this nature

Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures seen in the emergency department. Closed reduction can provide definitive management when acceptable radiographic parameters are met. Repeated attempts of closed reduction are often performed to improve the alignment and avoid operative management. However, multiple reduction attempts may worsen dorsal comminution and lead to eventual loss of reduction, resulting in no demonstrable benefit. We hypothesize that compared to one closed reduction attempt, repeated closed reduction of extra-articular, dorsally angulated, displaced distal radius fractures has a low success rate in the prevention of operative fixation and improvement of radiographic parameters. Initial and post reduction radiographs for all distal radius fractures managed at Vancouver General Hospital between 2015 and 2018 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were based on the AO fracture classification and included types 23-A2.1, 23-A2.2 and 23-A3. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18, intra-articular involvement with more than two millimeters of displacement, volar or dorsal Barton fractures, fracture-dislocations, open fractures and volar angulation of the distal segment. Distal radius fractures that met study criteria and underwent two or more attempts of closed reduction were matched by age and gender with fractures that underwent one closed reduction. Radiographic parameters including radial height and inclination, ulnar variance and volar tilt were compared between groups. Sixty-eight distal radius fractures that met study criteria and underwent multiple closed reduction attempts were identified. A repeated closed reduction initially improved the radial height (p = 0.03) and volar tilt (p < 0.001). However, by six to eight weeks the improvement in radial height had been lost (p = 0.001). Comparison of radiographic parameters between the single reduction and multiple reduction groups revealed no difference in any of the radiographic parameters at one week of follow up. By six to eight weeks, the single reduction group had greater radial height (p = 0.01) ulnar variance (p = 0.05) and volar tilt (p = 0.02) compared to the multiple reduction group. With respect to definitive management, 38% of patients who underwent a repeated closed reduction subsequently received surgery, compared to 13% in the single reduction group (p = 0.001). Repeated closed reduction of extra-articular, dorsally angulated, displaced distal radius fractures did not improve alignment compared to a single closed reduction and was associated with increased frequency of surgical fixation. The benefit of repeating a closed reduction should be carefully considered when managing distal radius fractures of this nature

Introduction. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) is a relatively new surgical technique for the management of distal tibial fractures. Conventional open technique is unfavourable to the fracture biology because of excessive soft tissue stripping and can be associated with significant devastating complications. Objective. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the MIPO technique for distal tibial fractures. Methods. Between 2004 and 2010 twenty-nine consecutive patients had distal tibial fractures treated with MIPO by the senior author. An anteromedial plate (Synthes®) was used for all patients. Case notes and radiographs of all patients were reviewed and data, including demographics, fracture classification, complications and fracture healing were recorded on a database. Results. 29 Patients with a median age of 46 (range 25–82) were reviewed. 12 were female and 17 were male. Mean follow-up was 6.24 months. Using the AO classification there were 16 type A, 1 type B and 12 were type C fractures. Ruedi-Allgower classification showed 6 Group I fractures, 5 Group II fractures and 2 Group III fractures. There were no open fractures. 5 patients had temporary external fixation prior to MIPO. 28 patients had associated fibular fractures of which 6 required open reduction and internal fixation (through a separate surgical incision). There were no postoperative wound complications. No malunion or intraarticular displacement was noted radiographically. Two patients had delayed union but went on to heal without secondary procedures. There was 1 case of non-union. Two patients subsequently had their plates removed due to prominence of the metal work. Conclusion. We conclude that the MIPO technique is safe and effective treatment for the management of distal tibial fractures. Complications associated with MIPO are infrequent and manageable