Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 20 of 27
Results per page:
Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 12, Issue 1 | Pages 5 - 7
1 Feb 2023
Karthikappallil D


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 13, Issue 3 | Pages 8 - 11
3 Jun 2024
Pickering GAE


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 13, Issue 4 | Pages 7 - 9
2 Aug 2024
Monsell F


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 11, Issue 3 | Pages 9 - 11
1 Jun 2022
Foxall-Smith M


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 10, Issue 4 | Pages 5 - 11
1 Aug 2021
Kurien T Scammell BE


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 1, Issue 1 | Pages 2 - 6
1 Feb 2012
Hogervorst T

Osteoarthritis is extremely common and many different causes for it have been described. One such cause is abnormal morphology of the affected joint, the hip being a good example of this. For those joints with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) or developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), a link with subsequent osteoarthritis seems clear. However, far from being abnormal, these variants may be explained by evolution, certainly so for FAI, and may actually be normal rather than representing deformity or disease. The animal equivalent of FAI is coxa recta, commonly found in species that run and jump. It is rarely found in animals that climb and swim. In contrast are the animals with coxa rotunda, a perfectly spherical femoral head, and more in keeping with the coxa profunda of mankind. This article describes the evolutionary process of the human hip and its link to FAI and DDH. Do we need to worry after all?


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 10, Issue 2 | Pages 5 - 16
1 Apr 2021
Coco V Shivji F Thompson P Grassi A Zaffagnini S Spalding T


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 1, Issue 3 | Pages 2 - 4
1 Jun 2012
Cobb JP Andrews BL

In a global environment of rising costs and limited funds, robotic and computer-assisted orthopaedic technologies could provide the means to drive a necessary revolution in arthroplasty productivity. Robots have been used to operate on humans for 20 years, but the adoption of the technology has lagged behind that of the manufacturing industry. The use of robots in surgery should enable cost savings by reducing instrumentation and inventories, and improving accuracy. Despite these benefits, the orthopaedic community has been resistant to change. If the ergonomics and economics are right, robotic technology just might transform the provision of joint replacement


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 5 | Pages 4 - 10
1 Oct 2019
Tsoi K Samuel A Jeys LM Ashford RU Gregory JJ


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 4 | Pages 5 - 13
1 Aug 2019
Middleton R Khan T Alvand A


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 8, Issue 1 | Pages 3 - 7
1 Feb 2019
Eames N Golash A Birch N


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 7, Issue 6 | Pages 2 - 8
1 Dec 2018
Murray IR Safran MR LaPrade RF


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 1 | Pages 3 - 6
1 Feb 2017
Horn A Eastwood D


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 6, Issue 4 | Pages 2 - 7
1 Aug 2017
Titchener AG Tambe AA Clark DI


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 2, Issue 6 | Pages 2 - 8
1 Dec 2013
Jones R Wood D

This article provides an overview of the role of genomics in sarcomas and describes how new methods of analysis and comparative screening have provided the potential to progress understanding and treatment of sarcoma. This article reviews genomic techniques, the evolution of the use of genomics in cancer, the current state of genomic analysis, and also provides an overview of the medical, social and economic implications of recent genomic advances.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 4, Issue 5 | Pages 2 - 7
1 Oct 2015
Clark GW Wood DJ

The use of robotics in arthroplasty surgery is expanding rapidly as improvements in the technology evolve. This article examines current evidence to justify the usage of robotics, as well as the future potential in this emerging field.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 1, Issue 6 | Pages 2 - 7
1 Dec 2012
IJpma FFA ten Duis HJ van Gulik TM

A comprehensive study of osteology remains a cornerstone of current orthopaedic and traumatological education. Osteology was already established as an important part of surgical education by the 16th century. In order to teach anatomy and osteology, the corpses of executed criminals were dissected by the praelector anatomiae of the Amsterdam Guild of Surgeons. Magnificent anatomical atlases preserve the knowledge obtained from these dissections. We present an overview of the most authoritative works of Vesalius, Bidloo, Cheselden, and Albinus authored in the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries. At that time a knowledge of osteology was necessary to pass the ‘master-exam’ in order to become a surgeon, and anatomical teaching was traditionally based on the practice of dissection. In the modern era, anatomical dissection and illustrations are largely being replaced by three-dimensional imaging and computer simulations, with an unfortunate trend in current curricula away from the established teaching technique of dissection. Education through the practice of dissection, particularly for future surgeons, remains integral to the development of tissue handling techniques, understanding of anatomical variation, and furthering of spatial awareness skills. With this review, we seek to remind contemporary surgeons of the lessons we can learn from our predecessors who valued education through anatomical dissection.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 4, Issue 4 | Pages 2 - 7
1 Aug 2015
Nicol S Jackson M Monsell F

This review explores recent advances in fixator design and used in contemporary orthopaedic practice including the management of bone loss, complex deformity and severe isolated limb injury.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 4, Issue 3 | Pages 2 - 6
1 Jun 2015
Sahota O

Clinical studies evaluating the effects of vitamin D alone or in combination with calcium on physical function, falls and fractures have been inconsistent. Vitamin D has, however, been the focus of much orthopaedic, trauma and endocrine research. Playing a central role in muscle and bone metabolism, some studies on Vitamin D therapies offer the tantalising suggestion of a reduction in falls and fractures simply with vitamin D supplementation. We review the background and evidence behind vitamin D.


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 2, Issue 3 | Pages 2 - 5
1 Jun 2013
McNamara K

According to a report by Millennium Research Group in January 2011, the US orthopaedic extremity device market will generate over $4.6 billion in revenue by 2015.1 With an ageing demographic and increasing demand for better quality of life into old age, there is clearly a commercial drive for the orthopaedic device community to develop new and innovative solutions to bone and joint problems. Devising such solutions is one thing; protecting them, so that research investment can be rewarded, is another. How is such protection achieved? The judicious use of intellectual property rights plays a key role, and this article aims to provide some information about the use of patents to protect innovation.